Biggest rape of a book.
 
View testimonialsView Artwork
Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Biggest rape of a book.

    This is my humble attempt to bring the community together with a wacky conversation about something. So here it goes:

    Have you ever seen a movie that was originally based on a book that you loved? But then the movie took a poor approach to the book and ended up with something that was either lacking or just plain stupid? I know i have Biggest rape of a book.

    I will start the post by throwing in Rules of Attraction by Bret Easton Ellis. Even though the movie was not bad, it rushed and left many vital details out in the dark and made the characters relation in movie confusing because of loss ends that was not catched up with.

    Now you join! :chug:

    And all you can do is laugh
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Hillsborough, California
    Posts
    662
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Resident Evil

    ...

    The instruction manual?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    1,823
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The Thirteenth Warrior, based on Eaters of the Dead, by M Crichton. Sure the book wasn't stellar, but the movie sucked.


    Es fließt durch meine Venen, Es schläft in meinen Tränen
    Es läuft mir aus den Ohren, Herz und Nieren sind Motoren

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    582
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Yeah, I remembered watching The 13th Warrior till the end, and then wondering what the whole point was.

    ...+1 exp
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    cold wet pit of northern oblivion
    Posts
    2,654
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 92 Times in 92 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Another Crichton Timeline, the book wasn't bad but the film was a giant flying turd.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Doctor's office
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    yeah 13th warrior kinda suck.....its utterly impossible for someone to suddenly speak another language in 1 night.

    After all, dog is a dog. A duck is a duck. But a cat is a person.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,308 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Frank Herbert's Dune.

    Both the theatrical and SciFi channel versions suffered from severe creative, financial and acting neglect. I wish they had done nothing.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    in the GTA
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I thought he learned the language over a course of several nights shown by the drastic change in weather. Also I though the 13th warrior had some merit considering its lack of really big celebrities shows its smaller budget than most films. Since I've never read the book I suppose I have no idea what I'm talking about.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,308 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    For the most part, I think making adaptations from literature is very much an uphill battle. Movies have to deliver a fairly consistant flow of plot development in a very short ammount of time. They do this mostly at the expence of character development. With books, the pace can be whatever the auther thinks it should be too. Sometimes you really want a really good sense of a time span and rather than a simple little segway (5 years later or something), you stay with the character durring that time.

    The Lord of the Rings is a good example. In the book (after the lengthy prologue giving you a detailed history on hobbits), Frodo first meets gandalf for Bilbo's eleventy'first party which is also partly his as it's his 33'rd birthday. Gandalf tells him about the ring, blah blah blah, he has to leave the shire...So he builds himself a new house, sells Bagend, and doesn't even leave for Bree untill he's 50. Then he meets up with Tom Bombadil, the Barrow Wight, Farmer Maggot, etc. Eventually (miraculously) he gets there... Imagine the exodus of theater walkouts there would've been with our society's short attention span and a opening like that!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I hate to add another Crichton book but the movie version of Rising Sun was piss poor. They got rid of the underlying racial squabbles completely

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,308 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    On that note, The Lost World was also terrible while the book was very good. Movie studios just need to leave Crichton alone it seems.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    1,823
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Movie studios just need to leave Crichton alone it seems.
    No, I think they just need to put some damn effort into it. Its not like his books instantly make a good movie, but that is how they treat it, and don't give them any real thought. Crichton has good stories, but the films don't reflect that.


    Es fließt durch meine Venen, Es schläft in meinen Tränen
    Es läuft mir aus den Ohren, Herz und Nieren sind Motoren

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    934
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    You know what the one thing is I never really understood.

    Books from films.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    317
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    they do it to make money

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    sweden
    Posts
    834
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 87 Times in 22 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    comics from film


    comics to film that goes to comics again (like x-men the movie comic)

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  17. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    1,133
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Chrichton mostly rips off other books, so he deserves to get ripped ;-) The 13th warrior was based on Beowulf, an ancient anglo-saxon story.

    I vote for the Illiad, after having just seen Troy
    And for Lord of the Rings-Return of the King. That was pure evil.
    Of course Robin Hoodrince of Thieves and the Postman score pretty high too!

    Power is nothing without intelligence.

    Sketchbook!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  18. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    116
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    H.P Lovecraft, one author whos work has been butchered more often than not,
    can't mention any specific films because the attempts have been many.

    Those I've seen I don't remember much from except they weren't very good.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  19. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,308 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Who does Crichton rip off? I don't even see how Eaters of the Dead "rips off" Beowulf. Is it because they both have norse warriors or something? Other than that, I honestly can't see how one would draw that conclusion. they're completely different in everyway! His other works, Jurassic Park, The Lost World, Sphere, and Congo, were excellent original books. He's the only author that I can think of who can take a fantastic scenario and makes it seem plausible. I'm sorry but no one who's read Crichton would say that he's a rip-off.

    Everyone's entitled to their own oppinion unless they're bashing Crichton. Now look what you did! You got me all worked up!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  20. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    BATTLEFIELD EARTH!

    Now there's an epic book.

    Now there's a shitty ass movie.

    Disclosure. (Among all the other Chricton books already mentioned)

    ~.cfb, proud member of the Middle Class.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  21. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Posts
    1,133
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    heh Exo, okay you have a point.

    I just wrote that after seeing Troy, a movie i looked forward to and regretted seeing. Not the right mood for objective criticism ;-)

    I got to say that i really liked Sphere (the book). The Lost World however can't be an original story, since there is a really old black&white movie with the exact same story. Probably an even older book too then.

    Anyway, even if he does (occasionaly) integrate existing stories, he does write them with a real good flavour and he also writes damn good originals.

    I stick to my point about Beowulf though. It is a nice adaptation that places the myth in a more realistic setting that could be the origin. Except for the anachronistic Arab ;-)

    E.

    Power is nothing without intelligence.

    Sketchbook!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  22. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    2,963
    Thanks
    1,345
    Thanked 1,308 Times in 307 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The Lost World was a 19'th century book written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the guy who wrote Sherlock Holmes. In that story, explorers simply stuble on to a lost continent that has Dinosaurs. In Crichton's Jurassic Park sequel, it's about how, despite all of the genetically installed failsafes, the dinosaurs started to thrive and create their own equilibrium. The books are similar in that way as explorers are simply observing dinosaurs but one is given a very modern and scientific tone. And it revisits the whole "playing God" theme that the last book was centered on. And of course it wouldn't be Crichton if the dinosaurs didn't get pissed off and start killing people.

    What I love about those books is that it really is 100% observation and comentary of ethics within scientific practice. The movies, the last two anyway, lacked that dialogue almost completely.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  23. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    142
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Rant! Rant!

    The Musketeer! OMG, it was the worse film ever. It didn't even follow Dumas' classic tale. I love the Three Musketeers, it is one of my favorite books and to see it so... horrible like that, it almost made me want to cry. I like DISNEY'S version better then that one. *flop* It was all eye-candy, no story. They didn't even have one of the man baddies (Lady de Winter). *shakes her fist* I hate it when I wait for a movie and it turns out to be bad. Ugh!!!!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  24. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    173
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I haven't read many books, but I really agree with .cfb. Battlefield Earth is an awesome book, which glued me to the pages, the movie however, doesn't even make a good paper weight. They're hardly even the same story.

    stuff
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  25. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    duluth, mn
    Posts
    64
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Largely the reason why the theatrical Dune sucked.. is because its suppose to be about 12 hours long uncut, heh.

    Lynch had to trim it down to 2.5 hours. I duno how he thought it'd sell so long in the first place, but this is what I read in Franks bio, and told by his son in person..

    Still, why the hell did Muad'dib make rain in the end?? Why??? Frank Herbert was on set, howd he let that slip by!?

    Cant wait to see the sci-fi version of Emperor of Dune. ( )

    - loken
    jtriska @ mcleodusa.net
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook