Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    I am starting an image hosting service. Suggestions?

    Hey folks!

    I'm working on a free image hosting service for communities like It should be live in a week or two. It'll probably be in beta for about a month after that, while more advanced features are added.

    The idea behind the service is something quick, clean, and simple. Ease of navigation will be a must. I am thinking of the following list of features:

    - 1-click anonymous uploads
    - Easy-to-browse user galleries for registered users.
    - Registered users get 100MB of space
    - Group galleries (one user starts a group gallery and adds other users to it)
    - 1MB maximum file size, no bandwidth limits (tentative)
    - Automatically generated thumbnails and HTML / BB code
    - Image ratings / comments (can be disabled when uploading)
    - Optional large preview thumbnails (tentative: 225 x 255 px or so)
    - No pop-up ads or crap like that, of course
    - Uploaded images are not scaled, watermarked or modified in any way
    - Using full-size images remotely (eg. hotlinking the full image directly into a forum post) will probably not be allowed.

    The hotlinking issue is one thing I am not absolutely sure on. IMHO, I don't see why someone would want a 1000x1000 image in a forum thread anyways, when they can post convenient thumbnails that link to the full image. Also, if hotlinking is allowed then more stringent bandwidth limits would have to be instated, and that would suck.

    Anyhow, I will be extremely grateful for any input or suggestions anyone may have.



  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Berlin, Germany
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    On art forums, hotlinking is a MUST. It's all about the images. Clicking on a thumbnail or link is too much of a hassle for a lot of people. I see no reason to use your service, when there are others like imageshack ect, who allow hotlinking. There's Flickr, which is huge, with usergroups and user galleries..
    Conceptart has it's own image upload, too.. so people here won't be too enthuasiastic about yet another image hosting service.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thanks very much for the reply, nacho.

    Already I have much to meditate on.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Pasadena, CA
    Thanked 308 Times in 195 Posts
    nacho is right.. I don't care if it's Justin Sweet posting exclusive sketches that only we can see, if it's all in thumbnails (a fairly hefty body of work that is), I wouldn't waste my time clicking through all of them.
    Also, rating systems are usually a waste of time IMHO, on this forum while stars on threads -usually- indicate quality, it is quite often a form of competition, it depresses some people even. Craig Mullins' site has a rating system. All of his pieces are rated 2.8 out of 5. Everyone knows that more than half the people looking there like the work and click '5', but some jealous bastards feel the need to set a really low bar I guess.

    But yeah, hotlinking=must

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: June 10th, 2008, 01:15 PM
  2. In Need of New Hosting Service
    By Dominie_Dirtch in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 17th, 2004, 06:56 AM
  3. Art: image hosting
    By Trigger00 in forum Finished Art
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 23rd, 2003, 08:27 PM
  4. Free image hosting service
    By UnionSung in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 5th, 2002, 04:04 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast