Results 1 to 15 of 17
Thread: Obama Call for Artists
October 7th, 2011 #1
Obama Call for Artists
Just a heads up if anyone is interested in this. Ad popped on FB this afternoon. I won't be adding my 2 cents I have so much to do elsewhere, but I think I'd do a contemporary realism piece depicting an opium field with happy workers in the sun....
"Obama for America is seeking poster submissions from artists across the country illustrating why we support President Obama's plan to create jobs now, and why we'll re-elect him to continue fighting for jobs for the next four years.
Your poster can address the broader themes of the President's plan or pinpoint a specific aspect, from supporting small businesses to rebuilding roads and bridges for the 21st century. For more on the desired specs..."
Last edited by Izi; October 7th, 2011 at 05:02 PM.
Hide this ad by registering as a member
The Following User Says Thank You to Izi For This Useful Post:
October 7th, 2011 #2
Oh wow, that's a pretty big deal - thanks man (lady)!
October 7th, 2011 #3
...I'll support him once he gets rid of ObamaCare...My Sketchbook:
October 7th, 2011 #4
That says a few things. They're trying to recapture Fairy's iconic poster. Their expensive marketing team can't come up with anything. So what they'll do is put the call out to a bunch of people who will gladly give up their hard work for a smile and a hand-shake.
I know, I know. "But it'll be famous! Part of history! etc" Plenty of commissioned pieces are a part of history. But buying artwork isn't hip. It just doesn't have the right feel."Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
October 7th, 2011 #5
So, let me get this straight...
The Obama Administration wants a poster (which will presumably be seen by millions everywhere) to advertise President Obama's plan to create jobs as a part of his campaign for re-election but they don't wish to compensate (as in monetary payment) said artist for his/her hard work and effort (i.e. doing his/her job)? Now, can that be considered an "irony?"
Please, correct me if I'm wrong. I just didn't see anything about compensation for this other than an autographed print."Contrary to the belief of the layman, the essential of art is not to imitate nature, but under the guise of imitation to stir up excitement with pure plastic elements: measurements, directions, ornaments, lights, values, colors, substances, divided and organized according to the injunctions of natural laws. While so occupied, the artist never ceases to be subservient to nature, but instead of imitating the incidents in a paltry way, he imitates the laws."-Andre Lhote
Web, FineArt, Sketchbook
October 8th, 2011 #6
Well, a poster signed by the first black president would be worth ALOT even on the street right away. 20 years from now it would probably be priceless.
But I agree that it is tacky all around, still great publicity. Any artist would have it made with that kind of showing. (seen by millions is nothing to sneeze at)
October 8th, 2011 #7
October 9th, 2011 #8
Obama's signature is already going for $1300 on the low end so i guess the answer to that question is based on the artist's IQ, and publicity also has monetary value.
Even though I don't agree with many of Obama's choices, anything that pisses off the Nazis trying to take over our government, like supporting a black man in office, is fine with me. I don't buy into the idea that spec work hurts everybody. Competitions have been some of the most fun and engaging events in my life.
Last edited by Izi; October 9th, 2011 at 03:53 PM.
October 10th, 2011 #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Sacramento CA
- Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
What he isn't going those re-use the 1930's Hitler propaganda style posters again?(hey go compare get freaking history book made before 1980) We as Artist should be part of anything these Political BS in DC is pushing. None of them care about Us just for their jobs and the Money and power they steal from us.
October 10th, 2011 #10
October 10th, 2011 #11
Our tax system is a mess. I've been looking up numbers for another thread. How much tax is taken depends on what bracket you belong to. Plus different types of income are taxed differently. So earning a wage or salary means you're taxed differently than someone who lives off financial investments or selling property. Just looking at income, the most someone will be taxed is around. And once that's settled, there's a wacky formula used to calculate the final number.
A single person who earns $379,151 or more will have 35% of their salary eligible for taxation. That doesn't mean they will actually be taxed that much. It's just a starting point for that tax bracket. The real amount paid will depend on what I said above and what deductions the person can claim. The median income in the us for 2010 was between $49,000 and $50,000. The median income is often lower than the average, I can't find the average income level. But a person making that much would have 25% of their income be eligible for taxation.
I would consider $50,000 to range from comfortable to slightly-struggling, depending on what state you live in. Each state has different average incomes and different average living expenses. $50k is comfortable where I live but in NYC it may be hard to make ends meet with that. If I earned $379,151 a year, I would consider myself wealthy, even though I wouldn't be a millionaire or billionaire."Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
October 10th, 2011 #12Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Thanked 271 Times in 199 Posts
The Following User Says Thank You to Meloncov For This Useful Post:
October 10th, 2011 #13
The problem with political organizations is that it shows a disconnect with the people they're ironically trying to connect to. I think the message than an artist should get paid because they need jobs too is a very worthy cause as well. Obama and any politician often get money from their cause for lobbyists to support the cause. They're not an organization that need help in the sense, other organizations like the feeding the homeless, helping the disabled need.
Obama was originally a grass roots effort, his re-election is not.
Also oh fuck didn't see someone Darwin'd the thread :/
October 10th, 2011 #14
I still can't comprehend why people are backlashing against a medical system such as ours (Canadian). We are definitely happy with it over here, and wouldnt trade it for whatever gain there is in not being socialist.
Oh well, not my business, thats why I live in Canada, anyway. I presume the answer has to due with taxation raises, and perphaps middle class Americans are getting by paying for their own healthcare. oh well.
October 11th, 2011 #15
There are no members to list at the moment.
By urmb in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTERReplies: 5Last Post: May 12th, 2010, 01:24 PM
By merdi in forum ART COMMUNITY ACTIVITIESReplies: 0Last Post: May 31st, 2008, 06:09 AM
By ifmagazine in forum Artist LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: August 27th, 2005, 03:10 PM
By lasupaman in forum ARTISTS LOOKING FOR WORK!Replies: 0Last Post: April 3rd, 2004, 01:43 AM
Tags for this Thread