Results 1 to 13 of 20
December 3rd, 2011 #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[ASK] Does this rumours is true...?
Hi, its been nice to join this great art society....Im such enthusiastic in the whole of art stuff...
There's rumours going around in my place, that :
If you wanna be a good draftsman / painter, you should do autopsy
What do you think ?
Hide this ad by registering as a memberDecember 3rd, 2011 #2
If you think you will be a good draftsman / painter by doing autopsy I would say you are so wrong. The only thing I can see that is good for, is that it might help your understanding of anatomy better. But then again, one thing understanding it, and its an other thing actually drawing it well enough for others to understand it. You wont automatically start drawing the human form better just because of an autopsy...
December 3rd, 2011 #3
December 3rd, 2011 #4
The Following User Says Thank You to Randis For This Useful Post:
December 3rd, 2011 #5As Leonardo became successful as an artist, he was given permission to dissect human corpses at the hospital Santa Maria Nuova in Florence. Later he dissected in Milan at the hospital Maggiore and in Rome at the hospital Santo Spirito (the first mainland Italian hospital). From 1510 to 1511 he collaborated in his studies with the doctor Marcantonio della Torre.
"Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
December 3rd, 2011 #6
December 3rd, 2011 #7
... or you can just buy pretty expensive but realistic anatomical model to keep on your desk.
December 3rd, 2011 #8
The actual act of dissecting a corpse is extremely difficult to undertake with the intention of learning anatomy for the sake of drawing. Yea you'll learn how to draw a dead, cut-up, body, but this is far from representative of a living specimen. Leonardo Da Vinci cut up his fair share of bodies and was a rather clever man yet he still managed to do some less than accurate anatomical drawings.
A good, up-to date book on anatomy will likely help you far more, with regard to developing drawing skills, than performing an autopsy will. Don't forget, books are effectively years and years of collective information and knowledge compiled and condensed. So unless you've got a lot of time and access to a very large quantity of willing corpses, you're better off setting aside the morbid fascination fueling that rumor and picking up a book.
The Following User Says Thank You to Smashed_Pumpkin For This Useful Post:
December 3rd, 2011 #9
I've seen a human autopsy, for my biology class - and let me tell you, it doesn't help in the slightest bit as far as learning the anatomy you need for drawing goes. You want to learn about musculature and how muscles flex and contract, you don't need to see human insides, trust me.
December 3rd, 2011 #10
I arranged to watch an autopsy before I went away to art school (the county coroner was a friend of my father's). Luckily for me, nobody died needing an autopsy in time -- the sort of thing a coroner does is extract organs and weigh them, examine stomach contents, things like that. It would have been an absolutely vile experience with no value to an artist whatever.
Now, the Body Worlds display was fascinating. Ethically a little dodgy, but great to stare at. I went with a nurse friend of mine.
I was once on the receiving end of a critique so savagely nasty, I marched straight out of class to the office and changed my major (sketchbook).
December 3rd, 2011 #11
Maybe if you plan to draw a lot of zombies.
Otherwise, not so much. If you think about it... a good artist draws many different kinds of things, not just human beings. So if you want to be a good artist do you also have to take cars apart? And houses? And dogs and cats and horses? What about if you want to be good at painting dragons, do you have to dissect dragons?
As soon as you start thinking about what a great artist must be able to draw you realize that there are many things that the artist can draw that they can never see the inside of, so seeing the inside of something is not required to draw it well.
December 3rd, 2011 #12
Autopsies are of no use whatsoever unless conducted in a stone castle and accompanied by organ music.
The truth will set you free,
but first it's gonna piss you off!
December 4th, 2011 #13
Once a year, I pour a couple of stiff drinks and read my Mom's autopsy report.
Me? I'm about as sentimental as an autopsy.
Really, I don't think the traditional necropsy would be all that useful for an artist. . .