Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 43

Thread: Confused about advanced graphite drawings

  1. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    1,692
    Thanks
    30
    Thanked 571 Times in 412 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Spot View Post
    Graphite is better than oil in a lot of places. Also may be the next generation of chips. /derail
    Potato chips are sooooo 20th century...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    45
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
    Time is the technique.

    Drawings like these are full of patients.

    Check out David Kassan:
    Confused about advanced graphite drawings
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Shaggnasty For This Useful Post:


  5. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The land of fast cars and loud guitars.
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    55
    Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
    I want to chime in on the smearing versus not smearing comments since that decision will be important to the OP's exploration of this type of drawing. First let me say, be sure to try both, giving both a fair shake. I'll give some observations on each.

    Lee Hammond is a good example of the smearing style and she does some impressive work with it. However, there are some things about that style that I dislike. For one, everything seems to look kinda muddy to me, both my results with the technique and even what I see from Lee. Another thing to watch out for is that if you are too aggressive with the stump (press down too hard) it can ruin the tooth of the paper, not allowing you to go back and push the darks when you need to. To do drawings like you posted you'll probably need to use a pretty smooth paper to begin with and you don't want to hurt the tooth you've got. I also found it surprisingly difficult to control the graphite in this manner; I'd frequently end up moving too much and having too little contrast in a gradient and it's harder than it seems to pull graphite out smoothly.

    In the end I found it best to just put the graphite where I wanted it to begin with. As sharp and precise as a pencil is, it is ideally suited for that anyway. Here is a video of another artist that uses this method and talks about that choice and shows you what you can do without smearing.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9p-1200V2Q
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to mizunodave For This Useful Post:


  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hudson River valley, NY
    Posts
    16,211
    Thanks
    4,879
    Thanked 16,685 Times in 5,022 Posts
    Lee Hammond isn't a good example of anything, except what not to do. Oog.

    Tristan Elwell
    **Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial

    "Work is more fun than fun."
    -John Cale

    "Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
    -Marc Maron
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Elwell For This Useful Post:


  9. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    737
    Thanks
    477
    Thanked 497 Times in 270 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Elwell View Post
    Lee Hammond isn't a good example of anything, except what not to do. Oog.
    How so?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #19
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hudson River valley, NY
    Posts
    16,211
    Thanks
    4,879
    Thanked 16,685 Times in 5,022 Posts
    Ugly, flat, rubbery, boring, plastic, formless, amateurish, "photographic" (in every negative sense)... shall I go on? She's Christopher Hart for the blue-haired lady set.

    Tristan Elwell
    **Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial

    "Work is more fun than fun."
    -John Cale

    "Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
    -Marc Maron
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Elwell For This Useful Post:


  12. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    737
    Thanks
    477
    Thanked 497 Times in 270 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Elwell View Post
    Ugly, flat, rubbery, boring, plastic, formless, amateurish, "photographic" (in every negative sense)... shall I go on? She's Christopher Hart for the blue-haired lady set.
    Well I certainly won't stop you. I don't have enough sensitivity in that area to pick up why things don't work, just that to me they're 'ehh'.

    Does anyone have an idea/suggestion on how long the model poses are for those drawings?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York, NY, USA 10002
    Posts
    883
    Thanks
    800
    Thanked 306 Times in 212 Posts
    I use the soft, pink colored spongy stuff I found in the pastel section at Dickblick(they come in taped off plastic bags like the portable niji waterbrushes, which I threw away and so don't know the brand name). They come in tips, pads, and palette knife shapes, and the palette knife in particular requires you to fit the spongy stuff onto the palette tip first. They look like make-up blenders, and you can probably also use make-up pads for blending.

    They blend easily, and you won't need to force it as much as if when using a paper blending stump, which hardens the paper's surface.

    People also use brushes to blend. One in particular that I remember was a classmate at a French atelier course, and he used a fan brush, while I used those pink, soft make-up like blenders that I got at Dickblick.

    However, most of the blending in the atelier method comes from filling up the white paper with a very thin pencil. The thinness of the pencil tip allows for a lot of value control. As such, accidents, bad or good, occur less often. The task is tedious, because it involves filling in every tiny white spot that stands out too much from an area of gradation in order to harmonize the flow of values. This means you have to sharpen the pencil a lot to fill in those tiny white spots. I, on the other hand, skipped most of this part by using the soft blending tools I bought.
    Last edited by Vay; May 30th, 2012 at 12:01 AM.
    My Sketchbook

    Twinkle, twinkle little star
    I don't wonder what you are
    For by spectroscopic ken
    I know that you are hydrogen - Ian D.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vay For This Useful Post:


  15. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    4,543
    Thanks
    2,307
    Thanked 2,122 Times in 871 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Vay View Post
    I use the soft, pink colored spongy stuff I found in the pastel section at Dickblick(they come in taped off plastic bags like the portable niji waterbrushes, which I threw the away and so don't know the brand name). They come in tips, pads, and palette knife shapes, and the palette knife in particular requires you to fit the spongy stuff onto the palette tip first. They look like make-up blenders, and you can probably also use make-up pads for blending.

    They blend easily, and you won't need to force it as much as if when using a paper blending stump, which hardens the paper's surface.

    People also use brushes to blend. One in particular that I remember was a classmate at a French atelier course, and he used a fan brush, while I used those pink, soft make-up like blenders that I got at Dickblick.
    You're talking about pan pastel applicators.

    There's always a risk when blending that you'll destroy your carefully plotted shadow shapes. The difficulty when smudging is to retain them. Sometimes it works, other times it doesn't. Of course you can always return and clarify as well. Everyone has their own technique; there's no good or bad technique, only good and bad artists.

    Personally, I'd never ever use charcoal without smudging but I often use graphite without.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to OldJake666 For This Useful Post:


  17. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,531
    Thanks
    6,809
    Thanked 348 Times in 275 Posts

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Elwell View Post
    Ugly, flat, rubbery, boring, plastic, formless, amateurish, "photographic" (in every negative sense)... shall I go on? She's Christopher Hart for the blue-haired lady set.
    But at least Chris Hart is making plenty of $$$$ in art. Chicks flock to him cos' he's rich. If I had to list down another idol besides the usual suspects like Feng Zhu and Vilppu, it would be him. LOL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  18. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    79
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 54 Times in 41 Posts
    The second drawing is by Angela Cunningham. She comes from the Grand Central Academy. They do not use any stomping or blending. Neither do they really use hatching. It's all built up with careful pencil strokes, working from piece to piece, until everything is smooth. Knowledge of form plays the biggest part. You imagine as if you are working in 3D, sculpting with the pencil, crawling over the form.
    Last edited by Norkagar; May 30th, 2012 at 02:12 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Norkagar For This Useful Post:


  20. #25
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    266
    Thanked 127 Times in 95 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Xeon_OND View Post
    But at least Chris Hart is making plenty of $$$$ in art. Chicks flock to him cos' he's rich. If I had to list down another idol besides the usual suspects like Feng Zhu and Vilppu, it would be him. LOL
    great marketing makes up for a lot of art 'sins'
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kayness For This Useful Post:


  22. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,134
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 691 Times in 418 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Elwell View Post
    Ugly, flat, rubbery, boring, plastic, formless, amateurish, "photographic" (in every negative sense)... shall I go on? She's Christopher Hart for the blue-haired lady set.
    Never heard of her, so I had to go Google around. It's one of those cases where I think: I'll never be able to do that. Neither would I want to. :-)
    ____________________________________________
    My sketchbook thread:
    http://www.conceptart.org/forums/sho...ight=blogmatix
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Advanced Perspective drawings
    By art-of-tennis in forum ART DlSCUSSION
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: April 1st, 2012, 05:47 PM
  2. SketchBook: Good Old Graphite Pencil Drawings - Dac's Sketchbook, Enjoy
    By dac in forum Sketchbooks
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: August 17th, 2011, 05:55 PM
  3. Looking for an Advanced Critique...
    By Leona Windrider in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTER
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 16th, 2007, 08:46 PM
  4. SketchBook: graphite and charcoal drawings
    By ayouya in forum Sketchbooks
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 26th, 2005, 02:44 PM
  5. Art: graphite and charcoal drawings
    By ayouya in forum FINISHED ART & ARTWORK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 28th, 2005, 11:32 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook