Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Earful of Banana
June 12th, 2012 #1
Earful of Banana
-Removed all the crap imaginative works...starting fresh on this same thread (not deleting it) and posting studies.
Last edited by Featheredface; July 29th, 2012 at 10:27 AM.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberJune 12th, 2012 #2
Last edited by Featheredface; July 29th, 2012 at 10:32 AM.
July 2nd, 2012 #3
So, what about some studies from real life that actually get into the structure of the thing, not just cartoon dogs which are not at all in perspective?
It just feels weird when you constantly say you want critique and feedback, start new sketchbooks, post new threads and always ask for feedback and critique but I have rarely seen you actually follow any feedback or critique you get, especially on your imaginary work and you always keep posting the same thing over and over.
Last edited by TinyBird; July 2nd, 2012 at 04:53 AM.
July 11th, 2012 #4
But when I do studies, nothing looks 100% like the picture/reference, it's frustrating. I want to do enviroment studies, even if only to gain a better understanding of colour and it's relations in the natural world. But,...I try to look and analyze the colours in the photo but always fall short.
Should I be approaching it differently?
July 16th, 2012 #5
But honestly it just sounds like you're trying to jump to things that are too hard for you yet. If you can't get a grayscale image right, trying to get a colour image right will be harder and if you can't draw something right, it's a lot harder to paint it right.
Like the classic beginner mistake when beginners want to draw scenes that have several people with three point perspective and dragons when they can't even draw one person or one point perspective or a real animal right.
So my suggestion would be, learn to draw (and specifically construct your subject by drawing) first. And you've gotten loads of advice on this subject already.
But I say this:
I want to do enviroment studies, (...) natural world. But,...I try to look and analyze the colours in the photo
Sometimes you just make everything harder for yourself when you work on a computer.
Last edited by TinyBird; July 16th, 2012 at 04:23 PM.
July 18th, 2012 #6
Thank you for your reply, Tinybird.
With that I present my first (pitiful) attempt at Plein air. I sat on a hill overlooking a corn field wit ha gorgeous view of the corn ears, treeline, then a sky with a spot of whitish yellow sun. The corn stalk tips, together in the hundreds, burred into a coat of raw sienna, with fain sap green base, the trees a dark, blueish green.
However, I totally f'ed it up. Everything is symbols. The sky blue, vegetation green. I HAD the colours in mind and identified, however, my own idiocy prevented me from accurately representing them on canvas. I lay the acrylic paints down too thick, for one, so new colours would just blurr and disappear into the main green and blue. My efforts were cut short as rain began to come down (grr)
I'm going to try the same spot tomorrow. And make an effort to do a quick (just enough to get the colours and basic shapes down.) at least once every day or every other day. I live by a river, a wooded area, fields, farm land, so I have plenty of natural landscapes to spot.
I also am going to do at least one, or two, 20-30 minute photo studies of nude models off of dA's stock resources. (I've found quite a bit of good, unfiltered and raw images of models of varying size and shape and age to practice with.
My only problem is procrastination,..it is my biggest downfall in most areas of my life. HFLKFHLFH (Hence why most threads end with me saying "yeah Ill do it,,,then never 'get around to it' )
Anywho, thank you for reading, all.
July 29th, 2012 #7
Did some studies this morning, from photo reference....and I going in the right direction? Critique? This is only a sample, really, once I get a sense of what I am doing okay and what I am going about in an incorrect way, I'll refine and do more pages each day.
August 3rd, 2012 #8
Did a quick portrait study today! My only few nitpicks are that I wish there was more contrast/definition in the face/flesh, as it looks flat and too blended.
Also, a timeline of progress with portrait studies. It's in no way the peak of what is possible, it's just keeping tabs on differences and, dare I say; Improvement? in the art.