De Kooning: A Retrospective at MoMA
 
View testimonialsView Artwork
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    George Town Tasmania Australia
    Posts
    90
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    De Kooning: A Retrospective at MoMA

    Part 1:

    Five of the most famous, or infamous, paintings of Willem de Kooning (1904-1997)---the Woman series from 1950-1953 ---were at a large-scale retrospective exhibition which concluded last month. From 18 September 2011 to 9 January 2012 de Kooning: A Retrospective could be viewed at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. That Dutch-American abstract-expressionist painted what people found, and still find, shocking, truly wild canvasses.

    Woman I which had pride of place at the centre of one wall in the MoMA was flanked by two equally riotous canvases on either side. It had taken de Kooning over two years to complete Woman I. He kept putting it aside. It was only the urgings of American art historian Meyer Schapiro that kept him from destroying it. By the early 1950s de Kooning, some argue, was onto something so new even to himself that he had to make a number of similar paintings before he knew enough to know when Woman I qualified as a finished painting. This meant as much scratching into, rubbing out, scraping back, and starting over as it did applying oil paint in every conceivable manner and viscosity.

    Part 2:

    Woman with Bicycle
    (1952-1953), another painting at the retrospective is a monster of a painting with a formless piece of pure red pigment at the centre of the canvas. That mark gives the impression, say some critics, as if de Kooning had just about given-up on this new art form. Perhaps in the green square-shaped smudges and scrapes at the bottom of the painting de Kooning found himself, momentarily redeemed by the dialectic between form and anti-form, the simultaneous contrast between red and green.

    Perhaps the paint became, for de Kooning, a way of pinning down this figure to the picture-plane, literally a base on which to anchor the figure. Perhaps, too, the doubling of the teeth, lined-up above the formless piece of pure red pigment, and the resulting alignment along the central axis of the painting, was de Kooning mocking the seemingly irrational results of his enterprise. Form and anti-form may just be, in the end, a prison-house for de Kooning’s pictorial logic.

    Part 3:

    “Talent is a crushing burden, a curse, to the artist who would be modern, experimental, original, free,” wrote Rochelle Gurstein who reviewed this retrospective for The New Republic this month. “I couldn’t help feeling there was something tragic in the historical development that de Kooning represented”1 Gurstein wrote. What pressure was de Kooning under, with episodes of redemption, only to return to what must have felt to him like some kind of torture? Gurstein asked rhetorically.

    I had just started primary school at the time de Kooning did this work. My mother had just joined a new religion that had come into town, the Baha’i Faith; my father had got a job closer to the centre of town, a town in Ontario’s Golden Horseshoe. I knew nothing of de Kooning and abstract impressionism immersed as I was in the years of middle childhood according to human development psychologists.-Ron Price with thanks to 1Rochelle Gurstein, “Abstract Expressionism's Most Traditional Artist,” The New Republic, 2 February 2012---for much of the above.

    Part 4:

    What was his inspiration, his creativity,
    his intensity, capacity-extraordinaire as
    an action painter to make psychic event
    happen apparently spontaneously on his
    canvases just after history’s worst war?

    Was de Kooning’s apparent aim synthesis
    of tradition and modernism? Did that aim
    grant him more flexibility within the Late
    Cubist confines of its canon of design???

    The dream of a grand style hovers over all
    this: the dream of a clearly grand & heroic
    mix. He went so far as to draw with his left
    hand, with his eyes closed, watching TV &
    trying to get away, so I’m told, from talent.

    Is this the pathos of what it meant to be a
    modern artist of the ‘50s generation, a time
    when a new and thrilling motion seemed to
    be permeating the world of existence little
    did he or virtually anyone else even know
    back then in days when rock-‘n-roll was
    about to wake people up from the dream
    of Mr. Clean & Doris Day, General Ike &
    luxury without stress, & no Negroes, & no
    genitalia: please, not at all, pretty please!!2

    1 From essays on de Kooning by Harold Rosenberg and Clement Greenberg.
    2 The Fifties: The Way We Really Were, D.T. Miller & M. Nowak, Doubleday & Co., NY, 1977, p.302.

    Ron Price
    19/2/'12 to 25/8/'14.

    Last edited by RonPrice; August 24th, 2014 at 10:58 PM. Reason: to add some italics
    married for 47 years, a teacher for 32, a student for 18, a writer and editor for 15, and a Baha'i for 55(in 2014).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Newbury, UK
    Posts
    266
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 94 Times in 59 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    i'd love to see a big de Kooning show. don't know if there's been one in London any time recently.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    George Town Tasmania Australia
    Posts
    90
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Did You See?

    In September 2011 de Kooning's work, cro-magnon, was honored with a large-scale retrospective exhibition: de Kooning: A Retrospective September 18, 2011 – January 9, 2012 at MoMA in New York City. Organized by John Elderfield it was the first major museum exhibition devoted to the full breadth and depth of de Kooning's career, containing nearly 200 works. Did you hear about this cro-magnon?-Ron

    PS As you may know in
    November 2006, Kooning's Woman III was sold by David Geffen to Steven A. Cohen for $137.5 million, making it the second most expensive painting ever sold at that time.

    married for 47 years, a teacher for 32, a student for 18, a writer and editor for 15, and a Baha'i for 55(in 2014).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Members who have read this thread: 11

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook