"Researcher Decodes Rembrandt's 'Magic'"

View testimonialsView Artwork
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    2,068
    Thanks
    992
    Thanked 2,166 Times in 753 Posts
    Follows
    1
    Following
    0

    "Researcher Decodes Rembrandt's 'Magic'"

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0528092019.htm

    The title is a tad over-the-top, but it's interesting to see scientists confirming something we as artists all take for granted. That is, using lost and found edges to lead the eye.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Noah Bradley For This Useful Post:


  4. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,091
    Thanks
    1,795
    Thanked 1,557 Times in 608 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Didn't James Gurney talk about something like this?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    171
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 62 Times in 39 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    that site totally needs to be redesigned; it doesn't look trustworthy at all

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanks
    2,126
    Thanked 1,004 Times in 654 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    A University of British Columbia researcher has uncovered what makes Rembrandt's masterful portraits so appealing...
    ... "The transition from sharp to blurry edges, known as 'lost and found edges,' also directed the viewers eyes around the portrait in a sort of narrative."
    Listen.





    That's the sound of painters around the world facepalming.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to HunterKiller_ For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    542
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 207 Times in 103 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Next week they'll discover Rembrandt didn't actually use real human skin for his portraits, but oil paint. Can you believe that?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Adam Nowak For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    187
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 67 Times in 63 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    It is a little obvious to us as artists, but I still think it's cool that they replicated the effect and tracked eye movement to test it. Another of James Gurney's posts show that our notions of how the eye moves through a painting aren't always correct, so it's rather neat to have the scientific data to back up this particular technique.

    *adjusts monocle*

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 1

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook