Results 1 to 16 of 16
March 25th, 2012 #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts
What were they using to reproduce artwork in the old days?
I've been going off on a bit of tangent reading lately about the older days of publishing, printing, illustration etc. Some of the tools and equipment they used back then are quite fascinating to read about. One thing I haven't been able to find much information on, though, is some of the methods of reproduction for artwork like posters and stuff. Maybe I'm using the wrong search terms.
Anyway, the most obvious way I can think of is simply photography. Were cameras advanced enough for that kind of thing in say the 70s or something? I'd appreciate any links you guys might have. Thanks.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 25th, 2012 #2
You mean in the 1970s zx? 'Cause back then cameras were pretty primitive...you had to make them yourself out of bark and stuff. And frankly, most folks were more concerned with how big the flare was on their jeans and if that would interfer with their ability to flee from sabretooths.
Edit: Maybe this well help, or at least be fun: Museum of Forgotten Art Supplies.
Actually didn't have much on photography. Art has been reproduced for centuries mainly via etching, woodcut and stone lithography. Photo-reproduction (outside of just printing the photo ) has been around for maybe 150 years? Others I imagine know more on that than myself.
BTW...you're gong to make Elwell weep for the future again.
Last edited by JeffX99; March 25th, 2012 at 07:42 PM.
March 25th, 2012 #3
I'm guessing that I shouldn't bring up that I was one of the the guys that had to paint all those tiny little CMYK dots by hand before the sep camera was invented at the turn of the next century?
No position or belief, whether religious, political or social, is valid if one has to lie to support it.--Alj Mary
Ironically, the concept of SIMPLICITY is most often misunderstood by simple-minded people. --Alj Mary
March 25th, 2012 #4
Taken in 1865 and the uncompressed version is 87mb. Suck it digital.
"Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
The Following User Says Thank You to s.ketch For This Useful Post:
March 26th, 2012 #5
March 26th, 2012 #6
March 26th, 2012 #7
March 26th, 2012 #8
Photography has been around for over 150 years, but began to see use in printed reproduction only much later.
The earliest reproduction method, as old and older as book printing, was engraving.
In many cases, color was added to etchings by hand.
In later half of 19th century, color reproductions were made with chromolithography.
Modern type of offset printing was in use by 1930s.
And yes, cameras were quite advanced in 1970s.
March 26th, 2012 #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Thanked 90 Times in 58 Posts
I probably should have worded that as pre-computers rather than old as in hundreds of years ago. I didn't meant to imply those cameras and stuff were relics of times long forgotten. I can vaguely recall lying in bed last night thinking my thread was going to make a few people groan. Those photos are very impressive. They look better than what I've seen some low end digital cameras produce. I don't know whether that's just because of the camera or post-production stuff? Thanks for humouring me.
March 26th, 2012 #10
The Following User Says Thank You to JeffX99 For This Useful Post:
March 26th, 2012 #11"Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
March 26th, 2012 #12
Last edited by Elwell; March 26th, 2012 at 06:42 AM.
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
The Following User Says Thank You to Elwell For This Useful Post:
March 26th, 2012 #13
In the Victorian era reproductions of popular artworks were made often by other artists copying the original as an etching. These were then mass printed and sold to the public. I believe one of the most reproduced images at the time was 'Light of the World' by Holman Hunt, the original which toured drawing huge crowds.
The Following User Says Thank You to Aly Fell For This Useful Post:
March 26th, 2012 #14
March 26th, 2012 #15
We often take for granted how much we have access to art, and well known imagery these days. It's incredible that people would travel huge distances to see a single popular image that toured, just over a hundred years ago. I think Light of the World essentially went round on the back of a cart! It even went to the US as far as I can remember... It was one of, if not the most popular and reproduced images of the Victorian era, and people would rather a copy of it on their wall than not at all. That it was an allegorical image of Christ kind of helped, no doubt...
March 27th, 2012 #16