Mike & Chester

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Mike & Chester

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Mike & Chester

    Mike & Chester

    Mike & Chester

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    On the fringes of "acceptable" observation and commentary.
    Posts
    2,347
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 136 Times in 60 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like these, but I don't, yet I do...
    I think I'm not alone, which is why the reply count for this is so low...
    The first one is better, subject wise, from a technical standpoint. His hand is very well rendered. What hurts this is the angle of his head, and his hairstyle. Both give him a leaning, crooked rendering effect.

    The fact that you've cut off his right hand and both feet also hurts this piece a lot. Always try to make portraits that are more than heads, complete body works. You can always take it off. It's hard to add it on...

    The second one has a nice and dynamic pose, but the technical execution hurts you. The shading is very crude and hurriedly done, and the bold hair strokes reinforce this rushed, somewhat careless feeling.

    The overworked backgrounds are what, in my opinion, really lose these pieces for me. Too dark, too shapeless, too overpowering. Although they DO emphasize your postive space, they are not evenly blended enough, and look somewhat "messy."

    ~M

    Change is Inevitable, Growth is Optional
    I am The Choosen One!
    Jason sez: Draw more from Life!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I see what you're saying about the head/hair for the mike piece. The hands/feet were cut off in the picture I drew it from, I probably could have added them in myself though.

    I agree with you on the chester piece. The hair strokes were done fast. Since his hair was spiky and I was dying to go to sleep but finish the picture, I just made strokes with the charcoal all around. I could have done a better job with the shading aswell, I guess in the end, I was rushing to finish it that night, but I still like it though.

    The thing with me is that I start things but sometimes don't finish them or don't feel like working on them after I've stopped so I try to finish them the time I start drawing it. I'm probably gonna start taking my time with the drawings I do.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London/Cambridge
    Posts
    1,618
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I feel you could push the values on the chester piece.
    Because the black and white range is low, it means that the lines around the eyes seem the same depth as underneath of his neck for example. This contrasted with the very dark background causes the piece too loose depth.

    On the point of Mike i'd also like too add that the body doesn't read too well below the hand, i'm not sure why though, maybe if you posted the reference.

    Nice work!
    -B-

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Here's the pic for the Mike piece.

    Mike & Chester

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    London/Cambridge
    Posts
    1,618
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    No its just as hard on your ref aaw well. Nice work.
    -B-

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    thanks, I'm going to go back and add some darker values to some of the shadows on chester's face.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,186
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    yeah, the head angle in the picture is towards the left, but the one in your drawing is to the right and that's what is giving it that skewed look. i agree with the second piece in where the hair looks rushed, as well as the shading. but everyones said that already so nevermind this post, heh.

    polylover.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    303
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like the mike piece the best...because you have included his whole body..even though chester's face is much better...I think It would have been much cooler if you had included his shoulders.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook