Results 1 to 11 of 11
Thread: Animal Shading
May 5th, 2012 #1
I would love to get critique on this shading - especially the light and shadow work.
Should I put colored light in?
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMay 5th, 2012 #2
This is ok, but the background is awful and we should be able to see the foxes other leg/hand? the lighting's ok as well but i dont think it makes a lot of sense if you really evaluate it closely.
some progression shots would help, are you underlaying paint under line, or starting in simple form and complicating from there? for this i think it would be good to start with block forms, treating them as bald creatures then adding fur after you get the forms spot-on.
May 5th, 2012 #3
can you give an explanation why the background is no good?
May 5th, 2012 #4
Is that better?
I don't like it like that because I have no contrast with the fur anymore ;/ are you sure?
May 5th, 2012 #5
I think the reason the background doesn't work is because it's too disconnected from the characters. I can understand why you might want a simple background, but right now they both seem to be floating. Maybe some kind of floor would help? Even just a cast shadow, which might also help communicate the lighting a bit more.
All of the elements are disconnected, like you did them seperately and pasted them together. For example, the foxes hand doesnt seem to be interacting with the wolfs body properly.
I agree with dog-faced. You seem to have gone into rendering the fur too soon, it might have helped to start with simple forms and getting a clearer idea of how the light affects it.
That being said, I like the way you're going with it. Great characters
The Following User Says Thank You to Zink For This Useful Post:
May 5th, 2012 #6
May 5th, 2012 #7
May 5th, 2012 #8
May 5th, 2012 #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Thanked 69 Times in 51 Posts
Lhune, that's beyond hilarious! xD
May 6th, 2012 #10
May 7th, 2012 #11Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I dont really think there was anything wrong with the background in the first place. If you put a decent cast shadow in there, we will see where the characters are.
Although, you seem to have put a lot of work into making that texture, Maybe even more work/time than it would have taken to create a minimalistic forest-y backdrop?
Anyways, I think if this was an illustration in a children's book, which it could, the background might as well be all white.
Details: Wolf has blue stuff in the collar area. and other places. Weird. Also he has no fur on left rear leg.
Have a nice. Sneak.
There are no members to list at the moment.
By tja88 in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 2Last Post: December 21st, 2008, 12:25 AM
By FlameDragon in forum ART DlSCUSSIONReplies: 13Last Post: November 19th, 2007, 10:00 PM
By sparkyy in forum ART TUTORIALS, ART TIPS & ART TRICKS - ARCHIVEReplies: 0Last Post: August 19th, 2007, 10:58 AM
By RaVageR in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 3Last Post: June 14th, 2005, 02:49 PM
By dsg bot in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUPReplies: 36Last Post: March 23rd, 2004, 01:16 PM