Art: Pirates!
Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 81

Thread: Pirates!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 138 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Pirates!

    Haven't posted here for quite a while. Here's some: The Gentle Ladies of Port Royale...

    the larger version, details and studies at: www.scrawnypaws.com

    Just an experiment in realism. I think it's overdone, but here it is, anyways.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  2. The Following 41 Users Say Thank You to scrawnypaws For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    2,157
    Thanks
    2,921
    Thanked 2,803 Times in 941 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    You did great job. I remember your works from cgsociety, how much photo ref did you use in this works and can we see some of them?

    Cheers

    M

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    canada, from russia
    Posts
    3,370
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 443 Times in 357 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    wow that is insane! you used photoshop or painter?
    Can we have a wallpaper sized version for our desktops?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    237
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 66 Times in 64 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    OMG!
    I've checked this on your website, and i have seen the half-size details... you are mad man.
    You are MAD and this is GREAT!
    Congratulations.

    My Sketchbook HERE
    My Blog HERE
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    vigostar's Avatar
    vigostar is offline Registered User Level 16 Gladiator: Spartacus' Retiarii
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    4,392
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 44 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    have always enjoyed your works.. Love the way you set-up the scene here... Thanks for sharing...

    Mainloop- man i must be dyslexic.. cuz i thought you asked how many people are on lsd

    SketchBook
    http://www.conceptart.org/forums/sho...d.php?t=237554
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Amazing stuff, Sasha!

    Volta | Blog | Facebook | Twitter
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 138 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    2 MatejaPetkovic
    i used to answer such questions, with step by step demos. it brought me nothing but grief, i'm afraid. i don't do this anymore. thanks for understanding.

    2 Pavel Sokolov
    the upload is limited to 537Kb and the image is too detail-intense to compress it more. i've a medium size (3072 px wide, the orinal is some 10K wide) version of it, too. but it can't be uploaded here.

    2 All
    thank you friends, you're too kind. Like i said, it's overdone. i also picked the most difficult kind of lighting to show off but got mired in detail without resolving critical issues first. fragment are ok, though. at least the technique is alright.

    still, CG is quite frustrating, in a way. this could have been done in oils with much less effort and with a higher degree of success. unfortunately, i've no place for my good old easel and paints where i live at present.

    i apologize for not being able to answer all your aimable comments and crits. Thank you.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to scrawnypaws For This Useful Post:


  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    How the Renfest went horribly wrong....

    You posted this for only one reason - to be told how brilliant it is, that you might walk away smugly. Well, it's brilliant, you smug bastard.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,068
    Thanks
    992
    Thanked 2,155 Times in 752 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    Looks really good. The foreground figure kinda bothers me, though... doesn't seem to fit into the scene.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    same thing is noah says .. the foreground figure bothers a lil .. expressions of all the figures are very nice .. i love the accommodation of pirates in the background .. all in all a brilliant detailed work .

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bandung, Indonesia.
    Posts
    1,158
    Thanks
    1,005
    Thanked 563 Times in 448 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Dammit. Perfect! You said overdone, but where?? but seriously, I hope you answered that, it's prob'ly my lack of knowledge, but I don't see where you overdone it. Keep it up, you!

    I'm making mess here: Sketchbook .
    also on dA and blogspot

    Cool people:
    Rotor | Kristoff | Kingkostas | Angel Intheuk | bbwolf
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Napa, CA (USA)
    Posts
    180
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 37 Times in 37 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MatejaPetkovic View Post
    You did great job. I remember your works from cgsociety, how much photo ref did you use in this works and can we see some of them?

    Cheers

    M
    I think it's safe to say he didn't do this entire thing from his imagination

    This is fucking INCREDIBLE and makes my head hurt just THINKING about attempting a painting like this. *shutters* I can't...

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    17
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I do not understand the controversy on the photos. What's the problem if an artist uses photographs as reference or not? What really matters is the final result. And the greatest proof that the difference is in the artist's hand, is that if we give the same picture to two artists, one with talent, and another one without it, the talented one will create a piece of art, and the mediocre will be limited to making a copy of poor quality.
    Sasha is really a master artist. I've never seen a better translation of an analogic technique into a digital one. The results speak for themselves.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  16. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    GENOVA/ITALY
    Posts
    857
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 287 Times in 222 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Wow! Stunning work!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sweden / Spain
    Posts
    375
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 98 Times in 65 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    crazy good work mate!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nigio View Post
    I do not understand the controversy on the photos. What's the problem if an artist uses photographs as reference or not? What really matters is the final result. And the greatest proof that the difference is in the artist's hand, is that if we give the same picture to two artists, one with talent, and another one without it, the talented one will create a piece of art, and the mediocre will be limited to making a copy of poor quality.
    Sasha is really a master artist. I've never seen a better translation of an analogic technique into a digital one. The results speak for themselves.
    If you use references your art can be great, but not you as an artist because everyone can paint like that! Would you understand the difference between the fact that he used photos and possibility that he painted this from mind? If an artist paint from mind, that means that he take next step after learning to copy a photo. And that is what artists should do, not staying in security of their current knowledge.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  19. #17
    vigostar's Avatar
    vigostar is offline Registered User Level 16 Gladiator: Spartacus' Retiarii
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    4,392
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 52 Times in 44 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Dude what are you talking about???? I would say about 95% of all the Master Painters used some sort of point of reference. The difference between a master and just a copier of a photograph is the ability to translate a 2D image to life. At the end of the day your imagination is going to lie to you but, a photograph is always accurate to the point of your translation that is.

    Mainloop- man i must be dyslexic.. cuz i thought you asked how many people are on lsd

    SketchBook
    http://www.conceptart.org/forums/sho...d.php?t=237554
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  20. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 138 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Hi all,
    thank you for kind words. For those interested in professional discussion, here it is:

    This is the most difficult type of lighting - 3/4 frontal with distinctive cast shadows. It sculpts form nicely and is probably the most handsome one. However, such lighting requires certain restraint. The image needs significant enough shaded areas to create balance between bright and dark zones. It should work almost like an abastract composition: dark and bright, tight and soft, vast and tiny. I didn't do a greyscale general sketch to solve that (kinda hoping my experience would sort it out by itself). This always leads to disaster, mark it. If you look at prelim studies, each fragment work fine. In fact, they are even better than the final image, because the yeye has no difficulty identifying what is primary and what is secondary. Some of vignettes and secondary figures should have been "toned down" to make the principals stand out. The background should have shaded areas to tie together the whole thing and provide more value variety for the eye. But once everything was in place, I didn't have strenght or courage to radically chnge what was necessary. So, it's an experiment that somewhat fell short of what it should have been. It was a good lesson, too, that one should always repeat to oneself - always solve basics first. That's why I say it's overdone. The image barely holds together.

    Now, educating someone who doesn't want to be educated is an ungrateful and hopeless task. Nevertheless, let's end once and for all that "from mind" nonsense, at least in this thread.

    The overall idea, the composition, the basic color and tonal palettes come "from mind". But "basic" is the key word. For those poor misleaded souls I say IT IS NOT POSSIBLE, hear it? NOT POSSIBLE to paint a PARTICULAR human form in directional lighting without a model. Even divine Michelangelo couldn't do it - he used multiple models and fused them into sublime beauty, but models he DID need.

    So, I've spent counless hours looking for fotos that had a figure, a detail, a head that matched - more or less - the idea. some were close, some weren't. The foreground head had a good experession but had a flat frontal lighting and from the wrong direction, too. I did my best to extrapolate, but there are limits... Just look at your hand in directional lighting! Turn it just one degree and everything is different, the outline, the muscle shape, all has changed! How one's mind can "figure out" this infinite richnes of form?!! What a silly notion!
    Now, I can raytrace by hand, like they did in the old days. If you give me front, side, top and precise sections every inch or couple of inches, I can construct a quite precise shading model, cast shadows and all. Even approximate the color bounce from experience. But who can provide such information? It's an immense task. It's absolutely prohibitive in ternms of time and effort. And it would still fall short of any study from a live model.
    And for those who don't understand words, just try something VERY simple. Paint a subject you're intimately familiar with. Something you've known for years, seen every day.
    Now, my "from mind" friends, please paint me your self-portrait. Head tilted 15 degrees to the right and 20degs back. The light source vector is (I'll make it REAL simple for you) is 45degs from right to left and 45 degs from top to bottom, just like in architectural renderings. Your viewing axis is tilted 5 degs to the right and 20 degs upward.
    Greyscale would be OK, just shading and cast shadows, alright?
    And please, NO MIRROR.
    Then we'll take a head shot of yours (to the secs) and compare the results.

    Go for it.

    I apologize if my manner is somewhat brash.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  21. The Following 38 Users Say Thank You to scrawnypaws For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  22. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Vienna
    Posts
    799
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 169 Times in 105 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    good lord!! This is absolutely stunning! Great stuff, mate..

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  23. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lisboa, Portugal
    Posts
    70
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    SHIT...THIS IS an OUTSTANDING WORK!!!!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  24. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    819
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 87 Times in 62 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by designer356 View Post
    If you use references your art can be great, but not you as an artist because everyone can paint like that! Would you understand the difference between the fact that he used photos and possibility that he painted this from mind? If an artist paint from mind, that means that he take next step after learning to copy a photo. And that is what artists should do, not staying in security of their current knowledge.
    You will NEVER learn HOW to paint unless you use reference. Too many artists nowadays are cocky and think that just because they have a great idea that they'll be able to execute. You can have the best idea in the world and it looks like complete crap on canvas because you didn't use photo reference to see what the colors and compositions look like in real life. Being able to paint from your mind is great. We're all artists and can do it. But keeping your skills sharp in order to continually do it is to use reference. Concept artists who have been in the industry for years may spend an entire day just gathering reference before starting a project.

    My SkEtChBoOk

    [URL="www.wftogame.com
    [/URL]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RoboBobo For This Useful Post:


  26. #22
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    489
    Thanks
    505
    Thanked 163 Times in 123 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I love your work sooo much! And I've learned so much from your posts on technique from a few years ago. Just wanted to thank you for all the knowledge and inspiration you've shared

    When in doubt, run and shout.

    Sketchbook Vol.2


    Sketchbook Vol.1


    Blog


    lys's sketchbook
    click there!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  27. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Great work!! I would have to agree on the statement that Noah made. The guy in the foreground bothers me a bit. Keep it up.. I don't think it's overdone!!

    If you don't know.......research !!
    http://mikeinscho.blogspot.com/
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  28. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    2,157
    Thanks
    2,921
    Thanked 2,803 Times in 941 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    @ scrawnypaws, i didn't wanna be rude by asking about refs, just wanted to see your method of painting, or better, how you make those collages in final composition.
    As i said in first thread i follow your work from 2006 and i like it very much.

    I also think it is not over done. Reminds me of a Russian realist school

    M

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to meth For This Useful Post:


  30. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    89
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 138 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    2 MatejaPetkovich

    i didn' take it as such, you weren't rude at all. i used to explain and show things, but it really doesn't pay off. that's the sad truth. people often say, "i wish i could do something like this" and ask to show them the "tricks". but their reaction is "oh, that's too much effort.", because there are no tricks.
    alright, i will try answering it. once i have the initial idea, i try to visualize it in my head , do some thumbs - 2-3 variations. but i don't commit because i can't be sure i'd have necessary material.
    i wish i was rich and could afford a studio, a stock of props and models that i could pose exactly as i see it in my head. Alas...
    so, i start looking for key characters (emotion, posture etc.). often it's impossible to find the right one and the figure has to be spliced out of 4-5 fragments. here's where you need to know anatomy and perspective to do it successfully. when i have all characters i make sure they all have consistent lighting and the horizon matches.
    there are many problems realted to the use of photos - again, i wish i could work with models, that would make many "fixes" unnecessary.
    first, the human eye "sees" differently than a cam. it's said that a 55mm lense is the closest one, but that's just an approximation. when you draw something your eye constantly changes viewing axis (and exposure) and your brain "assembly" it all into an image. the space depth is different, too. so, one has to adjust all these things.
    second, a photo has too many insignificant details. so i prefer to do it the old way: linear drawing/tracing, then monochrome underpainting, then color.
    this way i'm forced to understand the form and - simply because there's too much stuff - pick only those features/details that are absolutely necessary.
    so, i'd slap the comp together in greyscale, paint it over to solve light distribution (darks vs. brights.), then do a color thumb do solve the palette. that's about it. and of course, if one has specific costumes in mind, they need to be designed first, refs founds etc...
    there are no miracles, i'm afraid.
    thispic took seven weeks to complete (i was between gigs and i wanted so much to do this image). i work fast, but it's still 5-6 days per principal. girl's head alone took almost three days. No tell me, what production can afford to pay for it ?
    hope that helps. Thanks.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  31. The Following 29 Users Say Thank You to scrawnypaws For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  32. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bandung, Indonesia.
    Posts
    1,158
    Thanks
    1,005
    Thanked 563 Times in 448 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Scrawnypaws: I can understand now why you said it's overdone, but still I cannot see it It's still a perfect image for me. Off course you used photo-refs and off course there are still flaws, especially from your eyes as the creator (though I failed to see one, I feel that even the foreground figure is necessary to lead the viewer, the composition is masterfully crafted, imo). Hmm, you said you used to explain and show things, do you have a link to it? I just thought it's nice to see. Hope it's not asking too much

    I'm making mess here: Sketchbook .
    also on dA and blogspot

    Cool people:
    Rotor | Kristoff | Kingkostas | Angel Intheuk | bbwolf
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  33. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    75
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I have seen that before on your site,It is a masterpiece Sasha.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  34. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Montreal / Canada
    Posts
    417
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 175 Times in 98 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Hey guys, enough these discussions about using photo references, it's too boring at this moment, it was discussed so many times how it could be. To make a really good interpretation of a photo reference artist should be a really skillful guy, for sure. It's obvious.

    Sasha, man, it looks really great, maybe if you'd change the scale of a characters on foreground and in perspective you'll get it ideal. But in any case it's a great artwork, thanks for sharing here.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  35. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    713
    Thanks
    556
    Thanked 322 Times in 251 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  36. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,013
    Thanks
    432
    Thanked 703 Times in 290 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    amazing! "overdone" my ass, there's a great range of polish and painterly energy. bravo!


    my website
    -- playing: "Pikmin 3" and "World of Tanks"
    -- reading: "Death of the Liberal Class" -Chris Hedges


    O my soul, do not aspire to immortal life, but exhaust the limits of the possible. - Pindar
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Members who have read this thread: 3

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •