Results 235 to 247 of 252
Thread: Disney - Sexism and Animation
April 20th, 2011 #235
I'm the complete opposite though.. If I see someone fall. I will rush over to see if that person needs help. Probably because I would not expect anyone else to do so.. But I did once see a similar episode. An elderly woman fell on a loose tile. 4 people rushed to help her up and one went in the store and seemed angry as he talked to the personel. It's probably a rare thing, but it does happen.
If my friend is attacked at a bar I WOULD bite back, despite the agressor being huge, and although I don't personally expect much of people. I do expect my friends would do the same for me. Even my male friends.
Last edited by Lady Medusa; April 20th, 2011 at 03:11 AM. Reason: typo
Hide this ad by registering as a member
April 20th, 2011 #236
I actually don't know who you are, and this statement puzzles me. I spend most of my time at another forum where such topics would be met with a multitude of "Meh, interesting" or mild agreement or disagreement. We have manual registrations - signing up requires passing a psych/intelligence test with no questions - just a blank box of "tell us about yourself". People have been turned down for all kinds of weirdass reasons, but the forums themselves require no moderation at all - although occasionally some entertainment fodder is let in to heat the place up a bit. No opposition can be terribly boring.
My initial post was pretty nondescript, at the most I expected some defense of the Lion King. I thought it was pretty ironic the letter had Snow White on it. The recipient of the letter gave up art and animation forever according to her family.
Anyways the whole gender bias on protection bothers me. Women are very protective by nature, they have to be - they are troupe animals just like the others, and they carry the young. This is pretty much a given that they will be protective. *People* can and will help other *people* given a chance. It has little to do with sex, culture perhaps but not so in the US from my experience. Some men have bouts of solipsism - they like protecting females and being chivalrous, and automatically think females are the opposite - a receptive "lady" - sure - in China Yin and Yang are Feminine and Masculine, yet the third principle, Jen, the Man line is neither. *Man* is neither wholly masculine nor feminine, but a mixture of both. You can tend towards one end of the spectrum or another but it's still going to be a mix.
The same one which can be seen when a Bull Elk protects his cows? Or a female elephant protects her young from lions? It is the same instinct...not some weird expectation.
I've shot a female Elk...not sure where the Bull was but I could have shot him too. Anyways....crazy monkeys with guns are a totally different animal, with a completely different set of enviromental hazards.
Last edited by Izi; April 20th, 2011 at 05:20 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Izi For This Useful Post:
April 20th, 2011 #237
Last I checked they were treating Dinosauria as its own class. It would make sense to group them in some way but even I have a hard time wrapping my head around Triceratops and Ostriches sharing close family lines. Although I do seem to remember Triceratops and being bird-hipped...
April 20th, 2011 #238Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Thanked 5,197 Times in 1,728 Posts
"I'm the Queen Breeze in my Kingdom of Wind. I have a great treehouse in the clouds, where I'm an upstanding and important member, where I'm powerful and intelligent and I sit in there wasting time and feeling important. We have absolute power to deny membership based on completely arbitrary criteria. What a rush! Ah to be an elitist at my own power game created out of thin air, and you should come try to join so I can get a thrill up my arse being in a position to judge you. We do transmutational yoga and eat alchemy sandwiches and ride flying unicorns of esoteric freudian solipsism while googling anthropology. Whee! We're brainy as brainy can be, up in our imaginary treehouse in the clouds... where we'll live forever, eleven years old and immortal, dominating the universe without ever leaving our pyjamas!"
This has been a babelfish transliterational educational production.
At least Icarus tried!
My Process: Dead Rider Graphic Novel (Dark Horse Comics) plus oil paintings, pencils and other goodies:
My "Smilechild" Music. Plus a medley of Commercial Music Cues and a Folksy Jingle!:
April 20th, 2011 #239
April 20th, 2011 #240Blog Thing: http://www.velda.me/
Twitter Thing: @velderia
The Following User Says Thank You to velderia For This Useful Post:
April 20th, 2011 #241
That's my take on it anyway...though it is interesting that humans have had, and are able to develop significant diversity or variation in some domestic animals. Dogs for example...though they are still all the same species, not even sub-species yet. Recent genetics studies indicate that dogs have a very "slipper" set of genes within the genome that allows for this variability, something we've taken advantage of. Still, these variations of breeds do not change the deeper nature of the animal.
April 20th, 2011 #242
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
April 20th, 2011 #243
April 20th, 2011 #244
April 20th, 2011 #245
Sarskia, I did take a look at that article just now while I had a bit of time. It is really well done. Especially the part about the end no one else had mentioned in the articles I was examining, that the schizophrenic feel of Disney films is actually due to the creative process itself. Thank you for posting it.
One little thing I do have issue with is they mention Japan being historically more repressive to women than the West. I think it's worth it to know the importance of priestesses in Japanese both prehistorically and up until the Meiji period. The shaman-priestess of Japan seemed to be following the same rules of Shamanism the Chinese and Greeks were.
Considering the history of the Church in Europe, I would find it very hard to believe *Japan* who honors a sun goddess and who practices the sexual liberated rituals of classical Asian shamanism is more repressive than the Roman Catholic Church of virgin baby mommas who never have sex with women (St. Augustine even argued women have no soul) run by male priests, who also are not allowed to have sex, who also enjoy an occasional (female) witch roasting.
It´s good to make comparissons with movies that do it right, Christine Hoff Kraemer has written a nice essay comparing Nausicaä, Mononokehime, Pocahontas and Mulan ( can be read here : http://www.inhumandecency.org/christine/miyazaki.html ) where she points out the difference about how the characters are portrayed.
April 20th, 2011 #246
"Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
April 20th, 2011 #247
I suppose we could say the same about Obama before he got elected - he was a fantasy that could never live up to people's expectations - but that doesn't make the void Obama can't fill any less real. People's ideas about religion are so powerful they don't believe *Amaterasu* is "made up". So you are wrong on that count. However, we both know she really *is* made up. So look at why she was made up - the Japanese not only wanted, but needed a powerful, heavenly goddess who represented the most important object in their universe. That says a lot about their society. What Amaterasu represents is very real.
Denial of man's tedency to externalize internal subconscious feelings and collective feelings of a society is a retarded summation of what religion actually is.
Humans *are* what they put on altars, like it or not.