Requesting critique

Join 500,000+ Artists

Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Requesting critique

    Hi @ all

    I am currently working on a new portfolio-piece, which is very important to me, having some trouble with it.

    I started with a value-sketch, and added more colors and details on top. I get the feeling the more I work on it, the less the different elements fit together. Resulting that I have overpainted things over and over again. I don´t exactly see if this has someting to do with the colors, light or composition. I feel that the lower part kinda works in terms of balance, but the stuff with the clouds not.

    Maybe you people have some advices? Any help is deeply appreciated!

    Current state of work:

    Name:  The Way of the Water4.jpg
Views: 492
Size:  299.2 KB

    Some steps:

    Name:  steps01.jpg
Views: 487
Size:  388.7 KB

    Last edited by Nurkhular; April 4th, 2013 at 05:59 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,358
    Thanks
    242
    Thanked 356 Times in 276 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I think this is lovely, though I wonder if you havent lost the strong light composition by softening the values on the lefthand cliff.

    It doesn't need much but maybe if you darken that down again, or go the opposite way of darkening the righthand cliff and foreground figures further to bring that side forward, would help with how it reads overall.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    canada, from russia
    Posts
    3,370
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 443 Times in 357 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The image you have labeled as "current state of work" seems to be lying since step 3 of the process has more finished elements. I like the way step 3 looks a lot, the colors seem to look a lot better together then in the image you labeled as current.

    Really great, sophisticated image. I wish I could offer any critique, but I can't find anything.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    @ Chandra: Thanks for the advice. I think that I am going to darken down the left side a bit more, the other way around would be really complicated.
    @ Pavel: Thanks man! Actually the image was nearly finished with step 3. But the more I looked to it, the more unsatifsied I was with the work. The colours seemd to be so washed out and dull. So I decided to overpaint things to get the colour mood stronger. The rendering level is not far in this current version.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    canada, from russia
    Posts
    3,370
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 443 Times in 357 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Oh. I hate to do this to you as this often happened to me, but I like how it was looking in step 3 much more then your current state. The colors were not overstated but still had a strong heavenly feel. In the new version they seem overstated and heavy.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    314
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 295 Times in 90 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Nice overall idea, but the perspective seems completely broken. It feels more like a collage than a spatial continuum. If you wish to increase the unity of the image, first construct the scene properly in perspective and then unify the color scheme via lighting.

    Name:  a1.jpg
Views: 306
Size:  144.3 KB

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to LaCan For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    for me I feel like the piece is lacking a selling point. I'm not sure what the most important piece of this painting is. Nothing feels like its being showcased. It's a very busy piece with lots and lots of stuff going on. nothing feels overwhelmingly large or small. To you, what is the story in this piece? what do you want the selling point to be?

    -start a revolution.

    AnimationSamurai.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Haifa, Israel
    Posts
    4,108
    Thanks
    2,350
    Thanked 2,317 Times in 1,425 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The composition, lighting, values, perspective are all over the place: there is way, way too much detail and texture here and not nearly enough clarity and readability. It's an issue with a lot of modern concept art, but it's taken to the extreme here: too much baroque swirls and cacophony, not enough composition and harmony.

    You ought to change the overall contrast to highlight the main elements, rework the value composition so it reduces into a smaller number of cohesive shapes, and reduce detail in areas that are not central to your story.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to arenhaus For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    @ LaCan: Thanks for the feedback! I didn´t worked with a perspective grid in this picture from the start. This was a big mistake!
    @ Daniel: Thanks! Not too much story involved in this one. When I do personal pieces, I like the idea of developing a story during the painting process. First it was a lost valley with asian influences, then I added more cloud shapes and superantural elements to get an epic feel for the picture. This way of approach often works for me personally. But in this one, I kinda lost the way completely.
    @ arenhaus: You´re right! Your feedback was a real eye opener. I decided to throw everything over board that is not working. About 95% of the picture XD Sometimes it is better to start fresh, instead of working on broken basics.

    This is what I did now: Going back to composition fundamentals and perspective. The only thing I really want to keep are the characters, a part of the river. And the idea of asian architecture combined with a dramatic sky. Here is my new approach:

    Name:  wip03.jpg
Views: 224
Size:  259.7 KB

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    347
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 81 Times in 59 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    That looks so simplistic and same old compared to what you where first going for. It was a really interesting take on three point perspective, you could see the upward view and awe of the guy in front. I suggest you challenge yourself with that composition, and when you get it right it will make the piece all the more powerful.

    Sketchbooks:
    Virtual Sprite - New
    Cali to SC, The Joshua Hollis Story - Old

    W.I.P. Threads:
    By Crom! - Done
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    308
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 37 Times in 34 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by J.R.Hollis View Post
    That looks so simplistic and same old compared to what you where first going for. It was a really interesting take on three point perspective, you could see the upward view and awe of the guy in front. I suggest you challenge yourself with that composition, and when you get it right it will make the piece all the more powerful.
    Totally agree with this. The piece went from having amazing potential to just good potential in my eyes.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    113
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Agree with previous two posts. You loose a lot of dynamic quality by simplifying it to two point. I think what LaCan was pointing out was to get the two lower vanishing points figured out.

    Michael Dickerson

    portfolio

    sketch blog
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    1,696
    Thanks
    3,149
    Thanked 663 Times in 491 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    I'll get in the wagon and say that simplifying it to two point perspective its really killing it. Figure out the three point properly and you'll have a wonderful piece.

    気計 - Quike
    "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.."

    The Spaniard's Sketchbook... No holds barred
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  17. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    178
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 84 Times in 52 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    i disagree, complex is not always better. The most recent version is beautiful, simple, and i can take in the piece, my eye travels comfortably through the composition, and I don't get lost or confused. You should always have a story that you want to tell, but aside from that, I think its a great improvement compositionally.

    -start a revolution.

    AnimationSamurai.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The original concept is way more dramatic than the new version. If ver1 and ver2 will be side by side, my attention will definitely be drawn to the first composition.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  19. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I can't really speak for the new version since it's in such an early stage. But I did want to say that I very much like your Version 3 painting, although the eye was led more to the mountain as apposed to the "Current state of work" redo which changes the focal point to the two elemental figures. I honestly would have picked one of those compositions and finished it up and then moved on. You obviously know how to paint quite well so this new piece that you're working on I'm sure will be good too, but I think it should be just that: a new and separate piece. I don't really see the point in scrapping the entire original painting unless you're dead set on a particular narrative, and that wasn't doing it for you.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook