Results 1 to 15 of 46
Thread: Fincks - Composition 1.1
March 8th, 2014 #1
Fincks - Composition 1.1
Here is my first study :
I don't really know what to say about this painting of Corot.
I like the economy in the sky. It creates a contraste with all the little detail in the city and emphasize the focal point of the piece.
The repetition of suggested detail with simple forms add a lot of rythm throughout the piece.
The forms are simple, lots of diffenret grey, it was a good first study for this challenge.
Last edited by Fincks; March 8th, 2014 at 12:39 PM.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 9th, 2014 #2
Second one, from yesterday. I wanted to work on the economy of my brushwork.
I like the contrast on his clothe. It set a clear line between the head and the body.
There is the same grey value on his hair and his torso to emphasize the head.
Last edited by Fincks; March 9th, 2014 at 11:00 PM.
March 10th, 2014 #3
you are really close on these. watch your shapes, as yours have a bit more variation than we need to see, and flipping the images vertically and horizontally and checking shapes in your peripheral vision will help resolve the differences in positive and negative shapes. on the second image your light on the face is a little bit stronger and more high key than the original. the biggest area to focus on is your shape mapping early on. try to be as honest as you can be about those shapes.
keep up the great work.
jJoin us and get better at art, starting today! LEVEL UP! - at ConceptArt.Org
March 15th, 2014 #4
@Jason : Thanks. I think I need to really take my time when I'm mapping the shapes. I made the same mistake in this one below, trying to be fast. I'll try to do it step by step next time, one layer or one group for foreground/middleground/background, something like this, that will help me process all the info without being overwhelmed.
About 1 hour, didn't want to go into detail, just placing the shapes but an extra 30min wouldn't hurt. I really struggle when there is a lot of information like in the rock zone, I don't know how to "start".
I really like the mood and the fact that the value in the foreground and in the sky are practically the same. The rocks lead the eye to the fisherman who stands out thanks to the dark shadow behind him. There is a high contraste in value and in texture between the left and right side of the canvas which actually lead my eyes automatically to the fishing rod.
Around 4h, it's lacking of some sharp edges.
Frazetta leads the eye to the focus of the piece with the trunk of the tree. He emphasizes the girl with the contrast of the light value of the moon and her hair. She really stands out thanks to the shading.
The eye is blocked by the dark values in the top right corner and the branches. If your eye follow her harm, it leads to the branch, that leads to the left side of the canvas, bringing us back to the girl thanks to the other trunk. (meeting the monkey on your way)
Last edited by Fincks; March 16th, 2014 at 09:36 PM.
March 16th, 2014 #5
A bit more than 1 hour.
More simple than the other ones. I tried to be effective and work in a small format.
I like the shading of this piece. The shadow in the foreground force the eye to look farther in the horizon which seems to be the ideal way to enjoy a landscape.
He uses the man, the trees on the right and the cows in the background to emphasize the depth of the landscape.
And does the same with light/dark outlines on the hills.
March 17th, 2014 #6
A bit more than 1 hour again, working in a small format. I might try a harder brush for the next one.
I think I should have detailed the house as it is the focus of the piece. I'm starting to understand how effective it can be to really render the focus of the piece and let the rest rough.
Again, a dark foreground that forces the eye to look further. The house is stuck between two dark values from both sides, and is emphasized by a ground lighter than everywhere else in the piece.
The tree next to her breaks the line we have by being taller than the other trees which give more focus to the house.
March 17th, 2014 #7
you are doing great. keep pushing your shapes, values and edges even closer to the originals...you are on the right track. just gotta push that extra five percent and you have this under control.Join us and get better at art, starting today! LEVEL UP! - at ConceptArt.Org
March 19th, 2014 #8
@ Jason : Thanks. Yeah I think now I need to pay more attention and zoom in sometimes.
Around 1h I think. I'm starting to pay more attention to sharp edges.
Last edited by Fincks; March 22nd, 2014 at 11:41 PM.
March 20th, 2014 #9
Another one from Thomas Cole.
Around 2h, trying to concentrate on the sharp edges. Thomas Cole paintings have usually a lot of sharpness and highlights, so they are very good exercise.
Some values might be a bit too light or too dark. I wanted to work on the shapes and the edges more than on the global feeling and the mood of the painting.
Last edited by Fincks; March 21st, 2014 at 02:29 PM.
March 21st, 2014 #10
Around 3h. I had a hard time on this one with all the shapes. Especially with the clouds.
March 21st, 2014 #11
Last study for today, around 2 hours.
March 22nd, 2014 #12
Hey these are really good!
On this last one, the value difference on the girl's face really stands out, but other than that you've got some impressive studies here!
The Following User Says Thank You to Agerkvist For This Useful Post:
March 22nd, 2014 #13
Great studies! The attention to edges is really paying off-- there's a very noticable improvement over those last 5 images.
Keep up the awesome work, your progress is inspiring!
The Following User Says Thank You to aolian For This Useful Post:
March 22nd, 2014 #14
@Agerkvist : Thanks, nice to hear that :B.
Now that sou say it ! I think it really stands out because the value on the girls face is too close from the one from the sky.
@aolian : Thanks . I went gradually since the fifth one, carefully choosing my studies so that I would improve step by step. (5/6 for the shapes, 7/8 for the edges, 9/10 for the values)
The Bierstadt study uses really dark greys whereas the last one uses light greys.
I lost a bit of edges in the Bierstadt study. I paid too much attention to the values/mood and couldn't work on both.
Now I need to apply the shapes, values and edges in my next studies.
The next one will probably be a Peder Mork Monsted (check his stuff, he is a god). Might be too hard but perfect to combine all this knowledge.
I hope I will be able to synthesize what I've learned so far, combine it and apply it in different steps, in the next ten studies.
Mapping out the shapes first etc
Last edited by Fincks; March 22nd, 2014 at 11:52 PM.
March 22nd, 2014 #15
I really like what you did there with the trunk of the tree in the Franzetta study of the girl. I feel like it's really growing and sloping along in the picture.My sketchbook: http://www.conceptart.org/forums/sho...530&viewfull=1
My Deviantart: http://gimchi.deviantart.com/
There are no members to list at the moment.
By dbw in forum Composition 1.1Replies: 42Last Post: March 13th, 2015, 02:07 PM
Art: CompositionBy Erin_Something in forum FINE ARTReplies: 1Last Post: September 12th, 2010, 01:26 AM
By clifFroth in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 6Last Post: September 5th, 2010, 03:32 PM
By dreamTech in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 7Last Post: August 10th, 2010, 02:58 PM
By dux in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 6Last Post: December 17th, 2004, 08:54 PM