Modern Spacecraft concepts

Join 500,000+ Artists

Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Modern Spacecraft concepts

    Heres some ideas I have for some spacecraft designs.

    Tos tart this off, I've made a Sikorsky ATC-010 Attack Transport Craft, a craft used for transporting up to 12 units, plus 2 flight crew. Armed with light machine guns and two missile pods.

    The crew would enter/exit through the back airlock. with an emergency airlock on the side.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    that blob on the left was my side profile i used to define the general shape..and went perspective from there.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 27 Times in 26 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    could you make the right side a little lighter? it kind of blurrs in to the drop shadow

    It's the sketchbook.. I don't get the html stuff
    http://www.conceptart.org/forums/showthread.php?t=84000

    Download my Nintendo music remakes free on piratebay:
    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4546..._by___BitRobot

    vol.2:
    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4603..._by___BitRobot
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    2,710
    Thanks
    2,942
    Thanked 1,819 Times in 936 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Indeed, that shadow is overwhelming.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Done! That better?

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Noo Yawk
    Posts
    2,176
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 776 Times in 461 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Two observations: It appears that the tail fins are not on the same plane with each other. Secondly, how/where does it store its powerplant and troops? Am I correct to assume that "unit" means an individual infantryman?

    Although I must say, you've done an excellent job in translating the nose of the Sikorsky S-70.

    Amateur Artist. Professional Asshole.

    Lookit the Pretty!

    Rule #1 of depicting soldiers: KEEP THE DAMN FINGER OFF THE DAMN TRIGGER.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,540
    Thanks
    129
    Thanked 884 Times in 593 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Hey. I think the title of your post is giving me the most confusion. The word modern to me means that it could be developed and built today. Well, this craft would never escape our gravity given current technology.

    So either it is using super strong future engines, so it is a craft of the future. Or it is a craft of the skies, not space. And if it is a modern design for flight, then I don't see how it would do that either. But I'm no expert in ID.

    Whats the deal?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    5,234
    Thanks
    3,512
    Thanked 4,903 Times in 2,544 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Good effort - I love this kind of thing so would like to offer a few thoughts.

    Much better after getting rid of the heavy shadow.
    I assume this is a space and atmospheric transport? But if atmospheric how does it generate lift? Vectored thrust (like a Harrier VTOL), anti-grav tech (where are they?) or conventional wings?
    The windows indicate scale so I think you have too many for a two-person cockpit.
    Entering from the rear also looks like it would be a long ass walk up to the cockpit for the flight crew.
    Size wise it feels more like a transport for 40.
    The missile pods aren't symmetrical/in proper perspective.

    Basically I would do a redesign keeping in mind scale, dimensions, functionality of lift, powerplant, access, weapons, etc. Maybe work this one over as a larger transport and develop a smaller, lighter transport. Consider all three main views - front, side, top plus isometric/perspective. Right now it looks a little too much like a conventional large copter with rotors removed.

    Keep it up though, looking forward to any further work!

    What would Caravaggio do?
    _________________________

    Portfolio
    Plein Air
    Digital
    Still Life
    Sight Measuring
    Fundamentals
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Did a bit of an update to the concept, taking in mind some of the points you guys shared. I usually am very Industrial Design minded...so we'll see how realistic i can make this. I think once this 2d stage is complete, i'll make a basic 3d model...

    Also, added a little dude for scale. it's meant to be a small transport. A pilot, a copilot, and the rest of the crew is soldiers or personnel.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by flakmonkey; July 27th, 2011 at 05:52 AM. Reason: attachment fail
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    538
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 120 Times in 106 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Is this thing going to interact with the atmosphere at all or is it always goig to be in space? If it's the former, this thing will get WRECKED. If you look at our current spacecraft and spacePlanes you will see that these are very aerodynamic. This is not only to make it more efficient to get more speed, but also because more wind resistance=more friction=EVERYONE DYING IN A HORRIFIC FIREBALL!!! If this is going to be built in space and used only in space, you don't need that aerodynamic design.

    Function over form! Remember that!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I do agree with function over form.

    In this case..don't open those side hatches in space.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    oops. apparently you can see my outlines of a former engine concept. oh well. ill take it out next time. its time for sleep.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Cool lines; definitely looks military and believable. Some color in unexpected places would make it pop, I think; either something on their by the pilot, or maybe some brightly colored squadron markings. Up to you though.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Invertedvantage For This Useful Post:


  16. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    yeah, color is the next objective.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 121 Times in 86 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like this design. However, from the second I saw that you built it off of a grey blob, I knew that you were going to have lots of technical problems. Here's how you should be doing highly constructed industrial designs:

    http://conceptart.org/forums/showthread.php?t=126817

    If you look really carefully you can see that you're not QUITE aligning everything on the same planes. If you were to go through this tutorial with your spaceship, you'd have a good knowledge of where everything falls in relationship with each other and that'll help fix things like how the fuselage isn't perpendicular to the wings. Or how the wingtips are both tilting the same direction. Or how lots of the lines that define the plates on the body aren't parallel but slightly converging or diverging. Or how the connector between the hatch and the hatch...hole doesn't connect in the middle of the hatch. Snapping to a gird will fix all of that.

    The thing that bugs me a LOT more though is that huge blurry blobby black shadow. It actually hurts my eyes to look at your picture because they're constantly trying to refocus.

    http://conceptart.org/forums/showthread.php?t=121815

    Here's how to construct shadows. I also don't know what that cylinder thing is behind the back engine. It sorta looks like a Dalek that's playing hide and go seek with the spacecraft =P. And there are a couple of oddball lines under the engine on the right that make it look like the engine needs to shave.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Strato For This Useful Post:


  19. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    i accidentlly forgot to hid some of my other layers, thats the extra stuff youre seeing. lol

    thanks for the tips. I'm checking those tuts out.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  20. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    after studying that tutorial, i came up with this. now...it may just be me, but it feels off somehow...maybe it's all the round shapes.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  21. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    24
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    cleaning it up a bit..and changed the nose lines a bit. now they look better.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook