Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: A little help with life drawing
August 7th, 2012 #1
A little help with life drawing
I having trouble working with all the information I have some of it contradicting that its almost like I am making it harder on myself when going to life drawing.
Sketchbook here: http://conceptart.org/forums/showthr...=234403&page=7 you can see I am struggling.
The main example being "Draw what you see, not what you know/think you see" vs Villpus "Never copy the model."
It seems like I should be honing my observational skills and trying to be as accurate as I can with shapes and angles and proportions before delving into methods that deal more with abstraction like Vilppu or Hampton or even the Loomis Mannequin. I mean still doing studies at from them at home to start implanting the information but not worry about implementing these methods with the model yet until I can at least draw what I see.
Is this right or should I just keep doing what I am doing, trying to implement Vilppu's methods? I cant tell whether I am jumping ahead of myself.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberAugust 7th, 2012 #2
I'm at the same place... But after much thought I'm going with Vilppu's method, it seems like it will work out better in the long run.
Being able to see everything as a 3d shape and understand the space those shapes take up seems a lot more valuable to me then training my brain to flatten objects and copy them the way a camera does.
"The whole point of practice is to do it until you can do it right." - dpaint
The Following User Says Thank You to element1988 For This Useful Post:
August 7th, 2012 #3
I understand your feelings, I am somewhat struggling with hitting the same proportions as the reference myself.
I am finding however, that the stronger I get at drawing through invention the closer my studies get to looking like duplicates of my reference. but that's just me. I hear people learn differently.
If you feel like isolating your studies to purely trying to perfect shape copying then try it for a while and see how it helps your constructive studies.
The Following User Says Thank You to Saurabhinator For This Useful Post:
August 7th, 2012 #4
Thanks for the input element1988 and Saurabhinator
August 7th, 2012 #5
That's a false dichotomy. Being able to accurately reproduce what you see and being able to distill an abstracted form are not opposite skills; they are two sides of the same skill that reinforce each other.
So practice both at the same time. Draw the model as if you were abstracting its form, while making the abstraction follow what you are seeing.
August 7th, 2012 #6
Its more wondering whether I should be advised to "Just practice drawing what you see the best you can for a while BEFORE delving into the world of using abstractions and drawing through invention." The answers I am getting from everyone though is "No, keep pushing!"
Thats not to say your advice though isn't still valid and helpful though, I'm just nit picking
August 7th, 2012 #7Jester
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Toronto, Ontario
- Thanked 462 Times in 327 Posts
August 7th, 2012 #8
I have never found learning to draw a step my step system. We learn in different ways and we produce art in different ways. By doing what others have suggested here and trying some of both and some of other things you'll find a direction for yourself for awhile and then find another.
I guess I'm getting tired of all those places where everyone learns the same step my step methods and it shows in their work.
August 7th, 2012 #9
August 7th, 2012 #10
August 8th, 2012 #11
I think the second concept is a warning against slavishly focusing on minute detail to the point of being overwhelmed and bogging down.
Observational drawing, taken to ridiculous extremes, leads to the slow, tedious brute force measuring techniques of the contemporary atelier schools, e.g. Aristides.
Figure invention, taken to, um, stranger extremes, gives the work of Burne Hogarth.
Robert Beverly Hale talks at great length about learning to visualize/depict the figure as volumetric solids and learning to build "real" looking anatomy upon these forms.
I'd say Hale has many of the answers you're looking for!
August 8th, 2012 #12
Thanks Kamber I will check him out
August 8th, 2012 #13
Another thing you can look at my girlfriend taught me is by using a grid system. At first I didn't find it very beneficial but looking at a model through a grid, and having a light grid on the page gets you used to seeing the shapes of a figure rather than the figure themselves, looking at individual squares.
Of course it works better when your reference is an image but I believe its used by a variety of artists. I doubt I have been much help but its a suggestion, even if you just have an image, draw the grid and look at the shapes in each grid it should help train your eye.
Best of luck!
August 8th, 2012 #14
A lot of the techniques that developed such as shape abstraction, constructive anatomy, etc... are meant to simplify and provide efficiency towards the process of translating form.
They also help you to understand what you're drawing/painting in a 3D sense, as opposed to literally copying hue/value/chroma without thinking about why.
When observing life, there's so much information to work with that you cannot possible take in everything. It's always necessary to do a certain amount of editing/simplifying, and a lot of these methods help in that process.
When working from a model it seems best to balance the methods you know of constructing form with the visual information that you're taking in.
When working from imagination, you really have nothing to rely on but what you know, it's all about three-dimensional construction.
August 8th, 2012 #15
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."