Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    What is your approach on painting from grayscale to color?

    The method I've been using at the moment has been to do everything in grayscale and then paint color in on an overlay layer. This inevitably screwed up my colors until I saw a tutorial by Sycra in which he recommends that you reference this color value chart when laying down colors:

    Name:  colourvalueboard.jpg
Views: 5400
Size:  173.2 KB

    Since I'm not totally savvy with photoshop yet (I use CS6), I'm asking if there is another way of going about this. Do you paint from grayscale to color? Why or why not? Is there another method than the one I've mentioned or I just need to practice until I get a subconscious sense of color-value relationships?


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,443
    Thanks
    3,948
    Thanked 6,122 Times in 4,175 Posts
    Why paint twice? Just paint more.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Black Spot For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,139
    Thanks
    2,949
    Thanked 6,242 Times in 2,571 Posts
    That chart you posted is just a mess of bad choices. Color is hue saturation and chroma. When you paint objects all of those attributes shift from light into shadow. Work traditionally and from life if you want to learn about color.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dpaint For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    377
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 199 Times in 142 Posts
    I am learning to use the color layer myself because it makes doing concept work so much easier if I only have to focus on values until I have finalized the concept/composition. It's also much faster. However, I must say that with the exception of a few brilliant artists, I find paintings done with solid colors feel more... I dunno... real.

    Assuming you have decent knowledge of color theory and are concerned specifically with the technique of using a color layer over grayscale, you're just gonna have to work through it until it becomes intuitive. It's not nearly as easy as it looks, you can't just fill in blocks of color like it was a comic book (well you can, but it looks cheap). The hardest part is getting the values right in the first place, regardless of color.
    Do studies from life or photographs until you get the hang of how the color layer behaves. Don't try doing stuff from your imagination yet, you'll just get frustrated and develop bad habits. If you want to ease into it, find a master painting or really awesome photograph and convert it to grayscale. Copy it in grayscale. Then turn the color back on and try to match it using the color layer. Fiddle with the color layer and your grayscale layer (which you'll probably find was much less accurate than you originally thought, because the color layer will brutally expose every flaw) until your copy is an exact match. Do that a couple times and you'll have a far better idea of how color and value relate than by looking at a dinky chart.

    I personally think practice with the color layer is healthy, because it is so finicky about your values. You can kind of get away with fudging the values when using multiply and overlay layers, which is great when you're a pro and know what you're doing, but dangerous to someone still learning value.

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    291
    Thanked 268 Times in 255 Posts
    Have to agree with everyone else: painting colour over greyscale looks horrible.

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,092
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 721 Times in 533 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Umbravita View Post
    Have to agree with everyone else: painting colour over greyscale looks horrible.
    Not really, it is what the old masters did. However, for the beginner it is overly complicated, and it takes a lot of skill and experience to make it work...
    Grinnikend door het leven...

    Sketchbook Blog

  10. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,139
    Thanks
    2,949
    Thanked 6,242 Times in 2,571 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eezacque View Post
    Not really, it is what the old masters did. However, for the beginner it is overly complicated, and it takes a lot of skill and experience to make it work...
    Yes it does look like crap to anyone with any skill or intelligence. No its not what they did. Some of them used glazing but most painted directly with color and all of them understood how to paint with direct color. What people do now is just lazy and ignorant and it doesn't look better because they still lack the bandwidth and discipline to just learn basic color theory.

    People on this forum are always whining that the tools don't matter, only your knowledge and skills do, well that cuts both ways. If you can't learn color theory and you have to find lazy workarounds to fake it then you're right, tools don't matter, your inability and lack of knowledge still shows through all the tech.
    Last edited by dpaint; August 20th, 2014 at 12:49 PM.

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    1,961
    Thanks
    230
    Thanked 822 Times in 478 Posts
    Going from greyscale to colour in digital is simply inefficient (in most cases). You can always have the best of both worlds by putting a desaturation-layer on top of your colour work to check the value read. And if you can't handly painting directly in colour, you won't succeed in "colouring" the greyscale painting, even if the values are correct.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Benedikt For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    291
    Thanked 268 Times in 255 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Benedikt View Post
    Going from greyscale to colour in digital is simply inefficient (in most cases). You can always have the best of both worlds by putting a desaturation-layer on top of your colour work to check the value read. And if you can't handly painting directly in colour, you won't succeed in "colouring" the greyscale painting, even if the values are correct.
    Have to agree with this. A desaturation layer really helps.

    Also, even if the masters did it, it still looks terrible.

  14. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    377
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 199 Times in 142 Posts
    Just to be devil's advocate here, I do think that gray->color has it's place. It's a lot easier to explore and fiddle with a composition from imagination if you can start out by roughing in the grayscale (more important than color anyway in most cases), with maybe a 5 second shoddy color layer over top to test out different color schemes. It's a lot faster at least, and you'll be more willing to make changes if you haven't put in a lot of early effort. From there you can decide whether you want to bring it to a higher level of finish, maybe by repainting with a normal layer using the colored sketch as guidelines. Or you may decide that time is money, and leave it as is. Good enough for concept art. This is a business after all, and using tools to speed the job is not "lazy and ignorant". Even comic book artists now use Sketchup to do all their perspective work.
    At any rate, it's a handy skill and worth learning how to do.

    The real key I think is to make sure you learn your color theory properly, and don't take any shortcuts. Gray->color can be a tempting shortcut to beginners who don't realize it's a lot more complicated than it looks, and can trick them into thinking they understand color when they really don't. Maybe a good guideline is don't try gray->color until you can accurately and repeatedly paint in straight color from life/photos/master copies, then gradually interweave some gray->color work in once you have a solid understanding of color. And whatever you do, do not let it become a crutch.

  15. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,139
    Thanks
    2,949
    Thanked 6,242 Times in 2,571 Posts
    how is it faster than doing it in color once? Its not. you are just making excuses. Yes its a business so you have to have the skill before you get the job then you don't have to waste time doing double the work.

  16. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    861
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 1,405 Times in 343 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eezacque View Post
    Not really, it is what the old masters did. However, for the beginner it is overly complicated, and it takes a lot of skill and experience to make it work...
    The typical approach prior to the second half of the nineteenth century was not painting over greyscale, nor direct painting, but involved variations on the idea of "painting in layers" over a first stage of simplified colouring sometimes known as "dead colouring". For example in his widely imitated manual of 1756 Thomas Bardwell described the first stage of flesh painting using several tints of Light Red (oxide) and white in the lights and a mixed purplish grey "shade tint" in the shadows. In his Guide to Oil Painting of 1845 J. S. Templeton described the "First Painting" as "giving to each object a somewhat slighter or weaker effect of light, shade and colour than it is intended to possess when finished"; "to produce this, the colours used should be as few as possible...". In both descriptions this first stage is followed by more varied tints, glazes and scumbles. (Both texts available here)


    Yet another way to skin a cat.

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to briggsy@ashtons For This Useful Post:


  18. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    377
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 199 Times in 142 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dpaint View Post
    how is it faster than doing it in color once? Its not. you are just making excuses. Yes its a business so you have to have the skill before you get the job then you don't have to waste time doing double the work.
    It's faster sometimes, and not faster others, it depends on the person and the project. If you're willing to sacrifice the subtleties of color and kind of block stuff in just so it reads instead, color over grayscale can be very quick. It can also be very convenient when the painting/concept has not been fully worked out yet, because major changes can be applied to grayscale faster and more simply than working in color. There are many ways of working. I've seen too many professional concept artists that use the technique successfully to say it's useless. Here's one off the top of my head - http://www.jonfoster.com/book-covers.html

    I'm not trying to condone the widespread adoption of the gray->color method here. I still think straight color looks better 95% of the time. I'm just saying it isn't quite a black-and-white issue (heheh).

  19. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    291
    Thanked 268 Times in 255 Posts
    I wouldn't call that successful. Successful to me is good-looking colours. The art is good, but the colours aren't. They're not lifelike at all.

    I mean, colours don't have to be an oversaturated acid trip, but you can tell the difference between lifelike colours that really give a piece some spark and when they... don't.

  20. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    The Big Easy
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    625
    Thanked 699 Times in 368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dpaint View Post
    Yes it does look like crap to anyone with any skill or intelligence. No its not what they did. Some of them used glazing but most painted directly with color and all of them understood how to paint with direct color.
    That really depends on which tradition and time period you are talking about. The dutch masters almost always started with a monochrome to get the chiarro-scurro correct, and then added in color with glaze after glaze. Rembrandt almost always worked that way, and I wouldn't say his works look like crap.

    What people do now is just lazy and ignorant and it doesn't look better because they still lack the bandwidth and discipline to just learn basic color theory.
    Since when does working from grayscale to color not require color theory?

    People on this forum are always whining that the tools don't matter, only your knowledge and skills do, well that cuts both ways. If you can't learn color theory and you have to find lazy workarounds to fake it then you're right, tools don't matter, your inability and lack of knowledge still shows through all the tech.
    Where did anyone say not to learn color theory?

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Help me color this grayscale...
    By Elding in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTER
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 15th, 2013, 07:38 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: December 20th, 2012, 08:46 PM
  3. digital painting- start in grayscale or color?
    By traumgerine in forum ART DlSCUSSION
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: November 21st, 2012, 10:40 PM
  4. (Portrait) Color Palette and Grayscale to color
    By amadarien in forum ART DlSCUSSION
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 26th, 2010, 12:47 AM
  5. Grayscale to Color (?)
    By badass in forum PHOTOSHOP
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 24th, 2009, 03:06 PM

Members who have read this thread: 6

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com