Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 57

Thread: A question of functionality in sci fi designs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Glasgow, UK.
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 47 Times in 32 Posts

    A question of functionality in sci fi designs

    Just wondering if I'm the only one who gets annoyed at sci fi design these days, especially designs of robots and armoured suit type things.

    When I was a kid I would look at Warhammer 40k space marine miniatures and try to image the human being inside. The guy had to be at least 10 heads tall. I can deal with that one, it says in the fluff that these guys are superhuman and huge. But then comes the question of proportion. To fit into the suit you had to have 5 head wide shoulders, a tiny waist and enormous legs. Another example of this is the battle suit from Starcraft 2, see example attached.

    Attachment 1506670

    Another point i wanted to make are the bipedal walker robots. There is a reason we don't make them in real life! And this reason is because they fall over. I just imagine someone coming up to one of these mechs and throwing a stone in their center of gravity. Unless they have some really really advanced AI, the three points of contact thing will not happen and they will topple.

    Anyway, that's just some of my thoughts on the topic. What do you think?

    So is functionality important in your designs, or does it just have to look cool. Discussion - go!
    Blog - Check it out. It's fun.

    Sketchbook - I should really update more often.

    Portfolio - The most fun of them all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    HELLsinki, Finland
    Posts
    4,853
    Thanks
    345
    Thanked 2,690 Times in 1,647 Posts
    It depends. If I'm expecting the thing to work in real life, then stuff like that would bother me, but if it's something like Warhammer 4K then I'll say whatever (I'm pretty sure even the creators are aware how ridiculous the suits are) as long as it invokes at least the Rule of Cool.
    I mean there's a lot of things that just wouldn't work in real life (there's a reason why there still aren't even quadrupedal robots in actual use, let alone bipedal), but that's partly why at least I want to see them in fiction.
    "I eat comics and poop stylization"
    Comic!
    Sketchbook (Critiques, no compliments please.)
    Tumblr
    Website
    Livejournal
    DeviantArt
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Gdansk, Poland
    Posts
    4,834
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 1,568 Times in 753 Posts
    Keep in mind there are many different "subgenres" in sci-fi. They usually have different level attention to technological realism and most of the time it's intentional. For example space opera or science fantasy (like wh40k) usually have less functional design than near-future or hard sci-fi.

    Unfortunately hard sci-fi appears less in games and movies for many reasons.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    1,221
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 1,535 Times in 567 Posts
    I love the rule of cool. Thinks gyros, hydraulics etc. but really sophisticated. Avatar did an interesting suit. If you would have drawn someone 100 years ago listening to music on something the size of large postage stamp people would have written this same kind of thing in a CA newspaper discussion group.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Glasgow, UK.
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 47 Times in 32 Posts
    The rule of cool is a very, very cool rule. It's like Feng Zhu said in one of his tutorials, that it doesn't matter what you draw, as long as it looks cool.

    I tend to agree with you TinyBird, but things like that still annoy me. I'm sure all of us watched a sci fi film and shouted at the screen, "That would never work!!!". Or maybe I'm just a nutter who shouts at his TV

    And just as an aside, four legged walkers do exist and are feasible. Prime, and the only, example being DOG used by the US military right now. It's a great design and is a basis of all my artistic endeavours.

    I guess good design has to combine some "cool" and some functionality in equal dosage.
    Blog - Check it out. It's fun.

    Sketchbook - I should really update more often.

    Portfolio - The most fun of them all.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    5,234
    Thanks
    3,512
    Thanked 4,906 Times in 2,547 Posts
    For me it has to A) Look cool...and A) look reasonably functional. And vice-versa. To me funtional is cool. I can't think of a single cool sci-fi design that also doesn't look reasonably well designed and thought out.

    Now "cool" can sometimes be clunky or campy or retro or any number of things. When I design things I always think to myself, "Would Syd dig this?"...that helps keep me on track.
    What would Caravaggio do?
    _________________________

    Portfolio
    Plein Air
    Digital
    Still Life
    Sight Measuring
    Fundamentals
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JeffX99 For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    11,438
    Thanks
    3,793
    Thanked 5,854 Times in 3,958 Posts
    I keep thinking, 'How the heck would they take a dump?' with most of them.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    2,626
    Thanks
    3,340
    Thanked 5,793 Times in 1,165 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Spot View Post
    I keep thinking, 'How the heck would they take a dump?' with most of them.
    Built-in toilet. Or a tube.
    "I wish to paint in such a manner as if I were photographing dreams" - Zdzislaw Beksinski
    My Happy Little Sketchbook, please check it out and help me get better!

    My TUMBLR!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,000
    Thanks
    2,842
    Thanked 6,100 Times in 2,487 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Spot View Post
    I keep thinking, 'How the heck would they take a dump?' with most of them.
    Bombs away trap door?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  12. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    11,438
    Thanks
    3,793
    Thanked 5,854 Times in 3,958 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dpaint View Post
    Bombs away trap door?
    One hopes they don't get the squits then.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    1,221
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 1,535 Times in 567 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Spot View Post
    I keep thinking, 'How the heck would they take a dump?' with most of them.
    I built one. It's a recycling system. Comes out, goes into a easy bake synthesizer and out pops a high energy snack. Goes right to the mouth through the suit. No touch no fuss.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Santa Barbara, California, United States
    Posts
    475
    Thanks
    332
    Thanked 266 Times in 137 Posts
    How do they fit in the suit? The obvious solution is that they simply amputate all four major limbs and replace them with extendable bendy robot arms.

    A question of functionality in sci fi designs
    ~ ~ { My sketchbooK } ~ ~
    Santa Barbara Drawing Group, On Meetup.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    So-Cal
    Posts
    3,426
    Thanks
    2,994
    Thanked 1,779 Times in 850 Posts
    Anybody else think all of those designs are boring. It's okay if they are genuinely going for irreverent, fun and whimsical, but they're usually not. They are typically Liefeild-esque.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. when we draw do we consider its functionality
    By Vay in forum ART DlSCUSSION
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: October 21st, 2009, 03:35 AM
  2. social group discussion functionality
    By Rist in forum SUPPORT
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 14th, 2009, 04:44 AM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: November 28th, 2007, 06:52 PM
  4. question about distressing designs
    By lazerviking in forum PHOTOSHOP
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 19th, 2006, 07:09 PM
  5. functionality problem
    By Zakarian in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 11th, 2003, 05:39 AM

Members who have read this thread: 5

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook