Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 51 of 51
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Thanked 75 Times in 54 Posts
    Oh, shoot! I'm sorry! For whatever reason I thought it popped up as current, but maybe I followed a link instead.

  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Thanked 528 Times in 305 Posts
    How do people find these threads, anyway?
    *** Sketchbook and other stuff ***

    Flashback's SB

    Anatomy Atlas

    Digital Galleries

    Visit & Support:

  4. #33
    Ilaekae's Avatar
    Ilaekae is offline P.O.W.! Leader, Complete Idiot, Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Southwestern Pennsylvania
    Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,789 Posts
    How do I put this...? Uuuummmmmmmmm... I know!

    This thread is here and not on page 8,943 because SoooOOOOOoooome PEOPLE DO WHAT THE FUCK WE TELL THEM TO! SO...don't apologize, Julie G...

    Instead of asking the same g'damn question over and over and over, they use the search function or just cruise through old threads that are ABOUT SOME ASPECT OF ART!

    Art! Remember that thing that we all argue about, dissect, distill, study and piss and moan about? I hate REHASHING SHIT that has already been well-discussed, especially something important. Add to it, DON'T fuckin' replace it with all new shit that may not be as concise or contain information that came from people who are no longer here but actually knew what they were talking about in a discussion of a tiny part of the specialized world we live in...


    [gk ] Rant ended [/gk ]>>>>RETURN to normal status...
    No position or belief, whether religious, political or social, is valid if one has to lie to support it.--Alj Mary

    Ironically, the concept of SIMPLICITY is most often misunderstood by simple-minded people. --Alj Mary

  5. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Ilaekae For This Useful Post:

  6. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Thanked 1,780 Times in 850 Posts
    His books on anatomy have anatomical problems. I've seen him make matters more complicated then they need to be. I wouldn't call him a hack I just think there are much better books out there. He is over represnted on bookshelves.

    I also knew somebody that studied under him at art center and apparently he was abusive to his students. So there may be a vendeta against him as well. But it's just based on second hand information. So I would take that with a grain of salt.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Raoul Duke For This Useful Post:

  8. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Ottawa, Canada
    Thanked 1,197 Times in 870 Posts
    Burne Hogarth ran over my dog!
    The Nezumi Works Sketchbook - Now in progress

    My online portfolio

    Bloggity blog

    "Skill is the result of trying again and again, applying our ability and proving our knowledge as we gain it. Let us get used to throwing away the unsuccessful effort and doing the job over. Let us consider obstacles as something to be expected in any endeavor; then they won't seem quite so insurmountable or so defeating." - Andrew Loomis

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Nezumi Works For This Useful Post:

  10. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    WA State
    Thanked 1,272 Times in 887 Posts
    I'm pretty sure he was one of those jerks who take up two parking spaces.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Kamber Parrk For This Useful Post:

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Thanked 1,780 Times in 850 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamber Parrk View Post
    I'm pretty sure he was one of those jerks who take up two parking spaces.
    He had to vear into the other space to hit Nezumi's dog.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Raoul Duke For This Useful Post:

  14. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Torrance, CA
    Thanked 4,262 Times in 2,074 Posts
    It's a good necro so don't worry about it. If it was some god damn "what is art" thread from 3 years ago I think you may need to run

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Arshes Nei For This Useful Post:

  16. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Thanked 5,191 Times in 1,728 Posts
    Hogarth's memory of and interest in his own concepts is stronger than his memory of what reality actually looks and feels like.

    Thus his concepts are over-rationalized and under-researched. This is the source of their awkward, stylized stiffness. His work lost touch with reality and real experience of life years and years ago.

    That he is/was such a willful didact of his awkward concepts, makes him the archetype of the irritating control-freak pop intellectual who is more interested in getting his ego stroked by being considered an intellectual and "right", than by doing decent work. I'm sure he won every argument he was ever in with artists more talented and accomplished than he was.

    Gary Groth: ... Burne Hogarth.

    Frazetta: Yeah, well, that guy can talk!

    Gary Groth [Laughs.] He’s sort of to talking what you are to painting.

    Frazetta: Oh. I like that — he’s a masterful talker. Where does he get the energy?

    Gary Groth: I don’t know. I talk to him once every couple of months and he never slows down. It’s like he’s constantly on speed or something.


    Gary Groth: What did you think of Hogarth’s Tarzan?

    Frazetta: Well, Hogie started out emulating Foster, and it looked pretty darn good. But then he just went into his own realm [laughter], and became Hogarth. What can I say? Powerful and dramatic, but he tended to get carried away. It’s that same old thing, you know. They get hung up on something. Most of the time it’s the wrong thing. It’s like good movies. Some people focus on special effects, and there’s no storyline. Others have a thing about close-ups or sex, and it’s just one thing. And they don’t really expand on it!
    At least Icarus tried!

    My Process: Dead Rider Graphic Novel (Dark Horse Comics) plus oil paintings, pencils and other goodies:

    My "Smilechild" Music. Plus a medley of Commercial Music Cues and a Folksy Jingle!:

  17. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to kev ferrara For This Useful Post:

  18. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Thanked 19 Times in 13 Posts
    I dont like hogarts way of not really emphasizing bones and insertions of muscles on the dynamic anatomy book. Also there are not really that much explanatory images like on Bammes book. He is very keen on the shape of body, without schematicaly explaining what makes the shape of the body. However the shape of the body is something that people are going to use in the end, when they draw figure. Since you are not supposed just to draw plain bones and muscles. That stuff is just kind of preliminary for the nude, or maybe eaven clothed figure.

    Also the way he and also Bammes uses lighting to explain form, isnt something that anyone should mimic. It would be better to use one light scource and little reflective light, or two light scources. Because in the end people who are trying to understand human body are usually trying to do somekind of finished product (traditional painting, comicbook page, character design etc.) after they have done perioid of anatomy study. So it would be better to use the traditional way of lighting, since most of the folks that are going trough the books, are going to have to learn about the way light hits form anyways. To give kind of taste of what a finished drawing is supposed to look like.
    Sorry for my poor english
    My life drawings

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kai H For This Useful Post:

  20. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Thanked 98 Times in 49 Posts
    I hate Burne Hogarth for the phrase "bulging belly box."

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Ashtonw For This Useful Post:

  22. #42
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    I tried one of his books. Sure they had pretty pictures, but as the newbie I am they were completely useless. I literally learned nothing.

    Loomis at least helped me to see tht I lacked a lot of basic knowoledge. But his books tend to promise you something it's not a realistic espectation. His unrealistic proportions didn't help matters.

    A newbie like me doesn't get anything from them nd for advanced artist I am sure there are better stuff for them like loomis

    At least that was my experience.
    Last edited by FallenLegend; August 20th, 2011 at 11:13 PM.
    Check out my NEW NEW NEW SKETCH BOOK and my Constantly updated deviant art too! (Don't forget to critique both! I am very eager to learn)

    "There is a right way and an easy way". I am here to do things the right way .

    Philippians 4:13
    I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me

  23. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    San Francisco
    Thanked 759 Times in 489 Posts
    Hogarth just draws fake. The advice that "if it works for you then it's okay" is fake. There are too many pop anatomy books and pop drawing books that it's really a waste of time to bother looking through them even if it's for free, actually it's not free because you are paying with your life. You can get better at drawing by drawing anything, but you can draw your best only by drawing from the best sources.

  24. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    South Africa
    Thanked 692 Times in 419 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by legendarysonofgod View Post
    I tried one of his books. Sure they had pretty pictures, but as the newbie I am they were completely useless. I literally learned nothing.
    It was the same with me: I was (and am) quite in awe of his work, but couldn't for the life of me work out what he was on about or how to use the book to improve my own.

    I think the problem is that lots of instructional books get written by people who are either so spectacularly talented, or have become so accomplished at what they do, that they either never knew or have forgotten the things that beginners struggle with. They then write books that are wondrously beautiful to look through but of no real use.

    Beginners, on the other hand, work through Betty Edwards' books and then become convinced that the secret is to find the right book, that will magically solve all their problems.

    I have become very skeptical of the ability of any one book to teach me all that much or generate artistic breakthroughs. In my (admittedly rather limited) personal experience, nothing beats simply sketching anything and everything from life, and to some extent from reference photos and master art works. You have to build up a bit of a personal vocabulary of forms before the instructional books begin to help you.
    My sketchbook thread:

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to blogmatix For This Useful Post:

  26. #45
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    i studied from both dynamic figure drawing and dynamic anatomy when i first started learning years ago. as a beginner who knew jack shit about drawing both books had a profound affect on me...dynamic figure drawing in particular. as time went on, i got what i needed from both of them and moved on...havent referenced them in years. i'd still recommend dynamic figure drawing to someone starting out.

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to danny4 For This Useful Post:

  28. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    good question
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    My first book was dynamic anatomy. It was complicated and way technical in it's explaining, but i've always had a short attention span, so i just thought it was my fault and tried to digest it anyway.

    I still use his studies on hands, head, and specially his book on dynamic wrinkles and drapery as reference. Even if i don't get most of it (and i try, it just doesn't stick), i try to analyse the drawings as best i can, and it helps.

    Still, it wasn't until right now that i've read about this. You mean i could've made it easier on myself this whole time?

  29. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Thanked 538 Times in 296 Posts
    Like mentioned, it's a good necro. Better to necro this thread than start a new one.

    Anyhow yeah Hogarth's work is a bit... removed. The general concepts of construction, in that one might "build" a figure piece by piece, is decent but otherwise there's little of value. I've got two of his books, haven't even looked at them in years now. That in itself says something, especially when I've still got Bridgman's sitting out at this very moment.
    -My work can be found at my local directory thread.

  30. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Thanked 121 Times in 71 Posts
    This is Hogarth's son:

    Personally, I don't think Burne was that great of an instructor......kev ferrara pointed out he was grandiose and nuts.
    And the above link pretty much proves it.
    Last edited by NoSeRider; September 22nd, 2011 at 03:49 PM.
    My New Neglected Sketchbook
    You Ain't no Nina!.....

    "Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy
    "My mind is made up. Don't confuse it with facts." -- Terence McKenna

  31. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I've started studying a Hogarth book (Drawing the Human Head) on a hunch. Drawing from the images is fun and it's helping the eye in my brain, but some of his instructions are kinda retarded. He doesn't follow his own rules. For example:

    Name:  CA 04 13 2018 fuckery.jpg
Views: 94
Size:  322.2 KB

  32. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Toronto, Ontario
    Thanked 1,167 Times in 923 Posts
    If you find this confusing, use the Loomis head construction...
    Grinnikend door het leven...

    Sketchbook Blog

  33. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Thanked 312 Times in 270 Posts
    Proko has quick summary of basic Loomis head construction as well basic structure of face but its Head and hands is worth to read

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to stonec For This Useful Post:

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: July 12th, 2010, 11:28 AM
  2. Hogarth Study
    By Famine- in forum Art Critique Center
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 20th, 2009, 03:38 PM
  3. Burne Hogarth Books
    By JParrilla in forum Art Discussions
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: May 11th, 2009, 10:32 PM
  4. Art: Muscle Structure - Following Burne Hogarths: Dynamic Anatomy
    By resonance in forum 3D Art, Sculpture & Toy Art
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: September 13th, 2005, 08:13 AM
  5. Hogarth
    By nil in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: September 21st, 2002, 07:50 PM

Members who have read this thread: 34

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast