when i look at critique by some ppl like for example .
some give advice to adjust the faces or bodys to the standard form of lets say a model. with no flaws or disformed features.
in art if lets say your not drawing a supermodel guy or chick. how can the advice be that the head is to small or arms to long?
its so hard to give advice for how a human should look.also in creatures and demons. there is advice on anatomy and such.
i agree that a non functional limb that will make it difficult or even stop the creature from moving is not encouraged.
lights and shadows is much more easy to recieve and give advice for. but sometimes its very hard to give critique for something.
lets say you draw a tyrannusaurus perfectly, and then coloring it bright pink and purple. now we have all seen that the tyrannusaurus is greenish in color but non of us really know.
so should we continue to give critique for anatomy and colors when the original is flawed and not perfect?
not many humans look like male models or chick models.
if the concept looks better with a good looking guy with tons of muscle then a guy with a beer belly and zits on his face or whatever.then the advice should be applied yea, but not in other ways.
the struggle for the perfect human race ,well atleast anatomly correct is sometimes overrated in forms of critique if you ask me.
its more fun and cool with flaws and wierd stuff that makes the character personal.
what do you think?