Page 22 of 27 FirstFirst ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LastLast
Results 274 to 286 of 349

Thread: Last Man Standing 2 • Round Two • Matches 1-30 (HUGE D/L)

  1. #274
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,173
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 98 Times in 35 Posts
    I'm going to put my neck on the block here and say that I am flabbergasted that Magicgoo's entry didn't go on or even rate with the judges. Whilst I object to Magicgoo's public complaint (after all, thunderdome is just a big game, life goes on and hopefully you got useful practice out of it), it cannot have gone unnoticed that images like robot's entry are routinely rejected from the weekly activity forums as unfinished. IMHO robot keeps better work in his sketchbook.

    From the round one thread: "Keep in mind that the goal of the competition is to create a full-fledged illustration every round, so you'll be judged on your technique, concept, designs, and narrative."

    This is what I construe as a call for completeness. Correct me if I'm wrong. If indeed this criterion was kept in mind by the judges it certainly isn't expressed in the result of match 30.

    Thankyou for hearing me out. Now, deride away if you think it's justified.

    PS thankyou for your crits sve, justin and anyone else i may have missed out. I think i learned a lot from this pic.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #275
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    254
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
    Take a look at Bob Peak's movie poster work, and you'll realize that the unfinished look doesn't necessarily mean the piece is unfinished. On a competitive level, go through a Spectrum annual and you'll see a simple line drawing of a single figure by Frank Cho getting a full page while a highly detailed massive battle between two large armies gets the lower right hand corner on a different page. Sure, it's subjective which piece should have gotten the full page (or have even gotten in at all), but you have to realize that with enough trained professionals looking through these, there's at least some method to the madness, and that there can be a distinct, almost palpable charm in something as simple as a gestural line to describe a leg, over a highly detailed (possibly overworked) but unnecessary fourtieth soldier. So going back to match 30, rendering all those tentacles does not entitle someone to win, or get at least one vote, over something that simply looks like it took less effort. And I'm not trying to kick you while you're down Ursula. Just to bring my example around full circle, I did not get into Spectrum at all this year, and I know I'll be pissed when I see it come out this November.... so believe me, I can relate to your frustration.... but I still respect the pros involved, and I'm inspired to work that much harder without putting a bitter taste in the mouths of those who did advance or succeed. And that's what this should be about in the first place; being inspired to work harder and grow.

    p.s. Thanks Justin O.
    Last edited by Mike Dutton; October 2nd, 2006 at 03:11 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #276
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Sacramento and Los Angeles
    Posts
    988
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 164 Times in 61 Posts
    One thing you guys need to keep in mind is that just because a piece got 5 out of 5 votes, and another didnt get any, doesnt mean that the judges were trying to tell you that your piece was a lot worse or a lot better than the other one. The judges arent working together. They might have all thought it was really close and only coincidentally all chose the same piece. Its 5 different judges. Not one judge handing out 5 points.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #277
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,188
    Thanks
    785
    Thanked 666 Times in 165 Posts
    Now that I've slept over it, and thought a bit, I don't think that point rating would be cool, because it would deresponsabilise the judges ("let's put 10 to all those great entries")... with the current system, they have to make a hard choice, and this is better I think, and as cody said, there will be more judges now, so more sensibilities and different points of view...

    I think the only change that should be made is what Aleksi suggested, hiding the names.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #278
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Near Brussels
    Posts
    1,289
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 154 Times in 100 Posts
    I think the only change that should be made is what Aleksi suggested, hiding the names.
    I fully agree on that.


    Magicgoo, have you looked and tried to understand your opponents piece?
    Yes indeed, it's colorless, but it enhances the piece I think.
    A guy dressed up till his hair in black and white, comes out of the colorless
    city and walks towards colorfull nature and in the mean time getting
    rid of his colorless clothes, freeing his mind.

    I think his piece is well thought out and reflects 'the escape' well.
    www.tomvandewouwer.com

    "There is no such thing as 'accurate drawing'. There is beautiful
    drawing, and ugly, and nothing else." JAD Ingres, Ecrits sur l'art
    (1780-1865)"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #279
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    3,535
    Thanks
    236
    Thanked 307 Times in 195 Posts
    To me match 30 seemed like a tough call if I was judging; a full illustration, good composition, but a few anatomy errors, vs. 7 drawn out figures (even if he had to copy/paste the heads) with very good anatomy, muscalture etc., but with some pretty stale colors, I would choose the latter. More because I would rather look at some awesome figure drawings in black and white over 1 full colored illustration-

    And Ursula, it isn't like the judges knew how much time went into each piece. I was pretty pissed that I lost first round (but not suprised), but now I am really pissed that the winner of that match didn't even SUBMIT this round.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #280
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,994
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 241 Times in 65 Posts
    You're all entirely entitled to disagree.

    When the bashing starts, however, hmmm....

    So far I've been sarcastically called "classy." So let me just interpret that as you calling me trashy, Cody. And in the same post, I've received this:

    Boo hoo hoo, you didn't win a goddamn online art contest that was run purely for fun. And what a travesty that the pieces you thought should win didn't! By god, I better contact you soon so that you can judge all of the upcoming matches all by your lonesome... Criticism is fine and encouraged. You attempting to tear down artists and judges alike because they didn't match your highness' expectations is just plain fucking sad.
    For stating my opinion, I've been indirectly told not to enter any more of these contests. How about if you can't react well to disagreements, then don't post on the internet? Because, instead of 271 contenders, you've got 6 billion. I am not "plain fucking sad," Cody. But, thanks for your opinion anyway.

    Sve, if art is not countable, then is 1 of 2 pieces entirely discountable? As in, does it deserve no recognition of its existence at all? I believe the rating system would be more helpful simply because it acts as a critique in itself. It places a number on how much or how little you need to improve your art. It is not designed to give a point to the people whose "feelings are hurt" as Coro said. I also didn't say for the general public to judge, Coro. The ratings would be for the pro judges' use.

    Also, this system would not for just work the LMS. Look at it this way: Let's say there's a Tdome of 50 people. And the prize for the top 3 winners is a paintbrush or a hug or a BJ or a signed sketch or something. Whatever: Just imagine that the starter of the Tdome is actually giving away 3 prizes. Well, with the poll voting, you can only give your vote to one person, so in theory, one person could receive 100 votes and 49 others would receive zero. Or, if there are 10 judges, they might all give their 1 vote to 1 person. How is that an accurate contest, especially if there needed to be a top 3?

    Trιs Cutι Sketch Group
    magicgoo bluemech cwn annwn light dished
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #281
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    413
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
    I'm truly grateful for this event and the effort everyone involved put in it.

    what I wish for is to see closing comments within each group of competitors regarding why a piece got chosen instead of the other ones. this would clarify how the judges think and probably bring some satisfaction to the dissatisfied, but most of all we would learn from it

    that along with aleksi's idea would be great.
    Last edited by DARYL; October 2nd, 2006 at 02:59 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #282
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sesh Planet
    Posts
    2,586
    Thanks
    295
    Thanked 517 Times in 128 Posts
    Hi,

    Firstly, I'd just like to say a big congrats to everyone for doing such amazing work. And nice one to JTJ - keep going, son.

    With regard to Teh Controversy, I have to say that there is always a bit of disappointment, and I never feel that every single deserved winner is judged as such. Coro, I salute you. True sportsmanship.

    Those of us from countries where the Beautiful Game is celebrated will know that this is part of life, however. There's No Way In Hell Jens Lehmann should have been sent off in the Champions League final last year, it should have been a yellow card and an allowed goal. And without that, Arsenal may well have lifted the trophy. But the point is that our sports aren't engineered like American sports, where the better team is pretty well guaranteed to win. In our way of doing things, there's a hell of a lot of room for controversy. And it makes the passion of the game about 1000 times greater!

    In other words, I'm sorry to say this (and I'm sorry I lost). But this is essentially a game. There are tactics and there is injustice. And it makes you want to kick everyone's ass even more next time.

    So congrats to the winners and good luck to the departed.

    Rock on
    DC

    **edit PS: I actually think the points outta ten or percentage idea or whatever is a great one. It would maybe force it to be a bit less about dynamism and impact and a bit more balanced. Not griping about anything, just think the Goo is onto something.**
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. #283
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    11,548
    Thanks
    2,089
    Thanked 11,357 Times in 2,878 Posts
    so much drama....keep it constructive k?

    previous tdomes were judged on a points scale for different categories.

    idea development
    technical craftsmanship
    design
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  12. #284
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,250
    Thanks
    239
    Thanked 319 Times in 109 Posts
    The judges are free to give comments and crits on each piece, but requiring them to do that would not be a good idea at all. They're volunteering their time, and they're busy people. Remember how long it took to get the results for Round 1? That only involved them picking a winner for each round. Making them comment on each and every piece would make it take months before we got any results.

    It sucks to spend all this time on a piece and not get any sort of feedback, but we can't rely on the judges to provide that. The Thunderdome is not a good place to get indepth crits, but luckily we have people like sve.



    0kelvin
    www.WhereIsMyEyeball.com My portfolio! Go check it out!
    Sketchbook
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #285
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,913
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked 200 Times in 123 Posts
    Ursula, I understand your concern very much, but it will not change much in my opinion. Because I'm pretty sure that idea to compare art work is absurd. For me, it is.
    But ... if we want to do some contest just for fun and enjoyment and sportsmanship we accept some rules, just for the sake of order and with purpose to move on, not to stand forever on one spot with 271 contestants.

    The rules are not perfect and they don't do justice to the art in my mind, because this justice is subjective for everyone. It is just a system to pick up some artwork from offered with some principle as a base. In our case, just eyes and taste of by everyone respected people who have a lot of experience in this field.

    It is like in figure skating, when they rate the performance according to how they skate technically, literraly if they did all the jumps and acrobatic numbers and did them correctly, well it is understandable, you can measure and compare that. But marks for the artistism, beauty of dance, well, it is laughable for me, because it is just matter of taste. And shortly put it is bogus rating, in my opinion.
    I do appreciate you speaking your mind, because it is interesting to hear other person opinion. Hope you are doing great.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. #286
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    3,714
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 849 Times in 162 Posts
    Edited. Might as well leave this spicy stuff off the forums.

    Each judge judges based on the factors that Manley just listed. You all want a point system to subjectively quantify each dimension of a piece of artwork, fine. It was planned for future rounds with larger pairings anyway. But consider this... you try rallying a large panel of professionals who have busy enough schedules as it is and tell them to judge 271 pieces of artwork, each requiring more in-depth judging for multiple categories and to type out all of their results before sending them back. Not going to happen for such a large tournament. Now that it is smaller, yes, we will implement something a little more intricate. Just take into account the scale of this thunderdome, it's huge. Of course a more involved judging system would be nice, but not everyone has hours and hours to spend judging this thing. Think about it.
    Last edited by strych9ine; October 2nd, 2006 at 09:05 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 22 of 27 FirstFirst ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Art: Last Man Standing 2 • Round One • Matches 61-90 (HUGE D/L)
    By strych9ine in forum FINISHED ART & ARTWORK
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: August 9th, 2006, 07:42 AM
  2. Last Man Standing 2 • Round One • Matches 1-30 (HUGE D/L)
    By strych9ine in forum Last Man Standing Archive
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: August 7th, 2006, 10:22 PM
  3. Art: Last Man Standing 2 • Round One • Matches 31-60 (HUGE D/L)
    By strych9ine in forum FINISHED ART & ARTWORK
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: August 7th, 2006, 02:44 PM

Members who have read this thread: 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook