Join 500,000+ Artists
Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!
I wonder how images like these were made back then before magazine photoshops their images. This looks like something between an actual photograph and illustration, if it is new I'd just think they are obviously photoshopped or painted on to remove blemishes.
Last edited by enrigo; April 25th, 2012 at 10:21 AM.
It's an illustration bud, plus what you call Photoshop techniques are actually based off real media trickery done in red rooms and studios with real photographs. Sure now everything is automated with one click but it was a whole different thing when you had to do it to tangible pictures.
"Doctors prove Palmolives beauty results!"
Lol really? How? Oh, I see now, they conducted 1285 'scientific tests'
I love old advertising.
1. That looks earlier to me, more '40s than '50s, but I could be wrong.
2. Yes, it is a photo. It may be a tinted B&W, but color photography from the period often has the same look.
3. Tinted B&W or not, it has been retouched. Pre-digital retouching was a combination of darkroom manipulation and airbrush, paint, dyes, bleach, etc. Like retouching today, it ranged from clumsy and obvious to masterfully invisible. Digital retouching started in the '80s with dedicated workstation computers like the Quantel Paintbox.
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
She looks like she kinda has the crazy eye...
...and don't forget the dodgy color printing of the era both helps cover up some dodgy retouching and makes some unretouched photos look as strange as retouched photos.
Bad printing: the great equalizer!