Join 500,000+ Artists
Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!
Look at this poor attempt at a new social network for graphic designers & illustrators XD
so you finally have your idea up and running huh ?
i admire your passion, i thought you would be pretty down after this, but appearently not so.
can you give us a demo on what feature your site have ? Or will have ?
i think that you can learn a few thing or two from the other thread that comparing artwork wont help very much
As far as what it will have, that's up to feedback of users
"If passion drives you, let reason hold the reins."
Last edited by B.K. Conn; August 4th, 2012 at 07:04 AM.
you might want to rethink your marketing strategy...Look at this poor attempt at a new social network for graphic designers & illustrators XD
still this just comes second to rethinking your product. a ton of people actually beeing your target group, told you it would be a flawed concept.
to me, and ill be honest there, still doing it that way, ignoring constructive and justified critique, is no sign of passion, but of stubbornness.
anyway good luck with your effort...
Last edited by sone_one; August 5th, 2012 at 05:44 PM.
Our hypothesis is that designers would like to spread their art and also have their friends and customers 'rate' their artwork so they can know which design works and which ones don't in the marketplace. All while still maintaining a fun place to come browse, rate & hang.
Other than that we want to know exactly how all artists feel how this should be executed and we will build it
Sorry if I & my team appear stubborn, but In the world I believe a certain bit of, "get it done" then make it better as we go, goes along way.
Your avatar pic is awesome! Lol, we would love to have your art displayed on Digicrits. ;P
Last edited by B.K. Conn; August 5th, 2012 at 10:49 PM.
I clicked the link, saw I had to register, immediately clicked "back".
If I can't browse the site to see what's up first, I will not participate.
That's just a general principle of mine, not saying I would participate anyway.
But if it was a neat site, that would be a surefire way to make me not interested. I'd definitely consider changing that aspect.
Design wise. I have no intent on registering for a site that looks like I have to register to see a wordpress blog.
Be bold and register? lol.
Originally Posted by Poster
We will build in log in with Facebook / twitter very soon
Purpose of the app is to get instant crits from the community and the higher the rating, the higher you are on the "artist looking for work" list section which will be soon to be built in. For people looking to commission some work. Better to get in early and earn higher rankings for when the site goes commercial with job postings & artists looking for work. Just a thought :/
I admire your perseverance, just wish it would go into something more productive. This project is not.
I appreciate you asking and being open about it, as well as not becoming defensive, especially considering the amount of work that has gone into the site.
Ideas that come to mind:
If it is to be a professional level tool for marketing I would do away with ANY gimicky stuff like the "vs." ratings.
Small portfolio pages that may allow reviews, testimonials and comments possibly.
A way for the designer/illustrator/artist to easily share their resume, contact info.
Plenty of social or sharing sites exist that have the right tools but they aren't focused on design and illustration of course (and actually plenty are, they just aren't professional enough). Things like Flickr or even DA are close in format. I would think a streamlined Flickr crossed with something like Carbon Made(?) or Coppermine(?) would have potential. You may want to expand your research into architecture and interior design network/marketing sites for ideas as well.
Would up/down votes, similar to a reddit integrated into our current format be better than a 'vs. comparison'?
We would like to go above & beyond just being a portfolio site for you. Which as you say, begins with streamlining a product like a carbonmade/flickr mixture for designers.
No professional is going to post their work to be voted on. If they're a pro they have nothing to gain and everything to lose. If the pros don't sign up only the worst of the wannabes will.
Would it be more preferable to have people browsing your art/design to have the option to collect it, and share it on their collecting profiles? & the most collected designers would appear in Top Rated/ popular.
Sorry, but no.Be bold and register? lol.
I'm the user, you are the website. You need to make it enticing for ME and give ME a reason to look at your site. I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm trying to offer you some constructive criticism. Many people operate this way and by pointing it out, I've done all I can. Now you know.
You can feel free to ignore it or you can make it more accessible to the passerby so you actually get people using your site. With millions of websites in the world, people need to have a REASON to go to your site.
And giving them a browse-able version that doesn't require a login is fairly basic for this type of site.
As I mentioned before, this seems like a "Hot or Not" of art.
The website, Hot or Not, did not require any form on login. Anyone could go to it, vote immediately, and then leave if they wanted. That created a fairly viral scenario where people would tell their friends to look at it. The easier something is to use, the more people will use it (if it interests them). Of course, it's worth noting "Hot or Not" was popular about 12 years ago.....so I have no idea if such a site would be popular today.
We are wondering if you the user would use a site that is similar to this pair comparison, but allows only employers to go through the art in pairs and it suggests the top picks of their preferences for them to place in the job? You would receive the private info of which pieces the employers were and were not picking without anyone else seeing the results.
Honestly? Voting system isn't going to work.
"Guys" FYI the rest of the staff have nothing to do with it, bringing up what is censored on the site means you need to take it up with the person in charge. Bringing it up on random threads is not changing the outcome and is frustrating the other admins.
I'm sorry but I don't think you are quite grasping how the art industry works.
1. Why should anyone post work on your site if they could recieve negative votes?
2. Who is going to pay to post jobs when so many places are clammering to post them for free?
The answer to both those questions is probably the same. If you had a huge following then you might get some employers willing to pay for getting their job featured, but not many. So far I don't see that you're offering anything to the professional artists. They are your target market. Find a way to appeal to them and everyone else will come running.
I said in your last thread, what artists need is someway to coordinate all of their social media updates from a single non-confusing/spamming location.
Think linkedin, twitter, blogs, facebook, tumblr... et al. Be a professional interface that saves time and hassel and people will use it.
Wasn't facebook initially founded on the idea that photos of students would be put on display for a "who is prettier?" vote and it was quickly taken down as many students got offended?
I might be confusing it with something else, though. Just reminded me.
I don't understand what the difference to deviantart would be, apart from a more confrontational voting system (as supposed to favoring, page views and daily deviations). Deviantart is expanding in the areas of social networking and I guess it will only be a matter of time that you can link fb with dA seaminglessly.
I mean, cghub could be described as a more serious form of deviantart with similar ambitions like yours, yet most artists seem to use these sites only in addition to own online portfolios and websites.
The difference being, their ranking systems are based on positive actions such as views/faved/comments as you stated. What you've proposed is a ranking system based on negative actions such as being voted down. They sound simular but they're are totally different. The positive systems are barely there they're an organic byproduct of the sites use. A negative system would be heavily felt. I still don't believe it would do well, because who will have the right to vote?.. And why should we let anyone have the power to vote on our hard work. Their isn't any incentive for pro's to post their work to have it compared to that of 13yr olds. It just won't happen.
Right, your voting system would produce "Mediocrity".
http://muddycolors.blogspot.com/2012/06/mediocrity.htmlIf everyone likes your work, it's probably a good indicator that you're doing something wrong.