Results 31 to 56 of 56
Thread: Invisible art?
May 25th, 2012 #31
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMay 25th, 2012 #32
May 25th, 2012 #33
Well, there's one way to create "philosophical art" without any effort, unless you consider staring on and off at a white board for 40 days a difficult task.
May 27th, 2012 #34
Twinkle, twinkle little star
I don't wonder what you are
For by spectroscopic ken
I know that you are hydrogen - Ian D.
May 27th, 2012 #35
I've suffered an internal injury caused by laughing, after I read all the posts and enjoyed the very art and its meaning... lololololol
May 27th, 2012 #36
I think it would be fitting to held an invisible press conference to comemorate this milestone event. After that the invisible journalists would publish their invisible reports in their invisible journals. If all this would not set fire the imagination of their invisible readers then I don't know what would!
May 27th, 2012 #37
May 27th, 2012 #38"Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
June 6th, 2012 #39
June 9th, 2012 #40
this is stupid as hell.
click and crit
June 11th, 2012 #41
The thread is valid in this person was exposing us to something that is happening in the art world. And asking for opinions. I for one commend the originator. When a joke goes vile, then it shows the characters of those keeping it that way.....And there is a lot to be said for being sophmoric.....
June 11th, 2012 #42
Its not the creators' of the gallery and its amazing art pieces that are at fault; it's the people that buy tickets/waste their time to go to these expositions who are being dumb.
June 12th, 2012 #43
There was a worse exhibit earlier. It was some project backed my James Franco where people made invisible art but there was nothing tangible at all about the piece other then the name and description tag. One lady in Canada bought a 10,000$ rip-off from them.
The great news is that it mathematically simply can't get worse then this.
June 12th, 2012 #44
June 13th, 2012 #45
The blank canvas reminded of me White on White: http://www.moma.org/collection/objec...bject_id=80385
And almost 100 years later we get… nothing on nothing. Love it! here's $20,000
"Great job guys! I love you. You're fired."
Sketchbook! Me vs Anatomy (and other things)
The Following User Says Thank You to Januz For This Useful Post:
June 19th, 2012 #46
I'm disappointed to not have thought of it first.
I self-published a book on the fundamentals of drawing from life.
June 19th, 2012 #47
June 19th, 2012 #48
The one thing that gives me a bit of sanity is knowing that if i were to put this in a time machine and bring it 1000, or 2000 years in the future and tell the future people this is art, they'd probably still have the same reaction we're all having right now.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."
--- Frank Herbert, Dune - Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
Check out my Sketchbook! Critique and Criticism welcomed.
or my Deviantart!
· or check out my: Blog
August 13th, 2012 #49
August 13th, 2012 #50
August 14th, 2012 #51Registered User
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Thanked 102 Times in 80 Posts
Noone in that exhibition is making millions, the safe assumption would be that it will end quietly with a couple pieces sold for some modest amount that is meant for the artist rather than the work itself and the only real impact it will have on anything is stirring up a couple thousand "Has the world gone nuts" chain e-mails by boring people and headshaking from reactionaries like the artrenewal.org guy
August 14th, 2012 #52
Yeah, that's true it's probably not making them a ton of money. Still I feel like these sorts of things have a big part to play in the whole "Fries with that" treatment you get stuck with.
August 14th, 2012 #53Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Ussr :P
- Thanked 24 Times in 11 Posts
Well i read the article didn't think it was very good. I just couldn't see the attraction of this exibition.
August 14th, 2012 #54
This artist has truly learned how to draw the unseen ear. Loomis would be proud.
And then God said, "Let us make man in our likeness and our image. Let us make him ridiculously hard to draw so that poor artists everywhere will have to spend 10,000+ hours failing repeatedly before they can begin to capture the form and likeness onto a two-dimensional surface." And there was man. And it was good. And artists everywhere lost their minds.
August 14th, 2012 #55
Aw, when I saw the title I was hoping this thread was going to be about matte painting
August 17th, 2012 #56
Glow in the dark paint/blue light paint that can only be seen in the dark or under UV light?
Ever just woken up and gone "shit, does the world around me exist"?