Critiques would be great!

Join 500,000+ Artists

Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Critiques would be great!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    unknown
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I really like what you did with the light coming through the leaves on the fox. But I think you took it a step too far. The saturation of the orange is too high. The composition would be much more beautiful if you lowered it so you could concentrate on the landscape better.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to JoeCowan For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Haifa, Israel
    Posts
    4,124
    Thanks
    2,355
    Thanked 2,323 Times in 1,430 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The dappled light is somehow on the fox, but not on the leaves, tree trunk or most of the grass underneath.

    It's virtually impossible to figure out where the light is coming from. The valley bottom seems lit, but there are no shadows on the clouds or from the clouds, and the mountains on both sides of the valley seem to be in shadow. (Convert the picture to black and white and see for yourself.)

    Plan your lighting better.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to arenhaus For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I wanted the fox to be the focus of the picture, which is why it's so high. I think if I did lower the saturation, I'd also have to add a lot more to the landscape, which is perfectly fine because it's pretty boring anyways. Thank you so much for the help! I won't be editing this but I will keep this information in mind for the next time I draw.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Yeah, I messed up the lighting really bad, I hadn't even considered it until long after I had finished. Next time I'll try making my pictures black and white to make sure everything looks okay, as you suggested. Thank you so much for the help!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    1,493
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked 543 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Adding to what has been said, you're also missing reflected light. If the light is so strong that you get this sort of dappled light effect (which you don't get with an overcast sky), there'll be lots of reflected light in the shadows. On the fox, on the tree, on the fance, everywhere. It wouldn't be this dark, nor this desaturated.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 31

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook