Results 1 to 13 of 27
March 2nd, 2013 #1
[Art Education] Thoughts on Less Experienced Instructors
I'm not sure if this topic something commonly discussed, I certainly have never seen it in all the time I've been here.
I was wondering what everyone's opinions (especially those who are/were teachers) are on artists teaching/providing tuition who are younger and lack the experience of older age and more years in professional practise.
Assuming that they're genuinely hard working and not some hack job who's out to make a quick buck off students who don't know better, because the latter doesn't really need discussing.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 2nd, 2013 #2
March 2nd, 2013 #3
This kind of question leads to all kinds of sticky questions and answers. First of all how much experience is not enough? What level of student will the teacher be teaching? There are plenty of young teachers with less experience but more energy and translatable passion for the work and especially for teaching. This is one of those questions that really has a lot of variables and is hard to answer in general.
March 2nd, 2013 #4
March 2nd, 2013 #5
I can't complain, since I used to be one of them.
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
March 3rd, 2013 #6
Just my two cents.
Is this kind of like “fake it til you make it" scenarios? Because that can turn ugly really fast if you can't deliver what you promise. That wouldn't be fair to others.
Last edited by Pigeonkill; March 3rd, 2013 at 01:07 AM.Make a sketchbook happy, feed it a tip to improve!
March 3rd, 2013 #7
March 3rd, 2013 #8
Thanks for your responses.
You're right that the variables are endless, hmmm...
Elwell: Please do share more of your wisdom.
I'm simply talking about someone with less experience but still hard working, so I guess it does imply that some instances of 'faking' maybe unavoidable due to less experience.
A 21 year old guy who's been spending all their time honing their drawing skills isn't likely to have the life experience or industry experience necessary to teach, no matter how good they may be.
March 3rd, 2013 #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Ottawa, Canada
- Thanked 1,439 Times in 748 Posts
Pretty sure Rembrandt was had his own studio he taught at at like 22 or something, same with Van Dyck at like 19 or something. Might not be exactly right in terms of numbers, but there is a history of skilled young artists who would teach. And for a more contemporary example, Jeff Watts started teaching at around 20/21 I believe (don't think it was called Watts Atelier at that point, but was more of a precursor to it).
"Complacency is the womb of mediocrity. " -- Jason Manley
"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." -- Bruce Lee
March 3rd, 2013 #10
I don't think you can make a blanket judgment. It depends on too many things. In particular, WHAT is the teacher teaching? How much do they know about the subject they're teaching? And how good are they at communicating it?
If someone is teaching, say, color theory or life drawing, they don't need "industry experience", they just need to know enough about color theory or life drawing to be able to impart useful information on those subjects, and they need the communication skills to do so. And that's it, really. Doesn't matter if they're 20 or 80. I've had young teachers who were good at what they taught, and old ones who weren't, and all sorts in between.
March 3rd, 2013 #11
Usually the teacher pulls in people who have less ability as students so it doesn't really matter the teachers ability as long as what they teach isn't flat out wrong. A good teacher with limited skills will teach all they know. The student moves on once they get all they can from that teacher.
Last edited by dpaint; March 3rd, 2013 at 09:31 AM.
March 3rd, 2013 #12Jester
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Toronto, Ontario
- Thanked 541 Times in 387 Posts
Teaching is a skill, which takes some time to develop through theory and practice. In general, it takes about 10 years to be good at teaching, animation, illustration, concept art, programming <insert your favourite skill here>. Being a skilled artist doesn't necessarily mean you're a skilled teacher. I usually take it with a grain of salt if a school promotes itself by stressing that all teachers are experienced artists: they might as well be crappy teachers.
On top of that, the people I have met over the past 30 years that are both skilled professionals at art, mathematics, or computer science, and teaching, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. As a result, most skilled professionals are pretty bad teachers. The exceptions to the rule are true diamonds...
Grinnikend door het leven...
The Following User Says Thank You to eezacque For This Useful Post:
March 3rd, 2013 #13
I agree with QueenGwenewre.
HunterKiller. If you feel like you are less experienced than others, but people are still interested in what you do know. You are still in the green and not putting anybody on. The more experience and services you can provide, the higher price you can reasonable command.
Make a sketchbook happy, feed it a tip to improve!
The Following User Says Thank You to Pigeonkill For This Useful Post: