View Poll Results: Which piece is stronger?

1. You may not vote on this poll
  • Plate one

    1 100.00%
  • Plate two

    0 0%
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    San Francisco
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

    Matte Painting "Firecanes"

    Hi, a critique on these pieces would be nice. I am considering moving the "Sun" slightly higher so the lighting is more correct, but I'd like to see your take on this piece. What vibe are you getting out of it, are the textures applied appropriately?

    Plate one
    Name:  redplanetcloseup5102014thumbnale.jpg
Views: 338
Size:  225.8 KB

    Plate two
    Name:  redplanetcloseupthumbna.jpg
Views: 285
Size:  246.4 KB

  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Thanked 103 Times in 94 Posts
    I think the lighting lacks coherence. Basically only that small moon/planet is coherent and gets the proper light.
    Don't forget that in space there are very few sources of diffuse lighting, and since planets are very round, shadows have to get a very 'tight' line, and be very strong. Atmospheres may change this though, but here you've missed some important aspects.

    The rings of that planet need a shadow, and a very strong one too. Also they could have a bit more opacity, but the only reason you would see them is that they get light from the sun, so you won't see anything if they are in the shadow. Cast a shadow on them. Also, you can make them brighter where they get alot of light, but don't forget they can cast their own shadow on the planet, and on themselves.

    The planet on the foreground gets light from the sun, but a bit too much, especially the hidden places. You could use the atmosphere to get some nice effects. Try looking at some pictures online, there's a whole nasa website with an infinite amount of them.

    The planet with the rings requires a much stronger shadow. I know you want it to produce light, but the sun would provide an insane amount of light far greater than anything molten lava can achieve. Keep the light from the lava, but dull it down a bit, and make sure the shadow is stronger.

    The small moon simply needs a more coherent shadow shape compared to the light source.

    I hope this helps get a bit more of a coherent piece. I'm not saying everything must be done exactly, since obviously sometimes design goes over realism, but it's better if it's more believable. The best is if you manage to use everything to help the composition.

Similar Threads

  1. The "Feng Zhu" of Matte Painting?
    By mohq in forum Art Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 1st, 2013, 01:57 PM
  2. Art: "Day's End" matte painting
    By Bad Name in forum Finished Art
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 16th, 2009, 12:24 PM
  3. Art: "Blackhawk Run" - First attempt at Matte Painting
    By Nirox in forum Finished Art
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: January 30th, 2009, 04:38 AM
  4. Art: "Spring Sunset" - matte painting
    By andreasrocha in forum Finished Art
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: December 20th, 2006, 11:06 PM
  5. What makes a painting a "matte painting"?
    By R_M in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 18th, 2003, 09:49 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast