Results 27 to 39 of 41
Thread: Giving good criticism
December 8th, 2012 #27Registered User
I don't think the introduction of TAD actually had that much effect, certainly not as much as some behind the scenes politics...
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Thanked 5,197 Times in 1,728 Posts
At least Icarus tried!
My Process: Dead Rider Graphic Novel (Dark Horse Comics) plus oil paintings, pencils and other goodies:
My "Smilechild" Music. Plus a medley of Commercial Music Cues and a Folksy Jingle!:
Hide this ad by registering as a memberDecember 8th, 2012 #28
I'll be honest. I critique many hours a day 4 days a week in class and it's hard to get in the critique mode when I get on the computer. I only have spurts here and there in cyberspace and I look to promote and find some kind of professional comradery. Donating time with critique has almost become like donating time illustrating for me. To do it thoroughly really takes time and thoughtful consideration. Maybe that's why there is a lot of just get busy and draw and fewer crits from busy pros. Time really is money and I guess I applaud those who are willing to give it away so freely. But think of what you are asking when you ask for a detailed critique of your work. Is it the same as asking for a free illustration for you band's cd cover or a free painting for your wall?
December 8th, 2012 #29
December 8th, 2012 #30
I've tried to give critiques as much as possible but it does take up a lot of my time to be doing so. I even try to do paint-overs if I think it can help but most of the time it falls on deaf ears; there are a few exceptions. The ones that I see make an attempt to correct their work gives me an incentive to comment again the next time they post. A lot of the time someone will come on after and say how perfect the image is at that point I just go away. I find I probably can reach more people defending a point of view on how to study or become a pro in the art discussions than doing individual critiques.
December 8th, 2012 #31
The best critiques come from someone who's not only knowledgeable in the craft, but who understands you and your intents.
Any other critique is only superficial.
This is why internet forums will never trump an actual teacher.
December 8th, 2012 #32
A good teacher, maybe. I had a lot of bad teachers. I'd have given a lot for a forum like this when I was a kid.
I was once on the receiving end of a critique so savagely nasty, I marched straight out of class to the office and changed my major (sketchbook).
The Following User Says Thank You to Stoat For This Useful Post:
December 8th, 2012 #33
December 8th, 2012 #34
saying that any other critique is superficial seems to be quite exaggerated to me.
first its on the artist to arcticulate his intent. then it can be evaluated, if this works on a personal level, and where the shortcomings are when it comes to design.
Last edited by sone_one; December 8th, 2012 at 10:51 PM.
December 8th, 2012 #35
Depends. One thing a teacher is good for is giving you feedback while you work. Having someone look over your shoulder and point out bad habits as you perpetrate them is probably the fastest way to discover and combat those habits. You really can't get that in a virtual setting.
Also a teacher can give you specific assignments - with specific goals in mind - and can gauge what you've understood by seeing how you do on the assignments, and adjust their instruction accordingly. That's something you could do virtually, but you'd need a one-on-one mentor relationship to get the most out of it.
Of course, all of this assumes the teacher is a good one. Forums don't trump a good teacher, but I'll agree they trump a bad one any day.
December 9th, 2012 #36
Truly spoken replies.
I was going under the assumption that the teacher would be a good one, but of course these are rare and often expensive.
I did not mean to undermine the value of communities such as these, I myself owe much my learning to this place and the internet.
most people don't have a grasp on basics and at those levels understanding intent and the artist is unnecessary.
December 9th, 2012 #37
Forums are great for those who can spend time and learn. I guess my point was if we value our knowledge as artists so much that we yell at those who give their illustration skills or artwork away for free why are we so non-chalant about giving and taking valuable critiquing knowledge gained over years of study and practice?
December 9th, 2012 #38
I agree it is valuable information and hard earned experience over years of study and practice Bill. Like I said earlier, for me it is a relatively easy way to share my experience which I am glad to do in most cases. But I find most of the critique and advice boils down to those fundamentals (obviously since that is mainly what I say), so that is an easy comment and book recommendation. The reality is, imho, the answers are not to be found here on CA, or any forum for that matter. We can recommend books and resources however that will take the student much farther...if they are motivated enough.
In those special cases where someone is farther along, and working hard at it I sometimes offer more specific critique - but that is rare. Plus those cases are often already sorted out or plenty of people have offered valid critique before I see the post. Then there are the people that don't bother hitting thanks, saying thanks or responding in any way...and I don't waste time on them again.
December 9th, 2012 #39
I have not really taken a hard line either way Jeff. I just find it interesting what we put a $ value on and what we don't. If a whole bunch of people started asking for 5 minute, average time to answer crit questions maybe, sketches for free would we gladly give them? Is it the act? Making a 5 minute sketch is no harder than typing for five minutes in my case. I think this could actually make an interesting discussion.