Until we know full details I still resign judgement. Now more than ever in light of new issues, especially since CA.org has nothing to do with any of it. One man, who worked at a company who may or may not have been contacted when he was still in a position to do anything about it is.
Which makes me wonder even more if this is the case because once again quoting Brad
Whatever information he heard said that Manley isn't even affiliated with TAD. So once again, did Brad contact Jason when he without a doubt had some sort of control over it in TAD. That being the only real point I'm curious of.I think what *is* my responsibility is to make clear is that TAD is no longer affiliated with Conceptart.Org/Manley anymore.
I don't know the exact details of that.
Yep...and I am going to answer them. I will post a link in a sec, to the post I am about to make. Your work is of my favorite of any artist anywhere right now and even if it was just you asking, I would want to provide the answers. Even if you go away and think that JM is a POS I will still be a fan of what you do and will one day own one or two of those paintings of yours.
I reached out to Brad a few days ago to assist and provide information and he did not respond.
Mr. Rigney is mistaken again. I still own half the company. I just do not work there, I don't have operational control, or control of Finance, or view into TAD financial matters. CA.O and TAD are still under contract together. TAD is still atop this site, most of TAD's students still come from CA.O and TAD is still responsible to pay for CA.O's servers and site maintenance per those contracts, although I have been paying it myself for several months.
Sad thing is, from what little info I do have, I am certain that the one person that TAD owes the most royalties is me. How is that for irony? Just because one owns stock in a company or created a company, does not mean that they run it or control it or have the ability to pay people.
Last edited by Jason Manley; March 8th, 2013 at 01:04 AM.
I would like to believe you. I really would.
At this point I think a lot of us would like some hard evidence here. It seems as if you and TAD are saying different things and some proof would help clear the air.
Why is the thread being edited? There's already another thread with the followup...
DON'T CLICK THIS
Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall
no further damage to the school or the students is the best result I could have hoped for.
Don't bet on it. Good luck with the London thing LOL. If I was in the panel would also fight like a dog for scraps. But guess what? The whole industry witnessed how you tried to protect Jason unmanly or at least turn a blind eye to this. I hope people remember you for this. Good. luck because this will become a grave now
it really hurt my feelings. and from such a valued member of the community its... who are you again?
Anyway point is when will people learn i can dish it out but i cant take it? its not hard to remember. can dish it out, cant take it. simple.
Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 8th, 2013 at 03:57 AM.
sb most art copied to page 1
Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
facebook: Alface Killah
lol that's pretty funny I'm not going to lie. THAT .... is mob mentality. Grab some pitchforks and string someone up and anyone who doesn't agree with what's presented is going right up there as well.
So.....are we going to get some real proof here or what?
The story from TAD and from Manley are not matching up. What's going on?
P.S. I like how the name of the thread got changed. That seems a little......odd.
....and the editing begins
Did you see those unicorns? They were so pretty.
DON'T CLICK THIS
I will not have CA.O wrongly dragged through the mud any further. If someone wants to do so then I will take issue with that. This site helps people every day and without it a lot of good things would not be happening for people. I will not see it ruined over misinformation.
Last edited by Jason Manley; March 8th, 2013 at 02:01 AM.
So then it was TAD that withheld payment from all these artists intentionally?
I was going to make a new thread but figured it would just be easier to post here. CA.O and I were wrongly accused of stealing from artists this week, due to late payment by TAD Finance to some of the artists who created the videos. As I am under heavy scrutiny and integrity and reputation is important to me, I am going to work to provide the transparency that people seek, as promised. I would like to see all questions that were raised answered and to see this matter ended.
In order to provide transparency I have a proposal if this community wishes for it to be done. I am willing to ask for an audit and report to be created by Jeffrey Rose esq, whom is one of the top attorney's in the business and a speaker at the workshop, and whom some of you have seen volunteer and speak at the Greenlight Summit. This will not come cheap but I will pay to get it done. Jeff is a highly respected leader in entertainment and IP law and is familiar with this community and what this site is all about and knows art law inside and out. I am also willing to do a sworn affidavit under oath, with the penalty for perjury/falsehood being jail. I am willing to put my own neck on the line. So if you want answers, I can provide them in a way that is not harm others. There has been enough of that. As for the questions and full report, if the community is ok with this as a solution I will contact Mr. Rose tomorrow and send him all that I have. If the community has a lawyer of choice that it feels would be better to do so, do let me know as I want to get this done as quickly as possible.
I am very happy to hear that TAD's Chief Executive Officer finally took care of the issue he "alone" is responsible to handle, and I had made him aware of, as he is the top exec in the company and sole party in control of TAD Finance. As I said before, I notified TAD Finance about Brad's issue when Brad brought it to my attention and wish it would not have taken this long, nor did I know it had not been paid. I no longer work there and was not provided answers when I sent numerous formal inquiries when I did. TAD taking care of that is complete and total confirmation that this was not the debt of CA.O, nor did CA.O have anything to do with the payment matters, nor was CA.O as a company aware of any issues there. TAD took over all CA.O video contracts in 2010 when it contractually agreed to pay for the servers and maintenance here.
For those who think that anything I have said is untrue I have prepared all documents, emails, and content, completed my research and am willing to work an attorney to create a report. I will have a lot of work here to clear my name and will continue to do good work in this community. If the above solution is workable for you all, do let me know and I will begin tomorrow and hopefully have something early next week.
Last edited by Jason Manley; March 8th, 2013 at 02:00 AM.
First off I'd like to say fuck you to who ever threatend VK.
"Just because one owns stock in a company or created a company, does not mean that they run it or control it or have the ability to pay people. "
Why did you set it up that way then? It truly sounds like a clusterfuck. Why did you make it so hard for anybody including yourself to figure out where the money is?
So then TAD is responsible for this. Is that correct?
Also weren't you president of TAD during the las two years while Cryptcrawler was trying to get paid?
Doesn't that mean you had power to fix that situation?
I have to say, this doesn't add up. So Brad did email you, and you notified finance while you were still president of TAD. Why no follow up with them then? Doesn't the president control the purse strings? Why did it take two years and a public outcry for him to get his due?
Jason, in Brad's original journal he said that he had been emailing you personally trying to get the royalties and that you wouldn't send them to him. I just want to know if that part is true.
Last edited by Jason Manley; March 8th, 2013 at 02:19 AM.
No I did not control the purse strings. I did not have checks. I did not sign the checks. TAD Finance is managed by the CEO. At the time Brad notified me, I was technically still President but had not been on TAD's payroll for some time. I still took every appropriate effort to see that the appropriate parties paid him. My requests for information were also submitted to TAD's Board.
That's interesting info on TAD.
You didn't answer the question though.
Weren't you the president of TAD when this all happened? Yes or no.
Or is it all TAD's fault as the company stands now?
Even with a board of directors and some hurdles to jump, two years? Really? Was it not important enough to be taken care of promptly before it exploded on the Internet? I cannot imagine that a solution couldn't have been reached before this point without some deliberate inaction on someone, if not multiple people's parts.
Edit- I only just saw the response to my earlier post. So Is Brad mistaken when he said that he hadn't been paid in two years? Or did I misunderstand what he meant?
Why don't you just post the email?
If none of this is your fault and you have the paperwork to prove it why do you need a lawyers approval?
Because legal issues are sticky and sharing private documents isn't a simple as "here you go!" would be my guess.
JFierce is completely right. If I release content that is in private discussions then that is a problem for some. Going through a lawyer will allow the answers to be provided by someone whom is not me, whom can attest to the information and share it in a way that does not create liabilities regarding the release of documents.
Brad did not have two years before he got paid. Brad has earned tens of thousands of dollars from doing that video and had been paid all but a portion of it. I do not have the financial documents, nor did I get them, but I would think it was the last period his vid was on sale, when video sales were down to a trickle.