Results 1 to 13 of 144
March 1st, 2010 #1
Planned Parenthood= Evil Eugenics Disguise
I know this is an art forum but feel this is an important issue that people need to be aware of. This information is sourced from http://blackgenocide.org where you can find out more.
The issue of abortion goes beyond a moral debate but has extreme health risks and hugely increases risks of cancer, mainly breast and cervical.
The unnatural process of abortion upsets the human bodies hormonal balance and the body does not realise the baby has been removed. Abortion clinics are also targeted to specific locations where there are the people groups of their rascist intentions, eugenics.
Sourced from blackgenocide.org:
Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in America. 78% of their clinics are in minority communities. Blacks make up 12% of the population, but 35% of the abortions in America. Are we being targeted? Isn't that genocide? We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population. If the current trend continues, by 2038 the black vote will be insignificant. Did you know that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a devout racist who created the Negro Project designed to sterilize unknowing black women and others she deemed as undesirables of society? The founder of Planned Parenthood said, "Colored people are like human weeds and are to be exterminated." Is her vision being fulfilled today?
more info at http://blackgenocide.org/planned.html
This is just the tip of the iceberg...
Last edited by Elwell; March 1st, 2010 at 09:30 PM. Reason: added Politics tag
Hide this ad by registering as a member
March 1st, 2010 #2
I'm afraid you just stepped on a land mine. Good luck with this one. I personally thank planned parenthood for all the free condoms that got me through high school. One girlfriend I had got knocked up with the next guy she shacked up with. I had to thank my lucky condoms because I would have had to raise a child with that crazy ho.
Last edited by Raoul Duke; March 1st, 2010 at 06:37 PM.
March 1st, 2010 #3
March 1st, 2010 #4
March 1st, 2010 #5
Euthanasia and abortion are really one of those 'case by case' issues. It is nearly impossible to generalize without 'short-changing' alot of people.
Eugenics is a fundamentally callous idea in its theory. In practice it is brutally inhumane.
We are the only minority in America that is on the decline in population
Last edited by karma militia; March 1st, 2010 at 07:13 PM.Pssst... I has sketchbook
The Following User Says Thank You to karma militia For This Useful Post:
March 1st, 2010 #6Procrastinator
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- New York
- Thanked 759 Times in 157 Posts
How is it genocide if it's voluntary?
The Following User Says Thank You to hippl5 For This Useful Post:
March 1st, 2010 #7
Yes abortion has extreme health risks. The issue is not so much about anti-choice. It's that those who have to make the big decision aren't provided with the full awareness of the major health risks associated with abortion, and also the fact that many people would be willing to adopt the child rather than see it aborted.
Marketing is about targeting a certain demographic, so it is genocide in the sense that the majority of abortion clinics are strategically located in areas of concentrations of minority groups.
There is much more information out there and links can be found in the first post if this topic interests you. I was made aware of this issue today so I'm sure there's alot more info out there for you guys to dig up.
March 1st, 2010 #8
Ok, can't bite my tongue.
1. I would like to see the proof that it increases the risk of cancers and the like. A link to an extremist viewpoint, I don't find to be valid.
2. The body does realize the baby has been removed. So again, I'd like to see proof of how it would not realize it. When the fetus has been removed, the hormones apparently regulate within a week. There are miscarriages all the time in early term pregnancy, so does the body not know the miscarriages happen either?
3. Does it not occur to you that the reason they are in the areas is because of demand for such services in those areas? It's the whole supply and demand thing. If there is a need it needs to be fulfilled. I'm not going to state reasons why there would be a need in those areas, but I'm sure if you looked it up you could find some. And I'd also be interested in seeing proof that 78% of all oftheir clinics are in "minority areas". What if they are in poorer areas, is that like them trying to get rid of the poor?
I'm not saying I'm for or against abortion. But citing a single source, and that source being an extremist viewpoint is not cool. People should be given the choice. It's their bodies, not yours. And abortion is not mandatory. So if they are voluntarily going and getting abortions how is this eugenics? How is it genocide? If they were forcibly sterilized, that would be different. But they are not being sterilized and they are not being forced to get abortions.
March 1st, 2010 #9
March 1st, 2010 #10
I found this link had some good information on the risks
Although the mothers are not being sterilised, abortion does damage the reproductive organs, so would damage future pregnancy.
The body is aware of natural miscarriage, because it's natural. In the case of unnatural miscarriage, abortion, The body takes a relatively long time to realise and make the appropriate hormonal changes to take effect.
Education and social work would need to be addressed more so than abortion clinics in those areas.
Last edited by Cam Sykes; March 1st, 2010 at 07:38 PM.
March 1st, 2010 #11
hey buddy, if you want to make a point and are doing it through citing sources, then you might want to actually find reputable sources so you're not laughed at.
It would be like me arguing that whites are the superior race and then citing the KKK website as my source.
March 1st, 2010 #12
March 1st, 2010 #13
Ok, first rule. The youtube, its not science.
second, the cancer thing is inconclusive, there nothing close to a scientific concensus on it.
illegal abortions are dangerous, legal abortions are not. Finding actual numbers on this is not rocket science. Abortions do not qualify to "extreme health risks" by a longshot. In fact, the whole argument is ironic since its the illegal abortions that are a health risk, especially in developing countries, where people are, you guessed it, often of a darker complexion. Those are your two options, legal, or illegal. Contrary to what antichoicers like to believe, the choice isnt abortions or no abortions. its legal, or illegal abortions.
Again though, playing the race card and calling racism on people who are pro choice? Brilliant tactic, especially in the US. Might bite them in the ass eventually.