Results 1 to 16 of 16
Thread: Hours of Drawing
September 28th, 2005 #1
Hours of Drawing
I try to draw with emotion. Most of these pictures are studies of emotion and not so much how well they are rendered and the like.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberSeptember 28th, 2005 #2
September 28th, 2005 #3
Hey, Kane702. I like these drawings very much. I think the emotion is here in your work. And it's even greater because the emotion in first drawing is not so obvious, subtle. That's very hard to catch. So thank you for sharing
Last edited by sve; September 28th, 2005 at 01:45 PM.
September 28th, 2005 #4
September 28th, 2005 #5
September 28th, 2005 #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- right here
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think it's not bad, but the emotion doesn't really show through in the last picture. It's a more comic book style look, but not to realistic. You should work a bit on the muscels covering the cheek bones and try to move them too, as you did with the nose. I like the anatomy sketch below. Looks a bit like young Burt Lancaster. His rght knee is to extended, but the rest isn't bad.
Keep on drawing.
"Happen to every guy sometimes this does."
September 28th, 2005 #7
I think is nice that somebody really takes care on how the muscles moves with the expressions of the face, muscles and bones, but always the question when you draw is about how it is or how it looks, normally in drawing the answer is close to how it looks, but for sure to do it that way you need to know how it is... is like a riddle
Keep it going
September 28th, 2005 #8Originally Posted by Sawa
September 29th, 2005 #9
Some Analytical studies.
What do you think makes picture one different from picture two? Besides the obvious.
September 29th, 2005 #10
September 29th, 2005 #11
October 3rd, 2005 #12Originally Posted by Sawa
I am using Cyclopedia Anatomicae by Gyorgy Feher and Anatomy for the Artist by Jeno Barcsary. The Anatomy for the Artist is an old Hungarian 1st edition and I don't know if many people have heard of it (by this author at least).
October 5th, 2005 #13
I tried to do a comparison of laughing and crying. The crying picture I used a referance on but the laughing I didn't.
The Internet is my inspiration.
October 6th, 2005 #14
October 6th, 2005 #15
I saw a different way of coloring an image the other day. This was my first attempt but I am in no way "good" at PS so I get king of lost. Don't mind the invisable foot and leg.
If anyone can give any advice on the next steps I could take it would be greatly appreciated!
The Internet is my inspiration.
October 7th, 2005 #16
Hey Kayne, nice start! Really good idea for the crying vs. laughing. I suggest you scan your drawing in grayscale mode (or at least convert it to grayscale in PS), you would'nt get the red-blue-green pixels within your lines.
For the color piece my first tought would go for contrast and highlights on the red clothes, it's too gray (highlights should always reach white or almost) and it look a bit pasted on the character, maybe adding some shadows on the body, shadows that would be casted by the clothes (You can tint those redish like if the light was crossing the clothes). I see you use the COLOR mode for layer transparency, it's a quick solution but unapropriate for some areas as for the rock/boulder highlights. Keep up the good work man!