Results 1 to 13 of 27
June 21st, 2012 #1
Why paint in gray scale before color?
Hey Guys, so i have a question about painting color in Photoshop.
I often see people paint somthing in gray scale, then paint on top of that in color.
I guess Its useful to got the right values before going into color. But isn't it time consuming? Why not go straight into color?
Can anyone elucidate the benefits of painting in gray scale before color? besides the one i just mentioned.
Immoral Cintiq's Sketchbook
"Society will DRAW a circle that shuts me out, but my superior thoughts will DRAW me in." -Marva Collins
"Character is what you know you are not what others think you are." -Marva Collins
Hide this ad by registering as a memberJune 21st, 2012 #2
Some people do and some don't. I don't see the point either unless you have problems painting in colour.
The Following User Says Thank You to Black Spot For This Useful Post:
June 21st, 2012 #3
The Following User Says Thank You to Arshes Nei For This Useful Post:
June 22nd, 2012 #4
There are two typical reasons. One, certain techniques rely on having a monochrome underpainting under a colored glaze. Two, making a monochrome sketch often helps with visualizing the values without chroma getting in the way. In the first case, you paint over the grizaille, in the second, you just use it as a reference study.
June 22nd, 2012 #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
June 22nd, 2012 #6
Working in achromatic neutrals is for preparatory purposes.
From your perspective, the redundancy that you think of as wasting time actually saves time for those invested in using the process.
Separating the channels of color (Lightness from Hue and Chroma for surfaces) allows for a sort of binary decision process.
A polychromatic process (full color) would require much more complex senary decision making process.
The problem with a polychromatic process is that the variable dimensions have tripled and this leads to a higher chance of getting things wrong. It does not mean someone with a strong framework of color cannot walk the line, it just means it is more difficult.
When designing a process reducing complexity often makes the entire system less dependent on constraints. This means that things can get done quicker and separately. Increasing redundancy in a system may actually be a benefit because it decreases the chance of error or failure. Its about design process. You should know why you do things and for what purpose.
Last edited by kinjark; June 22nd, 2012 at 08:17 AM.- Kinjark
June 22nd, 2012 #7
If you are working in gray scale first it usually means you are working from construction not from life. Your image is made from photos and other reference and pieced together. In this way it saves you time because you can work right on the preparatory work. When working from observation and life this isn't practical; especially outdoors and if you did it would just create more work for yourself not less.
June 22nd, 2012 #8Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm working on a grayscale because it saves a lot of time later when building shadows, etc. When working on grayscale you don't pay attention later to the light/shadow proportion in your work. And I never work from photos or references because it makes your work lifeless
June 22nd, 2012 #9
June 22nd, 2012 #10
June 22nd, 2012 #11
The Following User Says Thank You to HunterKiller_ For This Useful Post:
June 22nd, 2012 #12
The same would hold true for digital painting. There was an interesting post by Serge Bierault on Muddy Colors today. He usually works directly with color but did a grayscale to try it and actually saved time but didn't like the piece as much. I liked the moodiness he created. Both work or don't depending upon the artist.
As far as reference goes, better do a little homework.
June 23rd, 2012 #13