Results 16 to 17 of 17
June 11th, 2013 #16
Sounds like we might agree a little Armand. The level of pro comment had to do with comparing work not being a good measure of being professional. All my comments were directed at comparisons not working in calling oneself a pro. Making money or a living is actually the only tangible measure of calling oneself a pro.
The problem in defining it solely as making a living is that there are many levels of making a living. I can live on the street and do drawings of tourists and make just enough to feed myself and drink beer and be called a pro. So hustle then would define pro and not quality? An interesting discussion but I don't think it's all that black and white in my head. I worked full time as a security guard for years but would never call myself a professional law enforcement guy. Maybe at the time technically you could cal me that but I never felt like I was a pro. Anyway, black and white definitions are too easy for CA.
Last edited by bcarman; June 11th, 2013 at 11:26 AM.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberJune 11th, 2013 #17
I think dpaint is right and 'pro' refers to a way of making living, but bears no measure of quality.
Professionals do have a certain job acceptance standard, but in such a subjective business like this one, that really doesn't mean much, if anything.
However, a distinction must be made between profession and vocation.
One can be a painter by vocation, but not by profession and the other way around.
By Gatsby216 in forum ART DlSCUSSIONReplies: 6Last Post: February 24th, 2013, 10:42 PM
By subversive-imaginati in forum ART DlSCUSSIONReplies: 6Last Post: May 22nd, 2008, 09:18 AM
By Designer Trey in forum ARTISTS LOOKING FOR WORK!Replies: 0Last Post: May 23rd, 2006, 04:24 PM
By Level_Designer in forum ARTISTS LOOKING FOR WORK!Replies: 0Last Post: April 23rd, 2006, 07:49 PM
By bmcbay in forum FINISHED ART & ARTWORKReplies: 7Last Post: March 24th, 2006, 01:53 AM