Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Thumbs up Interactive colour wheel

    This is designed for generating Hex code for HTML.
    But it shows colour theory realy well.

    http://wellstyled.com/tools/colorscheme2/index-en.html
    Last edited by andy__artist; June 29th, 2005 at 02:50 PM.


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bologna
    Posts
    1,696
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 108 Times in 101 Posts
    But its not correct exactly. Red is complement to Cyan, and not to green.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Southern CT, USA
    Posts
    565
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Danilo
    But its not correct exactly. Red is complement to Cyan, and not to green.
    I was taught that red & green are complementary colors as well and was curious as to where you might have gotten this information.

    The test I use for complementary colors is that when you mix any 2 complements together, it produces a neutral, grayish color. Mixing red with any variant of blue will produce purple, a secondary color. So cyan couldn't work as a complement to red.
    Mark Hannon
    Art Direction & Design
    Online Portfolio

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    11,708
    Thanks
    2,091
    Thanked 11,429 Times in 2,934 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Danilo
    But its not correct exactly. Red is complement to Cyan, and not to green.
    neither of you are entirely correct...hope this helps.

    it depends what temperature the red is. a cyan is a cool green. so its compliment is a warm red. a cool red will have a warmer green compliment. afterall, compliments are the colors farthest aways from each other in the spectrum...the most different. color is relative.


    j

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bologna
    Posts
    1,696
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 108 Times in 101 Posts
    Well, I know tht colour is something subjective, but this is what I get in Photoshop:

    Interactive colour wheel

    Paint with screen mode.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    919
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 379 Times in 63 Posts
    if you paint with real paint, it's like figure2 said: if you mix two compliments, you will get a grayish tone, depending on the amount of the color. this happens with red and green. if you mix red and blue, you won't get a grayish color but something violet, depending on how much of each color you added to the mix it's a blueish violet, or a reddish violet.

    what you mean, danilo, is limited to the screen, where colors are composed of red, green and blue (RGB)

    i'm no pro, though, I'm sure someone can explain this better

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    350
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    http://wellmadewebs.com/public/atmo/...ht-theory.html

    "Pigments subtract light energy. Lets assume you are looking at pigments (dyes or paints) under a white light....If a pigment is pure red, that means it has absorbed all the green and blue energy from our white light and reflected only the red.

    This system of color mixing with pigments is called the 'Subtractive Color System' because colors are made by 'subtracting' other colors from white light. The 'Subtractive Primaries' are red yellow and blue. That is, you can make all other colors by mixing those three."


    "In computer graphics, as in photography and television, we use a different color system. We are concerned with light sources, not light absorbers. When we work with light sources (colored lights) we add colors to get other colors. For example, we might add equal amounts of red light and blue light to get 'magenta'. So, this is called the 'Additive color system'. Its primary colors are red, green and blue."
    "The proper rewards are not simply tacked on to the activity for which they are given, but are the activity itself in consummation." -C.S. Lewis
    "Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates correction is stupid." -Proverbs 12:1


    Help a CA artist! Visit the Constructive Critique section!
    -Cyrus' Sketchbook-

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Southern CT, USA
    Posts
    565
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Cyrus,

    I didn't know the science behind it but that's pretty much what I learned back in art school. My teachers were exclusively concerned with natural medums and their instruction was based on mixing real pigments and applying them to a real surface.
    Mark Hannon
    Art Direction & Design
    Online Portfolio

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Athens, GA
    Posts
    350
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    I would certainly consider the subtractive color system the more significant of the two, since we can often already see the colors we want and it just becomes a matter of being able to express those effectively. It becomes necessary in many cases, though, to know the additive color system so that you know what colors you should actually be trying to express(examples being an imaginary sunset or a bar with neon blue lights).

    I guess I'm just saying it's one thing to know how to use a pencil, and another to know how to draw one.

    ...

    Got kinda off topic there, but basically yes, green is be the opposite hue of red in terms of painting and what we actually see and respond too.
    Last edited by Cyrus; July 2nd, 2005 at 03:59 PM.
    "The proper rewards are not simply tacked on to the activity for which they are given, but are the activity itself in consummation." -C.S. Lewis
    "Whoever loves discipline loves knowledge, but he who hates correction is stupid." -Proverbs 12:1


    Help a CA artist! Visit the Constructive Critique section!
    -Cyrus' Sketchbook-

  11. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 1,412 Times in 346 Posts
    There are actually FOUR different sets of primaries, with different complimentary relationships, depending on what sort of question is being asked. This may seem confusing, but not having these four straight in your mind in fact makes things far more confusing.

    For ADDITIVE MIXING, red, green and blue lights work as primaries. An example would be the colours that you see if you magnify your monitor screen; I see them as an orange-ish red, a yellowish green and a purplish (ultramarine) blue. These colours work as primaries because each stimulates one of the three types of cones in our eyes more than the other two. The signals from these three types of cones are compared on the way to the brain, and if the three additive primaries are present in the right proportion, the signals can balance each other to give us the sensation of white light; in other proportions they give us the full range of hues and intensities that you see on your monitor.

    For IDEAL SUBTRACTIVE mixing, we would like to have colourants that each transmit/reflect two and only two of these primaries of light, because then each pair of subtractive primaries would have one primary of light in common. Thus, equally balanced the pair would mix to produce that common colour, while in other proportions they could produce a full range of intermediate hues. The ideal subtractive primaries are yellow (transmits red and green, but absorbs blue), red-violet (transmits red and blue, absorbs green), and blue-green (transmits blue and green, absorbs red). These are the CMY of graphics programs, and approximate to the yellow, magenta and cyan dyes used in printing.

    Note that each of the ideal subtractive primaries is the complement of one of the additive primaries. All six are shown in the symmetrical arrangment of the standard colour wheel of graphics programs.

    ARTISTS' PIGMENT mixing is basically subtractive, but the primaries and complementary relationships are a little different to those of ideal subtractive mixing. All artist's pigments, to a greater or lesser extent, have bell-shaped reflectance curves rather than perfect plateau-shaped curves. It turns out that because of this, two pigments can be exactly complementary in terms of the light they give off, but not complementary when physically mixed together. For example, if I paint circular discs with my ultramarine and cad yellow light and spin them together in the right proportions I can get a neutral grey, but if I mix them together I get a distinct green. To get a neutral colour I would have to mix the ultramarine with a more orange-ish colour, and the yellow with a more purplish colour. So the colours shift somewhat into the familiar "artist's colour wheel" arrangement, with yellow opposite purple, orange opposite blue, and red opposite green. Red, yellow and blue pigments turn out to be the best primaries for mixing the fullest range of intermediate colours.

    The PSYCHOLOGICAL colour wheel arranges colours according to how we experience them. Red, yellow, blue and green are seen as "unique" or primary colours, with red-green and yellow-blue being seen as polar opposites.

    The artists' colour wheel, with yellow opposite purple, is really only relevant as a guide for mixing artists pigments. Even then it is only a rough guide: in detail the behaviour of artists pigments depends on their exact absorption curves. The "standard" graphics colour wheel, with the additive primaries opposite the ideal subtractive primaries, is the relevant framework for questions (among many others) involving simultaneous contrast and therefore colour harmony. It is a pity therefore that device mentioned at the start of this thread uses the artists' colour wheel instead.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hudson River valley, NY
    Posts
    16,206
    Thanks
    4,879
    Thanked 16,687 Times in 5,022 Posts
    Briggsy,

    You rule.

    Tristan Elwell
    **Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial

    "Work is more fun than fun."
    -John Cale

    "Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
    -Marc Maron

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Southern CT, USA
    Posts
    565
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by briggsy@ashtons
    The PSYCHOLOGICAL colour wheel arranges colours according to how we experience them. Red, yellow, blue and green are seen as "unique" or primary colours, with red-green and yellow-blue being seen as polar opposites.
    I don't understand how you can include green among the primaries, psychological or not, since it can be broken down into its primary components of blue & yellow. The way I was taught, primary colors are what is left after you can no longer break them down any further. And that leaves only 3: red, yellow & blue.
    Mark Hannon
    Art Direction & Design
    Online Portfolio

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Bologna
    Posts
    1,696
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 108 Times in 101 Posts
    You can brake red on yellow and magenta and blu on cyan and magenta (in case that you use IDEAL SUBTRACTIVE mixing, like briggsy sad). Problem is that pure magenta/violet is realy hard to find, but also see in nature. So red and blu can go as primaries too.
    Last edited by Danilo; July 5th, 2005 at 10:12 AM.

  15. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    201
    Thanked 1,412 Times in 346 Posts

    More on the psychological primaries for figure2

    Of the four psychological primaries, green is the one that causes the most surprise, because the one thing everyone thinks they know about colour is that green is "made" of yellow and blue.

    In fact, if you look into it you will discover that the light reflected by yellow paint is made of wavelengths that individually would look red, orange, yellow and green, while the light that comes off blue paint is dominated by wavelengths that look green, blue and violet. When we mix paints, each component absorbs what it absorbs, and the only thing reflected is what is reflected by both components, in this case green. There, if you are clever at marketing you could sell a whole book based on little more than that revelation. (Oops, sorry. It's already been done).

    But, more to the point, the psychological primaries have got nothing to do with mixing paints: they are the framework of our experience of colour. It is believed that the signals from the three types of cones in the retina are added up and subtracted from each other on the way to the brain to give three signals, one for total lightness, one for yellowness vs blueness, and one for redness vs greenness. When the yellowness and blueness are equally balanced to give a Y/B signal of zero, we experience a pure red, if red is dominant, or a pure green, if green is dominant, or a neutral (white or grey) if the R/G signal is also zero. Similarly for the R/G signal. Other combinations of positive or negative values for the two colour signals give all the other hues we experience. This theory of vision is mainly based on the observations (1) that people can agree closely on what is a red that is neither orange-ish nor purplish, and so on for Y,B and G, but not for other colours such as orange, and (2) that we can not concieve of a single colour that is both red and green, or both yellow and blue. The actual neural mechanism for all this is still being investigated.

    Perhaps this might help. The expression yellowish red conveys the experience of orange. The expression bluish red conveys the experience of magenta. But does the expression yellowish blue really convey the experience of green, or in fact any idea at all?

    Briggsy Rules OK?

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    YUL = MONTREAL !
    Posts
    3,534
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 129 Times in 88 Posts

    Unhappy

    I'm sorry to bring this back up, but I've been thinking a lot about what has been said here. Instead of sending individual PMs with my questions I thought everyone would profit from the answers so here goes :

    briggsy@ashtons : Where did you study colour theory ? I've seen a lot of books -as you mentionned- about it and was wondering which ones would be the most succinct on the topic(s?). Do you have recommendations ? We were recommended an old book on the physics of colour back in college but I can't remember the name of the author... As far as I can remember, he was a physicist exploring the subject but in a approachable manner. Kurt Nassau maybe ?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. colour swatches to colour wheel?
    By NyeAlexandaFrayne in forum Photoshop
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 11th, 2011, 02:30 PM
  2. Colour wheel cs4
    By n00dles in forum Photoshop
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 30th, 2009, 10:13 AM
  3. Nox colour wheel
    By danlambert in forum Photoshop
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 27th, 2008, 02:26 PM
  4. Art: Adobe's interactive color wheel
    By Jason Ross in forum Fine Art
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 15th, 2007, 08:23 PM
  5. Interactive color wheel
    By Sularia in forum REFERENCES & INSPIRATIONS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 1st, 2004, 02:10 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast