Darrel Tank method? - Page 3
Join Free Art WorkShopJoin Premium Art Workshop

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 61 to 77 of 77

Thread: Darrel Tank method?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    North'n Ironed
    Posts
    661
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 167 Times in 119 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Hello Darrel.

    My friend, why, why why.. would you want to impress the layman? Drawing.. the creation of art, the privilege of self expression, is for you, and no one else.
    So then what was all that talk about conveying messages and emotion? Conveying them to whom?

    I understand that you're probably making a distinction between 'expressing' (to others) and 'impressing', but it's not exactly coming across like that. Besides, I don't think there's too much wrong in wanting an occassional thumbs-up for a piece that you're pleased with or proud of.
    Especially if you're trying to flog it.

    ...which is only my opinion.
    Sketchbook Deviations
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Vermis For This Useful Post:


  3. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Haifa, Israel
    Posts
    3,836
    Thanks
    2,289
    Thanked 2,226 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    "inspiring them to be creative"

    Exactly. Copying photos is anything but creative.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Ypsilanti,MI,USA
    Posts
    649
    Thanks
    707
    Thanked 444 Times in 226 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Yes, the only one "creating" is Darrel Tank. Unfortunately what he's creating are "meat cameras".
    Look among the avatars at the top of the page for MindCandyMan, Dorian, and EranWebber for examples of rendering in the service of an artistic sensibility, instead of just for its own razzle-dazzle.

    "Three's so little room for error."--Elwell
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Cory Hinman For This Useful Post:


  6. #64
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cold north
    Posts
    1,511
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 699 Times in 166 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I still think there are some cool photorealistic artists out there but Darrel Tank isnt one them.

    James e Bama


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Wasker For This Useful Post:


  8. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Atlanta, Ga
    Posts
    71
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Wow!

    What an amazing hate thread. Can you slam any other artists?

    John Garrett
    Illustrator-in-training
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to vapsman88 For This Useful Post:


  10. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    WA State
    Posts
    2,364
    Thanks
    796
    Thanked 1,273 Times in 887 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by vapsman88 View Post
    Wow!

    What an amazing hate thread. Can you slam any other artists?
    I'll slam Damien Hirst!

    He's not really an artist-- he's more like an art-director-of-chopped-up-animals. . .

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Kamber Parrk For This Useful Post:


  12. #67
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #68
    Black Spot's Avatar
    Black Spot is offline Pew, Pew, Pew Level 17 Gladiator: Spartacus' Dimachaeri
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,681
    Thanks
    3,223
    Thanked 5,366 Times in 3,589 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    I think someone hasn't read the whole thread.


    I didn't think it was possible to be called an artist when you have nothing to say. It's like being a writer who publishes individual words as books and expects to be praised for it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. #69
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I actually have I just decided to add a few examples of people on deviantart whose photorealistic stuff is even better than in the examples given here IMO.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  15. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Haifa, Israel
    Posts
    3,836
    Thanks
    2,289
    Thanked 2,226 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    It is not really better, it is all very meticulous but brainless copies of the photos. Natashakinaru even copies lens distortion with the same mindless automatism as she does everything else.

    There is no art in these, just technical skill. Compare them to Bama's painting above: it interprets and exaggerates to create character, instead of copying. There is no character, or artistic style, in those copies, beyond what the photographer had done - just boring repetitiveness. The real artist, when there is any presence of an artist's eye in the work, is the photographer. Whoever copied the picture in pencil is just a copyist.

    I really wish now for someone to analyze what this technique of pencil copying does to values and texture, and create a Photoshop filter that would make any photo look the same. Perhaps then this kind of wasteful stupidity will not happen so often.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  16. #71
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    So there is this other girl and she posted some of her WIPs:

    http://tanyamusatenko.deviantart.com...F28663408&qo=8
    http://tanyamusatenko.deviantart.com...28663408&qo=41

    So does this show that she, in essence, works as a scanner+printer? I mean, JD Hillberry's method, for example, is quite different: it relies on understanding of forms and light\shadow etc (as far as I am concerned), he puts layer above the layer, and so it looks like he is actually drawing; whereas her work resembles mere scanning pixel after pixel for value and then reproducing it on the paper.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  17. #72
    Black Spot's Avatar
    Black Spot is offline Pew, Pew, Pew Level 17 Gladiator: Spartacus' Dimachaeri
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,681
    Thanks
    3,223
    Thanked 5,366 Times in 3,589 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0
    That is still a photocopy of a photo - nothing added or taken away. Fine for a study when learning to draw what you see, but nothing else.


    I didn't think it was possible to be called an artist when you have nothing to say. It's like being a writer who publishes individual words as books and expects to be praised for it.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    56
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I don't get it, whats the point in learning to draw if your going to copy a photo down to every last freckle, eyelash and pimple, Boooorrring!!! take away the photo, and then what are they going to do. Michelangelo's quick sketches and doodles have more feel, flow, vitality, life in them then all off these mindless photo rendering copyist could ever try to achieve.

    Oh well if there's a market for it, someones got to do it. I'll stick to trying to use my imagination.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  19. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    759
    Thanks
    656
    Thanked 367 Times in 244 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Really, before photography was invented hyper-realism was considered in a much better light. I think the problem most people have with it now is the "uncanny valley" issue. We find things that are so close to perfection unsettling because the imperfections are all we see and it is harder too know what is wrong with these kind of images... generating a sense of dislike. For most art there are cues that help us suspend our disbelief. Without these cues we find it harder to accept the implied reality.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  20. #75
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    You may be right. But, I think part of it, too, is the distinction between hyper-real and photo-real. Photos have their own inherent distortions, and translating those into a painting just gives you a hyper-realistic picture of a photograph, not of the photograph's subject. As opposed to something like the Bama picture above, or any Van Eyck painting, or the various insane tromp l'oeil genre paintings, which are hyper-realistic and hyper-detailed, but don't look like photos.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  21. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    56
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I don't have a problem with hyper realism, there are definitely awesome well rendered drawings out there, just look at the old Ateliers very well done drawings from life, even the Bargue cast drawings are awesomely rendered, but they never brought out the family photo album to draw, It's the flat image of the photo that just makes the drawing look ahhhhhh flat, like the images that maxpancho posted well rendered but oh so boring even kind of creepy.

    I use photo ref all the time but I do try to interpret my own way.

    Edit: heres some of my drawings from photo ref, HERE of course I want to get way, way better then this in the future, dear I say it, draw even closer to the photo ref lol, but I do believe less detail adds to the drawing more then an over rendered photocopy drawing will ever do.

    Last edited by halfdolla; January 6th, 2014 at 06:03 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  22. #77
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I might be a little late on this thread so please excuse my tardiness BUT I have been discussing this at length with a friend of mine and I'd like to weigh in a bit. I was initially impressed with Mr. Tank. After a little while the amazement of his work wore off and I moved on to other artistic interests. I have seen how he accomplishes his pictures and although rendered very well his method to me feels a bit sterile and mathematical. I think his work appeals to the general masses who don't have an interest in the actual art of artistic expression they just like pictures. Theres a quote I read when I first was learning guitar and I think it's somewhat applicable here "The only people who care WHAT you play are musicians,everybody else just wants to hear music...."

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Members who have read this thread: 88

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •