Big Tank

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 85

Thread: Big Tank

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Big Tank

    Ok hand on the block time, i never put my work in to crit which is kind of pussy as i crit lots of other peoples like im the big one and never even submit a wip so...this is for TAD IdD class thing, did all my work as fast as i could today so i could play with this all evening. its a big massive tank. ive got everyone doing a tank so we are trying to make ours the best. its to get everyone to learn about tanks and design and drawing in general. its still a wip and theres this is day 1 so theres like 3 or 4 weeks left so i need your help for ideas.
    I think it wouldnt be practical or tanks would look like this, it cant go down roads or on planes. but just make believe. but i tried to make it fairly practical having admitted that. like make it low and flat so it can hide, and shoot hull down etc.

    theres more views than these here in my link
    Big Tank
    http://conceptart.org/forums/showthr...41#post3662041

    some crits so far:

    crits so far, please add more
    -smaller bars and more mesh on RPG rail
    more stuff and detial on turret
    maybe a rail gun?
    maybe Phalanx style minigun close support weapon?
    bloody barrels are not aligned..



    i also thought it cant really look up easily, but maybe it can sort of squat on its tracks to tilt a bit. which should be easy to do. also might try a long narrow one articulated like a train.. so it can go down streets.

    anyway please tear it up or draw on it to help things. also composition and background, weak..
    also, the st joan thing, i dunno, it just reminded me of tianaman which was a good moment. fuck you The Man in your stupid tank!

    thanks in advance.

    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 7th, 2013 at 08:29 AM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  4. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    some real quick changes. it looks like the man is super strong and holding it up!
    its more like a self propelled gun..


    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    well, that was a fun evening! not often i get to kick back these days ;( time to crash.

    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,919
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked 824 Times in 677 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Looks pretty good to me!

    I'm not sure if this is supposed to be plausible from an engineering standpoint or not, but in terms of visual coolness I'd suggest you might want to push the functionality a bit more on the next iteration...if it's supposed to be a kind of mobile howitzer then there's really no need for that much armor, nor does the turret need to be enclosed. That might give you the opportunity to include forms that are less austere, which I think might look better. Unless you're going for really austere, in which case I'd suggest losing a lot of the "nurnies" and making it the tank equivalent of a Stealth bomber.

    This thing reminds me a LOT of the awesome tanks from the "Ogre" sci-fi board and miniature games of the late 1970s....sample image below. The designs for that game were more "theatrical" than "practical" or "realistic"-- but it seems to me your tank might benefit from a bit of that approach.

    Name:  tanks.jpg
Views: 5760
Size:  159.0 KB

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Giacomo For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    1,698
    Thanks
    3,152
    Thanked 663 Times in 491 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    One simple thing is that a projectile is most effective impacting normal to the surface. If there is no requirement of making the sides of the tank flat and vertical, I'd add a bit of slanted shapes. Also, the reactive armour plates seem a bit like an afterthought. They could be a bit better integrated into the design.

    Love the turret by the way

    気計 - Quike
    "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.."

    The Spaniard's Sketchbook... No holds barred
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Quike Garcia For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    697
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 176 Times in 174 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    This old Brazilian tank has a power trim system to make the wheels always have traction. I know that the Soviets thought a similar system in the 60 to produce a bomber that could use dirt runway for takeoff and landing, can not remember the model of the MIG, but it worked. In practice, they would like the legs of a spider or a scorpion, although a simple principle, which can also help. In the past, some off-road cars tried using the same system before artificial intelligence were available to make it electronically. In my opinion, if you put some wheels using this idea to your tank, you could achieve a better traction effect, because your mats fit the terrain.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EE-11_Urutu

    From the engineering point of view, it is suitable to produce this tank... the problem is, in the battle, could it be useful? Do not forget that the Soviets eliminated many tanks Tiger through ambushes that made its firepower useless. So, it was enough to invade the tower to eliminate the crew, which was a relatively simple task when the tank was alone. Moreover, many of them were lost in the mud during the winter due to the enormous weight of the armor.

    This is another example of what I am talking above

    http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/...-Tank-A40.html

    I think your tank is more suitable for the style of battles from the World War I. Nowadays, if your tank is not fast, or have a good camouflage system, it will not be used. My comments are just related to the usage aspects. About the painting, it is good.

    best regards

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to pauloricardo For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    thank you so much guys.

    paulo, this is one of the craziest things ive ever seen!!
    http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/aircraf...k-Inflight.jpg

    and i take your point about traction, and practicability; theres no way it would be any use cos it couldnt drive down anything smaller than a motorway, it was purely abiout visual impact.
    im thinking for the next version make it into a long articulated mobile howizter; less armour as Quike and Giacomo suggested, and instead two smaller lighter boxes, or possibly three, connected like a train. something a bit like this maybe shiould solve a lot of problems:
    this retains the redundancy of havlng lots of treads too so if one get blown up youve still got 3.

    [IMG]ill add more images with changes soon.[/IMG]
    Big Tank

    giacomo, those pics are perfect, ive not heard of that before but the idea of making them more tv game show esque is a good one i think.

    ill add more images with changes soon. thanks a lot fellas!

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    2,187
    Thanks
    4,148
    Thanked 2,207 Times in 882 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Hiya VK

    I know absolutely crap all about tanks but from a practical point of view the tall ufo jobby on the back looks like it would be seen by enemies quite clearly from a distance, what is that btw?

    p.s nice work!! The grainy pics are quite convincing

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Angel Intheuk For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    2,176
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 776 Times in 461 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Just remember that the multi-track thing only works if they're there to support a secondary chassis, or if the tracks on on independent pivots, which yours seem to be.

    Amateur Artist. Professional Asshole.

    Lookit the Pretty!

    Rule #1 of depicting soldiers: KEEP THE DAMN FINGER OFF THE DAMN TRIGGER.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Falchion For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 197 Times in 100 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    First off, fuck yes. Giant tank. There need to be more concepts of giant tanks with hot chicks firing machine guns
    indiscriminately into the air, but there are not, and that is a bad thing. It's a crisis, really.

    There's a series of questions I always ask before I design anything.

    1. What is it?
    2. What is it for?
    3. How does it do it?

    So far as I can tell, it's working out like this:

    1. Giant tank
    2. ???
    3. Bigass gun

    You've got a tank with a bigass gun, but as you have already stipulated, it's plausible functionality is severely
    hampered by the fact that it's the size of Gabriel Iglesias. Some might say that you can't really make the best
    tank a tank can be
    if your design doesn't have a obvious function. But I don't think that's necessarily the case.
    I think you've already, whether you're consciously aware of it or not, determined its function. You mentioned earlier
    that it's all about "visual impact", which is, as it turns out, still an important factor in warfare in general. Can't fit
    down an alleyway? Who gives a shit? It's got a rotating 270mm death cannon that can level a city block in 5
    seconds flat. It's a weapon of mass destruction, and there's no reason to radically redesign it. You can field the
    design premise ad-hoc like this:

    -Mobile command / fire-support / WMD
    -Deployed via ship via hovercraft and then utilizes existing road infrastructure to move inland (even if, practically, it's
    weight would destroy any road that wasn't 20' deep worth of concrete)
    -Deploys on the PERIMETER of urban centers, and provides direct fire-support with the intent to virtually level whole
    segments of a city. The idea here is that you unleash so much destructive power that it causes enemy combatants
    to flee from the cover of the urban sprawl. In this way, you induce fear in enemy insurgents such that you displace
    them as your own infantry assets push into the city. An enemy will not hold a position that they know can be utterly
    annihilated at any second.

    It basically takes the whole attritional aspect of urban warfare out of the equation by providing more immediate,
    prolonged, AND more destructive fire-support when compared to aerial bombardment. Boom. Sold. How much
    and how many?

    You also have a problem with proportion. What's true of almost every tank is that the height of the turret is shorter
    than the height of the chassis.

    Like, let's take a look at one of the most beautiful tanks ever designed:

    Name:  bailey-tiger-tank-final-22.jpg
Views: 20825
Size:  99.9 KB

    There's essentially a two to one ratio between the chassis and the turret.

    Let's look at the M1A Abrams, the tank yours is directly based on:

    Name:  M1.jpg
Views: 5933
Size:  211.1 KB

    You can see that ratio stays very nearly the same even in modern tanks. Why is that? Probably because that's
    where the crew needs to be.

    I've made a similar adjustment to yours, and honestly, I didn't actually scale the turret down so much as I increased
    the depth of the chassis:

    Name:  Tank_Proportion.jpg
Views: 5333
Size:  232.9 KB

    At present, your tank looks incredibly top heavy, which is counter-intuitive. You want a larger, heavier chassis in
    order to help absorb recoil from the main cannon, and to provide 'comfortable' clearance for the crew (not that
    there's any wanting for space in the interior...)

    When it comes to complex mechanical designs, and based on my own architectural training, I tend to think in terms
    of section. When you know where the internal mechanisms of the tank are, and how all of the various compartments
    are supposed to work together, then you will have a much clearer image of how the tank should appear on the exterior.
    What kind of compartments should there be in this tank? How large is the crew? Do they need sleeping quarters? If
    there's a command center, where's the command center? What kind of propulsion system does it have? Nuclear power,
    maybe? How do you load three barrel rotating 270mm cannon? I Literally play a game of 20 questions with my designs for
    10 minutes, and then write down some quick, semi-plausible answers. You don't have to actually work out the internals
    visually, but you could...

    Name:  DayDreamNote_021.jpg
Views: 5716
Size:  360.9 KB

    Fucking Hayao Miyazaki. His sketchbooks are just filled with this kind of shit, and if that doesn't give you some kind of
    design boner, then I can't help you.

    In any case, when I field these kinds of technical questions early in the design process, and do some preliminary
    conceptualization (even if they're just notes and not initial design sketches), I wind up eliminating a lot of headaches
    later on down the road. Because if I know how large the crew needs to be, then I know there has to be a certain amount
    of internal space for them all. And if I know roughly the quantity of internal space required, then you I how to
    handle habitable volumes relative to volumes reserved for mechanical systems. If the tank is powered by a nuclear reactor,
    then I don't have to sweat about operational limitations so much, ect. Doing this kind of legwork early on ensures that I
    have a much clearer design objective, and that I don't get distracted or confused later on. Of course, I'm also one to
    obsess over details, and to an entirely unhealthy degree (which is why it takes me 30+ hours to finish any painting ever).

    Anywho, you're off to a fantastic start. When I saw that first image posted in your sketchbook thread, I knew this shit was
    gonna be hot. Can't wait to see it progress.

    Last edited by The Fez; March 8th, 2013 at 07:53 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to The Fez For This Useful Post:


  19. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    THIS is CA. Not thids managerial-level shenanigans. THIS.

    OK
    Angel.Yeah the mushroom, my idea was that it was some kind of scanner on an extendible pole so it could see over things, like the thing on top of an Apache Longbow. This allows it to hide behind things like hills and walls and scan the area. A periscope, effectively. But it needs lots more designing!
    Hers the one I was thinking of..
    Thank you so much you guys by the way.
    Big Tank

    Now, Fezmaster, heres the score, I got class on tuesday so ive got monday pencilled in to go nuts on this badboy. Your fantastic crits will go a long way, Ill update you so you can see the difference it made. And sorry, but Im lifting whole paragraphs to pass on to the team.
    BTW, assuming it all survives the current unpleasantness, join TAD, youd love it and Id fucken love your brain in ID class!

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  21. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    2,176
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 776 Times in 461 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    VK, I'd recommend looking up the old RAND Corporation study on the future of armor. There's at least five different tank/IFV configurations theorized in there with associated hardware that I've found useful and if put into practice, very visually distinctive.

    Amateur Artist. Professional Asshole.

    Lookit the Pretty!

    Rule #1 of depicting soldiers: KEEP THE DAMN FINGER OFF THE DAMN TRIGGER.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Falchion For This Useful Post:


  23. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Filthy I forgot to thank you earlier, and Im reading the RAND report now so I can deliver the guts of it to the students. We talk a lot about who uses the things we;re designing, what world they inhabit, and all the design issues facing the product, much as Fez analysed above. This is a really interesting addition to that knowledge. Also Quike, youre right about the sides being too flat. I was thinking maybe break them up into wierd surfaces like in an anechoic chamber, might look kind of cool and techy.

    Big Tank

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 9th, 2013 at 06:51 AM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  25. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Near Philly, US
    Posts
    360
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked 270 Times in 137 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mega tank—pretty cool!
    It dwarfs some of those non-line-of-sight cannons.

    I thought the tank was too long and narrow to do any practical skid steering (without a battle ship sized turning radius), but compared to the track to ground patch (dark gray area in diagram) and spacing of an M1 Abrams, it’s not much longer (at the same outside width). It seems the tracks are pretty close together, in line—that’s without seeing the tracks on your model behind the skirt.

    I agree The Fez that the chassis just looks to flat, compared with the turret.

    Those Apaches are impressive (pic)—although too much pilot hotdogging can render all the tech useless:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDOCh6QWQm8

    More updates!

    Name:  3view.jpg
Views: 5196
Size:  283.2 KB

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to bill618 For This Useful Post:


  27. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    697
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 176 Times in 174 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Velocity Kendall View Post

    it was purely abiout visual impact.
    Hello Velocity, no doubt you got a good result on it...

    best regards

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  28. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    bit of apathetic update guys, im really busy trying to catch up on stuff fomr the last few days. but ill spend some more serious time on monday when stuffs cleared out the way.
    i ensmallened the gun and stuff. needs some though, based on your ideas.

    Name:  frotny2222.jpg
Views: 5010
Size:  59.8 KB
    Name:  bt2222s.jpg
Views: 5057
Size:  62.9 KB
    Name:  bt2222as.jpg
Views: 4995
Size:  188.0 KB

    Name:  bebeb11as.jpg
Views: 5003
Size:  83.3 KB
    Name:  bebeb11s.jpg
Views: 4983
Size:  239.8 KB

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 10th, 2013 at 04:25 AM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  30. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,919
    Thanks
    54
    Thanked 824 Times in 677 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    What exactly is the purpose of that railing around the turret? Also, why are there side views of burnt-out cars texture-mapped on the side of it?

    I'm not sure the most recent iteration is a huge improvement...if it were me at this point, I'd quit out of my 3D program, print out the orthographic views of the thing, trace over them to refine the form, and scan those in as backdrops to work from. The last round of changes feels a bit like you're moving forms around at random in hopes that some magic will happen.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  31. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Giacomo View Post
    What exactly is the purpose of that railing around the turret? Also, why are there side views of burnt-out cars texture-mapped on the side of it?

    I'm not sure the most recent iteration is a huge improvement...if it were me at this point, I'd quit out of my 3D program, print out the orthographic views of the thing, trace over them to refine the form, and scan those in as backdrops to work from. The last round of changes feels a bit like you're moving forms around at random in hopes that some magic will happen.
    Youre not wrong G, 45 mins at the end of the day and just noodling, not really designing.
    I havent made any other changes apart from shrinking the turret really. The only other things I moved were I made the roller wheels smaller and more numerous, in the hope of making the overall track look larger, and telescoped down and folded over the over-the-horizon periscope RADAR.

    oh i also moved the claw on the back a bit. this is used for ploughing up roads and landing strips,. as well as towing.
    ]
    oh and i dropped the airboxes at the back a bit, they were fouling the gun as it went round.

    but really it needs 6 hours.

    The railing is partly Slat Armour use to explode RPG rounds before they hit the turret, to prevent the ammo magazine exploding, and also for soldiers to hang off and dump their packs in when using the tank as a transporter.
    Big Tank

    i need to make some slat armour panels i think.
    Ammo is stacked radially around the inside of the turret usually, and if it explodes the tank is dead. So a lot of effort has to be made to prevent this.
    Big Tank
    The burnt out cars were a reacl quick attempt to show the tank trying to blend with whats around it, can see its not reading well.. hmm.

    right, lots to think about, update monday night. thanks all, no where else can i get the straight dope. love you guys.

    Big Tank

    im using my cross sections book to mak out internals. im thinking 4 lambo engines and a big vacuum magnetically suspnded flywheel and some lithium batteries, all driving 1 track per engine...
    im using this book to helop map the internals while working on paid work (tanks are so much more fun)

    Big Tank

    Giacomo, please keep the thoughts coming, what you mentioned already has given me a lot tp think about re adaptive camo.

    heres more of my research..

    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank



    i love the gun on this one by young Jepray over on. i just noticed the little three barrel rotary canon in there too!
    man this takes me back...

    Big Tank

    OK monday night, time for a major upgrade to MK2!!!

    Lets be honest, three rotary 150mm barrels is cool, but a rail gun or a laser and ginormous batteries, thats where its at right??

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 10th, 2013 at 01:35 PM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  33. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,367
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 358 Times in 278 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Okay, my head hurts. I have no comments to add, just offering my support and I hope you keep working on this and posting because I'm learning lots of interesting stuff in this thread.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Candra H For This Useful Post:


  35. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 197 Times in 100 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I liked the car silhouette camouflage. It's clever, and I think it ties the tank directly into a setting. Would it actually work?
    That's another one of those things that can be left ambiguous, because, ultimately, we're designing for fictional realms,
    and it can work in our fictional realms if we so decide. I like the narrative of an enemy tank commander scanning the
    horizon through his binoculars, panning carelessly by it, and then having to do a double take only to realize that he's be zeroed
    in, and has exactly two more seconds to live.

    Designing via 3D modeling software is hard as hell. I am routinely in awe of anyone who can do it intuitively, because there
    is a significant tendency to get bogged down with details and the general management of the modeling tools in general (at
    least for me). I might second Giacomo's suggestion to break away from the model for a bit, and work out some sketches (which,
    maybe you have).

    One of the things I've always liked about superscale vehicles (battleships, submarines, ect, ect, ect) is that they tend to each
    posses a human ecology all there own. I've always liked reading about daily lives of tank-crews, for instance. You find that
    these vehicles become social mechanisms as well as actual mechanisms for warfare. They're like moving cities, and I
    think the genius of creators like Miyazaki is to capture the essence of this intimate social dynamic in films like Laputa: Castle
    in the Sky. I'm referring here directly to the sky pirates in that film. Their existence is bound to some crazy flying contraption,
    and that's fascinating in and of itself. One of the challenges of being a designer AND storyteller is to capture the day-to-day
    routine non-verbally in our designs. What really ties a design to "REALITY" proper is not how convincing your mechanisms are
    (Some of Miyazaki's designs are straight up ridiculous in terms of mechanical feasibility), or how elaborate your operational
    functions, but the quality of your design empathy regarding the characters who use it. I think this consideration is probably the
    most important aspect of design, and is frequently the aspect least considered. For instance, I never particularly liked any Gundam
    anime (except for the original) until 8th MS team, and that's because 8th MS Team began to talk about Gundams in exactly the
    language I'm describing. When you consider Gundams merely as super-powered robots (like Gundam Wing, which was rubbish),
    and as mere destructive objects, they're just boring. Break them down, talk about having to live out of that shit, talk about the
    legion of mechanics and engineers who would have to maintain it, talk about how real people would have to use it. Develop
    an ecology of individuals who have to make a machine work
    , and then you'll have a design that possesses something more
    important than mere function: it will have character. And if you can give a machine personality and character, then you've
    transcended mere mechanical design.

    Thinking about this dynamic will also prevent you from falling into another pitfall. I think there's a higher tendency among
    designers these days to focus on whether or not their designs are "tacticool". I hate to pick on this guy, but I've seen his
    work a few places, and it's the perfect example of what I'm talking about:

    Name:  643_large.jpg
Views: 4974
Size:  104.5 KB

    Here, the focus really becomes about how much tactical bullshit can be piled up on to a thing. This stuff is trending, too,
    and I feel nothing for it.

    Don't do that. Always think about the human element. Because, here's what's up, your design will not exist in a abstract
    vacuum. It's going to be placed in a setting, whether it be a movie, a video game, or a comic-book, and either it's a vehicle
    for the drama of that setting, or it's just a vehicle.

    I've rambled quite a bit here, but there's just some stuff I've got to get out of my brain case these days, and this seemed
    like the right thread for it. We're all designers here, and I don't see why we can't have discussions about the issues.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to The Fez For This Useful Post:


  37. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Fez, we have a LOT to talk about. Your rambling is gold. Details in my sig. This is what our classes our like, everyone just chimes in.

    That pic you linked is a bad copy of the I think excellent Aaron Becks highly influential work.

    Re Miyazake, that robot... ancient, but still functional and powered and with fully sentient AI, that speaks of a Kardashev 1.5 society of immense power that has fall a long time ago but seriously built to last. All of this is encoded. Its also a sweet aqnd magical character. Its increidble data compression.
    Like I say, we have a lot to discuss. please sign up for TAD??? youd rock out!

    Heres some of my rubbish slides, might be of interest. i cant spell...

    Name:  03 SLIDE deckerds stuff.jpg
Views: 4846
Size:  156.1 KB
    Name:  03 slide INDUSTRY STRCUTURE.jpg
Views: 4772
Size:  69.9 KB
    Name:  04 SLIDE LESSON STRCUTURE.jpg
Views: 4775
Size:  119.8 KB
    Name:  05 slide how to submit work.jpg
Views: 4764
Size:  64.6 KB
    Name:  06 SLIDE DES SPIRAL.jpg
Views: 4714
Size:  72.5 KB
    Name:  07 SLIDE DESIGN VS PRES.jpg
Views: 4731
Size:  84.1 KB
    Name:  08 SLIDE TOPIC SURVEY.jpg
Views: 4691
Size:  75.9 KB
    Name:  11 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 3.jpg
Views: 4844
Size:  80.9 KBName:  design spiral.jpg
Views: 4655
Size:  130.8 KBName:  File nam 2.jpg
Views: 4635
Size:  73.0 KBName:  File nam 3.jpg
Views: 4643
Size:  76.3 KBName:  File nam 4.jpg
Views: 4632
Size:  141.1 KBName:  File nam 5.jpg
Views: 4616
Size:  126.7 KBName:  File nam 6.jpg
Views: 4609
Size:  102.5 KBName:  File nam 7.jpg
Views: 4594
Size:  84.2 KBName:  planny.jpg
Views: 4584
Size:  69.8 KBName:  stages.jpg
Views: 4567
Size:  105.8 KB
    Name:  12 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 6.jpg
Views: 4594
Size:  82.2 KB
    Name:  13 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 4.jpg
Views: 4585
Size:  94.7 KB
    Name:  14 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 1.jpg
Views: 4540
Size:  86.1 KB
    Name:  15 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 5.jpg
Views: 4505
Size:  58.8 KB
    Name:  16 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 8.jpg
Views: 4541
Size:  74.2 KB
    Name:  17 SLIDE ANATOMY OF A GUN 7.jpg
Views: 4529
Size:  81.5 KB
    Name:  077 SLIDE progress.jpg
Views: 4510
Size:  112.5 KB
    Name:  111 slide gun ergo 1.jpg
Views: 4487
Size:  55.9 KB
    Name:  0777 slide machine feelings.jpg
Views: 4475
Size:  75.3 KB

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 10th, 2013 at 03:08 PM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  39. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    278
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 197 Times in 100 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I'm honestly looking to transition out of architecture (read: interior design ) and into concept art, which is scary as hell, because I know full well what my competition is like. You just can't be good. You have to be mindblowingly good. Of course, I'm sure the greats never obtained their level of ability by cowering the shadows of their superiors. I would love to get involved with TAD, and, in actuality would just love to go back to school full-time and develop my technical proficiency and imaginative capability. Currently, I really have no idea how I could manage that at this juncture in my life. Really, I just need to take the plunge, and start working freelance as a concept artist, for better or worse, because picking out grout color just isn't cutting it

    Last edited by The Fez; March 10th, 2013 at 04:31 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  40. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I worked in at the buildings dept in the local council during my degree, surveying their property portfolio and drawing up the plans, and integrating their disparate stashes of plans.. All i cared about when I was 21 was having a black Alfa 164 with a bong in it, my own poky office and a job where people didnt fucking bug me. It was alright. Boring people but easy to handle. And a monthly cheque is all good. So I'm not knocking that life.
    After uni I worked in a studio that fabricated concept cars. It was ok but I found i was only warming up for work at 5pm! So eventually I left and did really boring design work freelance, was broke for ages and slowly got more interestnig work. The process continues but 3 years in Id recommend it.
    Guys like Randis are the inspiration, theyve got their shit in order. they live the life, make decent bank, make cool work, and are their own people.
    I advise getting in some work before you quit. Making some steady contacts, even if its boring shit. I do loads of property development visuals (read interior design) when things get slow, boring paid work is better than nothing. I quite like designing houses if Im honest.
    Finally, the attitude I find helps is that espoused by the young Snoop Dogg and Ice Cube. Life is hard, youve gotta hustle every day, work hard on your shit, getting by and not relying on any fucker is where its at. As is gin and juice. If you made it through the day, made some art, made some dough for rent and didnt use you AK, it was a good day. Onward and upward.
    Thats all I can tell you.

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  41. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Velocity Kendall For This Useful Post:


  42. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    1,698
    Thanks
    3,152
    Thanked 663 Times in 491 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    The Fez last point is gold.

    I'd add a couple of pointers.

    One thing you should take into account on the design is the kind of conflict the weapon system is aimed for. A huge tank like that is obviously appointed to quite symmetric conflicts (trying to make them assymetric by sheer size alone ) which can make it vulnerable to small attacks (death star style) This can be avoided with a bit of thoughts in the design, like a v-shaped hull to minimize mine/IED damage, small ports around to allow small arms fire, a 360º optics system for situational awareness and protected observation spots for the crew. Also NBC shielding wouldn't be a bad idea.

    Second, regarding the tacticool effect, there has been traditionally two approaches to body armour and carry-on equipment. The heavier armour approach, looking for full body armour, with lots of equipment, and the lighter one, covering just the essentials and relying more on moving constantly. If you're going to be a sitting duck, like a sentinel, it makes sense to have a heavier protection, but for an infiltration/assault operative, it may become cumbersome quite fast, and many of them will get rid of the unnecesary equipment along the way. I knew spanish special forces guys that loved to make joint excercises with other forces because they'd come back home with lots of brand new equipment left in the field by other armies..

    Also, for RPG protection technology http://www.qinetiq-na.com/products/survivability/q-net/

    気計 - Quike
    "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.."

    The Spaniard's Sketchbook... No holds barred
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  43. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Name:  Tanky mk2Jm.jpg
Views: 4321
Size:  261.6 KBName:  bt2222asFF.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  234.7 KBName:  bebeb11asFF.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  289.5 KBsome new brain thinkings based on what weve talked about..
    moved it towards a long range weapon with less small arms defensive capability. maybe something like a giant sniper rifle for shooting down satellites or something!

    all the images got messed up in the server move..
    so heres the lot..

    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank


    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 13th, 2013 at 11:20 PM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  44. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    2,176
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 776 Times in 461 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Digging the articulation, but those things need a LOT more ground clearance. They're supertanks, they're not supposed to be stopped by little things like improvised barricades or conventional planters!

    Amateur Artist. Professional Asshole.

    Lookit the Pretty!

    Rule #1 of depicting soldiers: KEEP THE DAMN FINGER OFF THE DAMN TRIGGER.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  45. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    v good point. and it needs to be able to stop an A10 tankbuster
    heres some tank traps, in warhammer form
    Big Tank
    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  46. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I think if it can pivot each track independently i can get it to tippy toe over at elast some tank barriers. just need to get all my work out the way and ill do it..
    more playing between boring work
    Name:  back888bc.jpg
Views: 4136
Size:  379.7 KBName:  Joan mk2hhhb.jpg
Views: 4101
Size:  492.3 KB

    Last edited by Velocity Kendall; March 14th, 2013 at 02:45 AM.
    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  47. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    1,698
    Thanks
    3,152
    Thanked 663 Times in 491 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    I like the inclusion of the CIWS turrets (although the base seems a bit flimsy articulated only on one side), and I guess at the top is a Surface to Air missile turret. That should stop a warthog for sure By the way, you have a CIWS turret that fires the A10 gun, the Goalkeeper.

    気計 - Quike
    "Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the present.."

    The Spaniard's Sketchbook... No holds barred
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  48. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridge UK
    Posts
    5,460
    Thanks
    6,454
    Thanked 4,521 Times in 2,457 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Yep the mini phalaxes need better armatures, its on a big shelf bracket from the turret but its not the best and neither is the arm it pivots on. still basic. when everyhtings placed ill add the belt feeders and wires and smaller detail everywhere too
    Name:  fronttt.jpg
Views: 4108
Size:  151.1 KBName:  tur11ff.jpg
Views: 4100
Size:  317.2 KB


    I have an A10 bullet on my desk from class, its nearly 7 inches long. Its like Shiva the Destroyer's dildo.


    Big Tank
    Big Tank

    sb most art copied to page 1
    Weapons of Mass Creation 2011 ::: Add your favourites!
    skype: velocitykendall
    facebook: Alface Killah
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 24

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook