Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 41

Thread: A trend I noticed now that I have a tumblr

  1. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Torrance, CA
    Posts
    6,802
    Thanks
    2,278
    Thanked 4,258 Times in 2,074 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JDSart View Post

    Also Sakimichan gets lots of undeserving crap for someone who obviosly has skills and makes a lot of effort posting new stuff constantly.
    You don't need to mention her a lot. I know other artists that get the same kind of crap too She's not a a prime example imo.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Arshes Nei For This Useful Post:


  4. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Caracas
    Posts
    734
    Thanks
    261
    Thanked 1,191 Times in 293 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Arshes Nei View Post
    You don't need to mention her a lot. I know other artists that get the same kind of crap too She's not a a prime example imo.
    oh, i repeat myself don´t i?

    White knighting is not my thing, but i guess shes the name i keep noticing being singled out lately, not just here.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    906
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked 332 Times in 273 Posts
    I've never noticed this trend on tumblr. But then again I mostly just follow architecture, natural science and fashion blogs.

    In my opinion there's only so many variations that one can do with a portrait....and if an artist only does portraits well they end up getting repetitive.
    ---
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    169
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
    I dunno, I can't say I'm a fan of Kawasaki and Mark Ryden... to me, it's not that they don't have skill, but that they just slip into a "style" so the consistency bothers me. Think Garfield the comic strip.

    A trademark is good but my personal opinion is that it shouldn't be a crutch (and that conceptual trademarks seem to be stronger and age better than visual ones). Again, just my opinion, I did like pop surrealism when it first surfaced but now new pop surrealist artists adopt the visual language without really exploring it.

    Personally, I could have liked Kawasaki, but seeing that she paints the same thing over and over just irks me to the point where I don't find that I like it at all. And really, that's why I get a little fatigued looking at pop surrealism now. It seems to be just rehashes of the same stuff. Cool at first, but do something different now! I guess I value a little bit of visual risk.

    Edit: bcarmen... so you can paint pug asses? I'd like to see that
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    2,337
    Thanks
    1,074
    Thanked 2,200 Times in 1,055 Posts
    The fine art and illustration worlds have always had trends and always will... Often what happens is someone comes up with a unique "look" or unusual themes and gets attention, their work becomes popular, and suddenly everyone wants similar work. So other artists start doing similar work, because hey, that's what sells...

    Though personally if I see one more ironic deer/girl with antlers/jellyfish in shades of hipster acid, I think I'll scream.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #19
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hudson River valley, NY
    Posts
    16,211
    Thanks
    4,879
    Thanked 16,685 Times in 5,022 Posts
    I actually find the whole woodgrain thing more overplayed than the subject matter.

    Tristan Elwell
    **Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial

    Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!

    "Work is more fun than fun."
    -John Cale

    "Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
    -Marc Maron
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Elwell For This Useful Post:


  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    1,221
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 1,535 Times in 567 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bodied View Post
    I dunno, I can't say I'm a fan of Kawasaki and Mark Ryden... to me, it's not that they don't have skill, but that they just slip into a "style" so the consistency bothers me. Think Garfield the comic strip.

    A trademark is good but my personal opinion is that it shouldn't be a crutch (and that conceptual trademarks seem to be stronger and age better than visual ones). Again, just my opinion, I did like pop surrealism when it first surfaced but now new pop surrealist artists adopt the visual language without really exploring it.

    Personally, I could have liked Kawasaki, but seeing that she paints the same thing over and over just irks me to the point where I don't find that I like it at all. And really, that's why I get a little fatigued looking at pop surrealism now. It seems to be just rehashes of the same stuff. Cool at first, but do something different now! I guess I value a little bit of visual risk.

    Edit: bcarmen... so you can paint pug asses? I'd like to see that
    Even glimpses of my pugs' asses command high fees.

    If you go back in history you will find that most painters/artists tend to explore in series or directions. Some of those directions can last longer than others some can last a lifetime. You need to remember in the scheme of things that Kawasaki is a very young artist and Ryden is not all that old either.

    Mark Ryden is a completely different ball of wax than Audrey Kawasaki. For one thing he is an excellent painter. Kawasaki's work, for now at least, is about decorative image and not as much about paint. If you look at Ryden's body of work it is very diverse with repeating images as symbols. He has achieved something far beyond Kawasaki so lumping them together is a mistake.

    So give me a genre and an artist you really like and we can find repetition and even mimicry.

    Is it just me or do a lot of (amateur?) digital illustrators tend to paint the same blank-faced woman staring straight at the viewer?
    And by the way Audrey Kawasaki's work isn't digital. Not sure why she came up other than the portrait repetition thing.
    Last edited by bcarman; May 7th, 2012 at 11:45 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bcarman For This Useful Post:


  12. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    169
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
    She isn't digital, true, but I think what I dislike about Kawasaki's work is the lack of diversity... for goodness sake, it's all the same composition! Central female face with lacy bits flowing around. I know that many artists work in series (Francis Bacon being one of my favorites, and lord knows he stuck with a theme for years like the popes or heads) but it's just... repetitive. I dunno. I guess I'm just tired of the mystic female with the bedroom gaze thing. Some of these new illustrators have great skill - just wish I could see what else they can do.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Haifa, Israel
    Posts
    4,525
    Thanks
    2,469
    Thanked 2,523 Times in 1,570 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Elwell View Post
    I like Audrey's stuff quite a bit, and judging by her sales, I'm not alone. But yes, she has legion of imitators.
    I have nothing against her technique or skill, and I see why a lot of people like this stuff... but good gravy, the same face and the throng of imitators!

    And yes, consistency sells. Being a one-trick pony can be beneficial if your trick is in demand. Besides, it's easier to remember a gimmick than to get familiar with an illustrator's full skill set.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    OC,CA
    Posts
    765
    Thanks
    427
    Thanked 377 Times in 152 Posts
    For what it's worth, she CAN do other things. She has sketchbooks on her site which, if I recall, exhibit much greater variety. Similar style, still, but more risky poses and faces and even regular studies and life drawings which aren't so heavily stylized.

    She also does a lot of craft projects. I don't think she's a one trick pony, I think she just has one FAMOUS trick that gets a lot of attention. Not her fault. It's a pretty trick.
    'Cuz life is full of your regrets, and I should be one...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  15. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    2,337
    Thanks
    1,074
    Thanked 2,200 Times in 1,055 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PuppyKitten View Post
    I don't think she's a one trick pony, I think she just has one FAMOUS trick that gets a lot of attention. Not her fault. It's a pretty trick.
    The bane of popular artists everywhere. It's like Maxfield Parrish and his "girls on rocks"...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  16. #25
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    3,234
    Thanks
    860
    Thanked 848 Times in 457 Posts
    And like Boris and Julie who get asked to redo their National Lampoon poster over and over and over...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  17. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Boise, ID
    Posts
    1,221
    Thanks
    887
    Thanked 1,535 Times in 567 Posts
    I guess this is a good ethical question. If you knew that you could make say at least $100,000 a year and achieve a certain kind of celebrity repeating a kind of image over and over, or at least a stylistic approach over and over, would you? Of course the question would suppose that you were skilled and good enough to have the choice.

    My career has been a test of this in some ways. One of the reasons I ultimately chose teaching as part of what I do is that I can jump in any direction and still feed the family. I've had opportunities and cues which would have taken me in very lucrative directions but eschewed them. Sometimes I regret it mostly not.

    I think many of these very visible artists have learned the marketing game which the internet provides. They have grown up digitally and working cyberspace is natural to them. Even if we see artists whose images seem to never change, we never know if it is the extent of what they can and do do. I said do do. It's easy to criticize but what would you do if money and fame were being waved in your face.
    Last edited by bcarman; May 7th, 2012 at 11:45 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bcarman For This Useful Post:


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 25th, 2011, 06:21 PM
  2. Blogger vs Wordpress vs Tumblr
    By flash jordan in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 4th, 2011, 12:15 PM
  3. Anyone here have Tumblr?
    By Dorkthrone in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: October 8th, 2010, 01:33 AM
  4. Just noticed a new thing about myself.
    By sve in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: April 10th, 2006, 12:14 AM
  5. How to get noticed
    By Sanby in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 28th, 2004, 08:13 PM

Members who have read this thread: 5

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook