Results 1 to 13 of 106
Thread: realism vs modernism
March 21st, 2006 #1
realism vs modernism
Alrighty! it seems to me that there are alot of modernist sympathizers here at Ca so I figure there could be fuel for a good debate , Now I'm a huge realist fan and quite honestly I don't think that modernists who prance around making half assed paintings and claiming that they're more enlightened than realists deserve the status that they enjoy. Now I started this thread because of a debate in another sketch thread (I didn't want to ruin that great thread) and I strongly believe that modernists are traversties, frauds and charlatans. Oh yeh and I have proof!
all I'm asking for is a show of hands of who agrees..8)
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 21st, 2006 #2
No position or belief, whether religious, political or social, is valid if one has to lie to support it.--Alj Mary
Ironically, the concept of SIMPLICITY is most often misunderstood by simple-minded people. --Alj Mary
March 21st, 2006 #3
..what? where the hell have you been for the last 90 years?
March 21st, 2006 #4
For two thirds of them he's been right here.
Ilaekae knows the answer... the question is, do you?
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
March 21st, 2006 #5
study and understand art history (which means starting with the cave paintings from Lascaux all the way up to contemporary art) and ye shall find the answer.
It doesn't mean that you personally have to "like" every single piece of art, but it should help you gain some insight on the matter.
March 21st, 2006 #6
Eh... I'm not so much to modernistic paintings either (although Edvard Munch's Scream sure is interesting and memorable)...
But the modernist graphic designs however are tops (gave birth to Late Modern movement artists Saul Bass and Paul Rand)!... Dadaism is cool too...
LONG LIVE YOKO KANNO!!!
March 21st, 2006 #7
When did modernism become a) an institution and b) the antithesis of realism? As Elwell said, do you know what you're talking about? Because I sure as hell don't understand. All I've seen is you tearing apart senbdoij because his art- not specifically designed with your arrogant criterion of being a still life with grapes in mind - didn't quite get you off, in one of the most surreal threads I've seen here. There's modernism for you.
Frankly you need to stop being such a bucket of bitch and realise that art is art is art. Why aren't you drawing so that you have a leg to stand on when you dig into someone's work? You can only live vicariously through your favourite genre for so long.
March 21st, 2006 #8
you should be doing photography... thats pure realism...
edit: or is it...
anyhow... i think all conflict start from misunderstanding...
so lets settle this... when you say modernism you mean abstraction?
or was it "half assed painting", what do you mean by that?
if someone puts "works" on an abstraction, what the heck happens?
in art history realism is part of your modernism by the way
art is more and more about the research you know, not the rendered piece
if all your asking for is hands that support u...
havent i already told you that i agree about not giving up on the devellopement
to me, thats a realistic statement...
Last edited by senbdoij; March 21st, 2006 at 04:00 AM.
March 21st, 2006 #9
I never understand why, when I put a point of view forward it creates so much damn anamosity. Is everyone at Ca naturally aggressive?
Originally Posted by Snarfevs
March 21st, 2006 #10
March 21st, 2006 #11
Realism is approaching the subject with a straight forward manner without idealizetion...
and modernism is about furniture and art deco...
and over what has this lost its popularity?
probably a mixture of both...
you wouldnt believe what aberation people do these days...
appropriations and instalation are very out of date
just to let you imagine
Last edited by senbdoij; March 21st, 2006 at 04:07 AM.
March 21st, 2006 #12
where would you classify someone like:
March 21st, 2006 #13
Ned - I do not understand YOU.
I understand modernism well.
I also understand that people know what they like - you cannot trick people into giving modernism critical acclaim, people aren't waking up to deception. Social climates and public tastes change. Modernism isn't being rolled back, it's being superseded. Trailblazers can be accepted or rejected at will by the most bland or recherche elements of society. Modernism is not some aggressive meme that takes over the brains of otherwise rational people and causes them to buy bad art.
You can't assume that your postulated alternate history that brought about modernism (that being charlatans formulating a plot to get people to buy 'bad' art) can be reversed by you telling people that they are wrong because that history doesn't exist. Modernism arose because people realised that they could perhaps start articulating more than verbatim copies of objective reality in their work. Art survives through arousing interest. Not because it is necessarily pretty, not because it is necessarily competent and not because you or anyone else says so.
Now please kindly write off your war on reality and draw. Honestly what do you have to complain about? Did a modernist force you into buying art you didn't want?
Last edited by Snarfevs; March 21st, 2006 at 04:47 AM.