Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast
Results 118 to 130 of 135

Thread: America and the need to own a weapon

  1. #118
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LaCan View Post
    This is extremely naive view. Currently implemented financial system is much more than money as a medium of exchange. The concept of "financial instrument" caters to precisely that - owning money for its own sake.
    while im flattered that you seem happy to nitpick quite minor side points just to have something to say, youre confusing money with debt. money is scalar, debt is vector. financial instruments are contstructs made from credit or conversely, from debt, promises to pay..
    ie directional flows of money. one does not own money 'for its own sake' one owns it in the hope that its value as debt or assetswill increase and one will make a profit. modern banking is the manipulation of debt. the practice of applying monetary value to objects is called the market. we're drifting.

    "Tech doesn't matter, neither does how many people there are or what century we are in."

    you say that like a fact. its not a fact. there are 100 times as many people in america now, 100 times. and in their hands can be devices which can kill hundreds in minutes. there are now polie helicopters. tech does matter. you know it.

    "
    The copper on the US penny costs more than the penny is worth."

    any kid who likes science knows pennies made since the early 80s contain mostly nickle, and in the uk iron (and are ferromagnetic). never the less, if pennies were made from copper, which they arnt, but if they were,,,
    copper at current prices is $7000 per tonne. thats $7 per kilo, or $.007 per gram. a penny, made pre 1980-odd weighs about 3 grams. sooo, if you made a pre1980s penny for some reason, 3.1g x $0.007 = $.0217. quite the bargain, BUT
    after 1982, cheaper filler materials were used (97% nickle) and the weight was trimmed to 2.5 grams, so modern ones are not worth pure copper prices for scrap.
    myth, sort of busted.

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; September 1st, 2013 at 01:21 AM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #119
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    your confusing money with debt. money is scalar, debt is vector. financial instruments are contstructs made from credit and debt, ie directional flows of money.
    I'm not confusing anything. I said that financial system allows for much more intricate interpretation of money than your primer definition. Money (and debt if you insist) we're talking about are concepts, not quantificators. Your statement/distinction is thus irrelevant. Exact definition and leeway of money is mutable, depending on the implemented framework.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #120
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    So-Cal
    Posts
    3,426
    Thanks
    2,994
    Thanked 1,779 Times in 850 Posts
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #121
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    financial instruments are contstructs made from credit or conversely, from debt, promises to pay..
    You sure you've read and understood your finance 101? Equity instruments such as stock, for example, have nothing to do with either debt or credit. Not even majority of derivative instruments are debt based.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #122
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #123
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    [URL]LaCan, guns?
    You're strawmaning Jefferson's wisdom into banality. What he stated there was meant to be universal, at least in the context of a republic. It would apply even if the state of the art personal weapon was a nuke.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #124
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    I simply meant if you really had your little heart set on bamboozling me with financial jargon, start a Money thread. long words confuse me tho, b warned.

    I honestly had no idea Jefferson had such strange views on personal apocalyptically powerful weapons invented long after his death being the cornerstone of freedom. are you sure you arnt quoting the Tyrant Leto II, as i was?

    "Technology breeds anarchy and distributes its tools at random... the ability to make and use savage destroyers falls inevitably into the hands of smaller and smaller groups until at last the group is a single individual"

    i guess if you want to be free in the Timothy McVeigh sense, ie you get to choose when you die and how many you kill, your warped version of Jefferson's philosophy is well worth following.
    If on the other hand you want to live in a society where children are not slain routinely by psychotics in their school rooms, you might consider an attitude adjustment.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #125
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    I simply meant if you really had your little heart set on bamboozling me with financial jargon, start a Money thread. long words confuse me tho, b warned.
    You started the money thing. Now be a man and at least read the wikipedia entries on "money" and "financial instrument".

    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    I honestly had no idea Jefferson had such strange views on personal apocalyptically powerful weapons invented long after his death being the cornerstone of freedom. are you sure you arnt quoting the Tyrant Leto II, as i was?
    Jefferson's statement is about personal liberties. It deems them autonomous of political, technological, psychological, or <insert your fixation here> context of the day.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #126
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LaCan View Post
    Jefferson's statement is about personal liberties. It deems them autonomous of political, technological, psychological, or <insert your fixation here> context of the day.
    I somehow doubt he would be dogmatic to the absurd degree you seem to feel completely normal. you expect me to believe a mind as nimble as his would paint himself into such a preposterous, violent corner? Can you actually imagine Jefferson insisting personal weapons capable of murdering tens to millions of people are critical for liberty? mental.

    Quote Originally Posted by LaCan View Post
    You started the money thing. Now be a man and at least read the wikipedia entries on "money" and "financial instrument".

    oo impuning my manhood, im shrivelling palpably as i type! please dont hit me i bet youve got a right hook like a rocket!
    ok lets read:

    Money is any object or record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts in a given socio-economic context or country.[1][2][3] The main functions of money are distinguished as: a medium of exchange; a unit of account; a store of value; and, occasionally in the past, a standard of deferred payment.[4][5] Any kind of object or secure verifiable record that fulfills these functions can be considered money. Money is historically an emergent market phenomenon establishing a commodity money, but nearly all contemporary money systems are based on fiat money.[4] Fiat money, like any check or note of debt, is without intrinsic use value as a physical commodity.-Wikipedia

    Kind of exactly what I said already.
    I suppose some people do collect money as an object; archeologists, coin collectors who collect collections of coins, people making floors from pennies. you schooled me good.. not.
    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; September 1st, 2013 at 05:26 PM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. #127
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    I somehow doubt he would be dogmatic to the absurd degree you seem to feel completely normal. you expect me to believe a mind as nimble as his would paint himself into such a preposterous, violent corner? Can you actually imagine Jefferson insisting personal weapons capable of murdering tens to millions of people are critical for liberty? mental.
    Seems you completely missed the point, of both; Jefferson's remark and my reductio ad absurdum.

    I'm leaving you to your hamster wheel.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  12. #128
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    I told you long words confuse me, especially ones in languages I dont know. Ductape and absurdums? What you mean is you tried to make your point by saying something absolutely ridiculous, pinning it on Jefferson, I called your bluff and rather than fight the corner youd painted yourself into youre storming off in a huff. s'long.
    shut the cage door on the way out please, the vast new conceptual worlds your ideas open for me are too threatening.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #129
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    312
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post
    I told you long words confuse me, especially ones in languages I dont know. Ductape and absurdums? What you mean is you tried to make your point by saying something absolutely ridiculous, pinning it on Jefferson, I called your bluff and rather than fight the corner youd painted yourself into youre storming off in a huff. s'long.
    shut the cage door on the way out please, the vast new conceptual worlds your ideas open for me are too threatening.
    Sigh. I'll bite, but just a little. I feel a bit silly having to explain this to supposedly intelligent person (or a child, judging from your last few neener-neener posts).

    Out of the respect for your disability with abstractions, I'll try not to use any abstract concepts except "power". If you have problem understanding even this concept, there's no need to proceed to the next paragraph. Instead, read only this: "Touche! You win! I stand corrected."

    Jefferson's statement is about power. Not about weapons. Specifically, about keeping the concentrated power in line. He talks about state power but it's easy to see how this applies to power originating from other places, like religious or corporate power. He advocates use of any means possible to contain such power should it become corrupted. If you think the quote is about weapons because he used phrasing "let them take arms", you may be suffering from a bad case of not seeing the wood for the trees. The thing you obsessed much, namely the type of "arms" Jefferson supposedly had in mind, is not important for the gist of the idea he is presenting here. "Arms" here may as well be replaced by any type of counter-power available to the opponents of the corrupt power; words, political pressure, disobedience, musquettes, assault rifles or something entirely different. As long as it's effective in the domain of power. Try it out for yourself. Replace the word "arms" in Jefferson's quote with any of these other words. See if it affects the main idea in any way.

    Weapons debate interest me only in context of this balancing game between concentrated power (state) and opposed distributed power ("the people"). I'm not interested in wallowing in the mud of prepackaged "left-vs-right" quarrel about weapons. I specifically don't care about generic "just think of the children" type of argument you're tossing around. This type of argument is manipulation-prone. It appeals to emotion and can be fudged to ban just about anything. Cannabis? It's a gateway drug to heroin. You know how many children die of heroin each year? Pornography?.. Hate speech?.. Abortion?.. etc...

    So if you're willing and able to broaden the discussion framing to the problems of power - I'm in. Otherwise, I couldn't care less.

    Please, reflect a bit on things instead of instantly blazing out to keyboard in a childish manner. Let me know if there were any too long words that confused you. I can simplify further.
    Last edited by LaCan; September 2nd, 2013 at 02:14 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. #130
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,459
    Thanks
    6,453
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,459 Posts
    be prepared not to care less then.

    You correctly pointed out these issues are subject to emotive manipulation, but then assault rifled yourself in the foot by being so desperate and obvious to use that manipulation to drag this out into wide, marshy abstract areas where one opinion is as valid as any other, value judgements are almost impossible and any debate is 100% emotional. im more interested in facts. heres some:
    the examples you fired off like a Cheney on a duckshoot as no-brainer Bad Things are anything but. Cannabis being a gateway drug;? Myth. a myth propagated by people like you who fire it off without checking your facts, in fact. Fact. Youre saying its easily fudged, well, sure, so turn to the stats.
    ive no idea 'how many children die from heroine' but im glad heroine is extremely illegal, or it would be many more. I think all guns should be extremely illegal too, which is why i live in a largely peaceful place where guns are banned, gun murders are niil per year locally and maybe in the double digits nationally. Im not sure what the sentence "Pornography?" is meant to mean except as an emotional trigger. Hate speech IS banned dipshit. Abortion, you literally only threw that in there as an emotional hot potato. For the record Im pretty confident in my stance that women should be allowed to control their reproductive biology as a right enshrined in law. This is after all about personal freedom isnt it?
    The point being these things you feel are so easily fudged are only so because people ignore the actual social science and wander off into emotional policy.
    As for your left-right divide, i also do not care which end your favourite guy eats his eggs from, theyre all as bad as eachother. I watch house of cards, im practically a doctor of political science now.

    "I specifically don't care about generic "just think of the children""

    it amazes me how completely ok americans are with kids being massacred in their schools. its very odd.

    Power, I think i can understand. I dont ever want to own a pet I cant kill with my own two hands if I have to. Im sorry to break this to you tho, but at least in regard to gun ownership, while your power is dramatically increased vs someone unarmed ie You have total power over them, and the results are your country's horrific gun murder rate, on the other hand, having that silly gun will help you very little if the other side controls stealth bombers.
    both aspects reinforce what ive been saying. Guns are useless against the government, and destructive in cities. the fact that you see assault rifles and political pressure, disobedience and words as part of the same liberty-ensuring entity is deeply disturbing.
    Like several of the other americans here, you literally think owning a metal box that can accelerate a metal slug from one end to sonic speed and thence through someones face = liberty. youre sick. your country is sick.
    Youve noticed quite a lot of places are peaceful prosperous and free and yet ban guns right? How do you explain this?

    Id prefer to keep this to the specific topic in the title and not expand out into vague philosophical spaces where you are no doubt hoping ill follow so you can throw some fucking Kierkegaard or something at me.
    Show me the stats that banning guns would cause more harm than it would prevent and you will have won a convert (as counter i present the school attack rate since Dunblaine). Otherwise LaCan it.
    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; September 2nd, 2013 at 03:19 PM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DSG 666: Weapon: Plasma weapon based tank
    By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: February 24th, 2005, 11:51 AM
  2. DSG 648: Weapon: Claw-styled weapon
    By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2005, 11:20 PM
  3. DSG 470: Weapon: A blunt medievil weapon
    By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: July 24th, 2004, 04:48 AM
  4. DSG 456: Weapon: Weapon that devours/consumes souls
    By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: July 11th, 2004, 10:32 AM
  5. DSG 390: Weapon: Weapon made of bone(s)
    By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: April 5th, 2004, 03:42 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook