Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 25 of 25
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sweden Malmö
    Posts
    632
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 167 Times in 140 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by haljarrett View Post
    Still think picasso was massively overrated-to me he just basically nicked simplistic tribal art and brought it to the west with a huge pricetag, also dont appreciate the precedent he set by doing it.(its not that there isnt a place for this, just that it didnt have to override everything else to the extent which it did,and kind of does)
    That is what I used to think until I actually started looking at more of his art than just the most famous ones. The man was for lack of better words a genious. (That he also was a bit of a jerk is a whole different matter.

    His artistic journey is spectacular.
    You can find almost all of his artworks here.
    http://www.wikiart.org/en/pablo-pica...n-1936-2#close

    Here is a small selection

    Name:  portrait-of-josep-cardona-1899.jpg
Views: 1049
Size:  368.6 KBName:  still-life-1931.jpg
Views: 1068
Size:  151.2 KBName:  two-figures-1934.jpg
Views: 1113
Size:  308.8 KBName:  three-dancers-1919.jpg
Views: 1124
Size:  425.1 KBName:  house-in-the-garden-1908.jpg
Views: 1091
Size:  186.6 KBName:  yy6253.jpg
Views: 1370
Size:  91.0 KBName:  Pablo_Picasso_PIP004.jpg
Views: 1044
Size:  97.7 KBName:  harlequin-leaning-1909.jpg
Views: 1172
Size:  100.5 KBName:  1256784551_large-image_pablopicasso2173girlbeforeamirror1932large.jpg
Views: 1064
Size:  63.7 KBName:  summer-landscape-1902.jpg
Views: 1102
Size:  264.3 KBName:  mule-1.jpg
Views: 1115
Size:  515.4 KBName:  540c44402458bacd72e8f231340a4184.jpg
Views: 1041
Size:  428.8 KBName:  5775034049_d3ee43f438_z.jpg
Views: 1009
Size:  262.7 KBName:  picasso029.jpg
Views: 1985
Size:  102.9 KBName:  woman-with-mandolin-1925.jpg
Views: 1098
Size:  372.3 KB.


    When it comes to Dali I admire his creativity and skills as a painter. He also has a great range of styles. (He made quite a few cubist paintings himself.)But when it comes to his most famous work like the clocks and the pompous surrealist landscapes something about them just seem gaudy and kitsch to me.
    Last edited by Frida Bergholtz; May 25th, 2014 at 11:14 AM. Reason: clarified a thing


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Frida Bergholtz For This Useful Post:


  4. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22 Times in 15 Posts
    bah humbug!

    okay, granted I do like some of the more impressionist type stuff he produced, still not up there with my favourites though...

    Im interested as to how a surreal landscape can be pompous?

    and thankyou for your reply, I was beginning to worry that this place has become a bit of a ghost town, which would sadden me quite a bit as its been no end of help over the years

    hal

  5. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    339
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked 151 Times in 93 Posts
    I appreciate clear and simple line drawing and sketches even more than before. It's like a short novels i like to read the most instead 300 page books which is often just stretched shorts, chapter after chapter.
    Same principle goes to 3d stuff as i'm doing 3d modelling and animation. i like to watch just plain 3d models with a simple gray material and simple hdri lightning, which gives good understanding of the style, form and effort. Less digital era "smoke and mirrors" in every year (post #15). 90% of commercial entertainment art looks the very same. In comps (front-, mid-, and background in thirds), color palettes, and even subject matters and storytelling. If u take 10 different Korean digital painters, you can see all these insane renderings, but can't tell the difference (in general speaking of course).
    Blah...

  6. #19
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    I had fresh appreciation for Picasso when I had to paint a cubist work for a school project. Cubism is way harder than it looks...especially making it look interesting.

  7. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HonG-t View Post
    I had fresh appreciation for Picasso when I had to paint a cubist work for a school project. Cubism is way harder than it looks...especially making it look interesting.
    I think that part of what made his cubist work so great was that he was a great draftsman in general. It's not like he was painting in a cubism style because he couldn't draw things very realistically, you know? Some of his sketches are incredible. Like he was making the choice to do it a certain way.

  8. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    181
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 39 Times in 38 Posts
    I think my issue with Picasso (other than the aforementioned jerkiness) is that he tries a lot of different styles and movements on for size, but in each of those styles I have trouble locating what he has contributed of himself other than technique, if that makes sense?

    I can see some Surrealism as being a bit on the pompous side, sure. It's like, hey, everybody, come look at me and my psychological hangups and neuroses! They're special because I am an artist!

    Yeah, I really don't like Dali.

  9. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,630
    Thanks
    2,516
    Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,615 Posts
    Sorolla, for one.

    Name:  The-Beach-at-Biarritz-2-large.jpg
Views: 929
Size:  89.3 KB

    Or Craig Mullins.

  10. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    274
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 81 Times in 60 Posts
    When I first started all art was pretty much broken into two categories, art that looks like things and art that doesn't. And in all of those works I knew the things I liked. Now that I am developing my own artistic eye I can pull out more specific details or techniques in pieces to enjoy or critique. Therefor I may not like an artist but I do have an educated appreciation for elements in the piece.

    But there are so many artists now that are amazing for reasons that are much deeper because I am educated. And a deeper understanding and appreciation for good art leads to new discoveries of art almost everyday. But here are a few of my favorite.

    Waterhouse
    Name:  John_William_Waterhouse_The_Lady_of_Shalott.jpg
Views: 998
Size:  554.6 KB

    Wyeth
    Name:  JFPG768.jpg
Views: 4098
Size:  104.4 KB

    Beirstadt
    Name:  On-The-Saco.jpg
Views: 918
Size:  35.0 KB

    I would have liked these before I knew anything about art because they are "pretty". But now I am blown away by them and could stare at the real thing until my legs gave out, then I would sit and study some more.
    ANDREWS WEBSITE I am available for work
    REIGN OF THE GODS strategic fantasy warfare board game

  11. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    211
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
    Lazar Markovich Lissitzky or any Russian constructavism in general, I'm going into graphic desing and when i first saw it I went " greaaaaat a circle in the middle of a page, art hauh?" but after educating myself on some good 'ol art history, damn.


    It made me really look at the design aspects we take for granted, the art was radically different from what came before it, and given the time period carried a ton of metaphors hidden within the designs.

    It wasn't the first instance of clean cut advert like commercial art, but it's pretty darn close to the birth of how our commercialized art looks like right now. For any history nerds out there I really recomend looking up the context behind russian constructivision design.

    Typography in general, Once you go through graphic design it's like taking the red pill...you start noticing letters EVERYWHERE, I've never been so happy or irritated at street side signs in my life.

    Also pointalism...oh look a bunch of dots.....alot harder than it looks, on the same thought imressionism, maybe Claude Monet's bridge over a pond of water lilies doesn't look too great...until you realize how big it is in reality( how can you make something so cool if you can't even see what you're doing as a whole?).

    I can go on for days....I'll let myself out.
    Last edited by Mraukat; July 22nd, 2014 at 07:08 PM.

  12. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    403
    Thanks
    197
    Thanked 249 Times in 147 Posts
    Appreciate more: Monet, and lots of the impressionists and pointillists. They do some pretty interesting things with optical tricks! (See Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing — fascinating book, recommend to everyone.) Also Michelangelo, after seeing an exhibit of his sketches.

    Appreciate less: Leonardo da Vinci. Not because he wasn't incredible for his time, but because he was limited by the knowledge and technology of his time: it irks me when people say his work is better than modern artists just because he was an 'old master'. Give me Bouguereau over da Vinci any day.
    Sketchbook | Composition tutorial
    @LulieArt - Twitter, where I post useful links, tips, and neat art-related things I stumble across.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Lulie For This Useful Post:


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 31st, 2009, 10:48 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast