Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Requesting critique

    Hi @ all

    I am currently working on a new portfolio-piece, which is very important to me, having some trouble with it.

    I started with a value-sketch, and added more colors and details on top. I get the feeling the more I work on it, the less the different elements fit together. Resulting that I have overpainted things over and over again. I don´t exactly see if this has someting to do with the colors, light or composition. I feel that the lower part kinda works in terms of balance, but the stuff with the clouds not.

    Maybe you people have some advices? Any help is deeply appreciated!

    Current state of work:

    Name:  The Way of the Water4.jpg
Views: 747
Size:  299.2 KB

    Some steps:

    Name:  steps01.jpg
Views: 746
Size:  388.7 KB
    Last edited by Nurkhular; April 4th, 2013 at 05:59 AM.


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,492
    Thanks
    307
    Thanked 410 Times in 310 Posts
    I think this is lovely, though I wonder if you havent lost the strong light composition by softening the values on the lefthand cliff.

    It doesn't need much but maybe if you darken that down again, or go the opposite way of darkening the righthand cliff and foreground figures further to bring that side forward, would help with how it reads overall.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    canada, from russia
    Posts
    3,369
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 443 Times in 357 Posts
    The image you have labeled as "current state of work" seems to be lying since step 3 of the process has more finished elements. I like the way step 3 looks a lot, the colors seem to look a lot better together then in the image you labeled as current.

    Really great, sophisticated image. I wish I could offer any critique, but I can't find anything.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    @ Chandra: Thanks for the advice. I think that I am going to darken down the left side a bit more, the other way around would be really complicated.
    @ Pavel: Thanks man! Actually the image was nearly finished with step 3. But the more I looked to it, the more unsatifsied I was with the work. The colours seemd to be so washed out and dull. So I decided to overpaint things to get the colour mood stronger. The rendering level is not far in this current version.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    canada, from russia
    Posts
    3,369
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 443 Times in 357 Posts
    Oh. I hate to do this to you as this often happened to me, but I like how it was looking in step 3 much more then your current state. The colors were not overstated but still had a strong heavenly feel. In the new version they seem overstated and heavy.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    369
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 345 Times in 113 Posts
    Nice overall idea, but the perspective seems completely broken. It feels more like a collage than a spatial continuum. If you wish to increase the unity of the image, first construct the scene properly in perspective and then unify the color scheme via lighting.

    Name:  a1.jpg
Views: 545
Size:  144.3 KB

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to LaCan For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
    for me I feel like the piece is lacking a selling point. I'm not sure what the most important piece of this painting is. Nothing feels like its being showcased. It's a very busy piece with lots and lots of stuff going on. nothing feels overwhelmingly large or small. To you, what is the story in this piece? what do you want the selling point to be?
    -start a revolution.

    AnimationSamurai.com

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,630
    Thanks
    2,515
    Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,615 Posts
    The composition, lighting, values, perspective are all over the place: there is way, way too much detail and texture here and not nearly enough clarity and readability. It's an issue with a lot of modern concept art, but it's taken to the extreme here: too much baroque swirls and cacophony, not enough composition and harmony.

    You ought to change the overall contrast to highlight the main elements, rework the value composition so it reduces into a smaller number of cohesive shapes, and reduce detail in areas that are not central to your story.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to arenhaus For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    @ LaCan: Thanks for the feedback! I didn´t worked with a perspective grid in this picture from the start. This was a big mistake!
    @ Daniel: Thanks! Not too much story involved in this one. When I do personal pieces, I like the idea of developing a story during the painting process. First it was a lost valley with asian influences, then I added more cloud shapes and superantural elements to get an epic feel for the picture. This way of approach often works for me personally. But in this one, I kinda lost the way completely.
    @ arenhaus: You´re right! Your feedback was a real eye opener. I decided to throw everything over board that is not working. About 95% of the picture XD Sometimes it is better to start fresh, instead of working on broken basics.

    This is what I did now: Going back to composition fundamentals and perspective. The only thing I really want to keep are the characters, a part of the river. And the idea of asian architecture combined with a dramatic sky. Here is my new approach:

    Name:  wip03.jpg
Views: 482
Size:  259.7 KB

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    464
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 98 Times in 74 Posts
    That looks so simplistic and same old compared to what you where first going for. It was a really interesting take on three point perspective, you could see the upward view and awe of the guy in front. I suggest you challenge yourself with that composition, and when you get it right it will make the piece all the more powerful.

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    122
    Thanked 91 Times in 83 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by J.R.Hollis View Post
    That looks so simplistic and same old compared to what you where first going for. It was a really interesting take on three point perspective, you could see the upward view and awe of the guy in front. I suggest you challenge yourself with that composition, and when you get it right it will make the piece all the more powerful.
    Totally agree with this. The piece went from having amazing potential to just good potential in my eyes.

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    113
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
    Agree with previous two posts. You loose a lot of dynamic quality by simplifying it to two point. I think what LaCan was pointing out was to get the two lower vanishing points figured out.
    Michael Dickerson

    portfolio

    sketch blog

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    1,715
    Thanks
    3,217
    Thanked 669 Times in 496 Posts
    I'll get in the wagon and say that simplifying it to two point perspective its really killing it. Figure out the three point properly and you'll have a wonderful piece.
    気計 - Quike
    "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.."

    The Spaniard's Sketchbook... No holds barred

  17. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
    i disagree, complex is not always better. The most recent version is beautiful, simple, and i can take in the piece, my eye travels comfortably through the composition, and I don't get lost or confused. You should always have a story that you want to tell, but aside from that, I think its a great improvement compositionally.
    -start a revolution.

    AnimationSamurai.com

  18. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
    The original concept is way more dramatic than the new version. If ver1 and ver2 will be side by side, my attention will definitely be drawn to the first composition.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Portrait - Requesting critique!
    By NikiPaprika in forum Art Critique Center
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 3rd, 2012, 04:09 AM
  2. Art: Requesting critique
    By Undercurrent in forum Entertainment, Design & Concept Art
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: June 15th, 2012, 08:44 PM
  3. Requesting Critique
    By reachm in forum Art Critique Center
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: December 20th, 2009, 09:09 PM
  4. Newbie requesting critique
    By Illogical Lynx in forum Art Critique Center
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: April 18th, 2009, 01:43 AM
  5. Art: Requesting open critique please
    By fundesign in forum Finished Art
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 3rd, 2004, 11:34 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast