Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Beginning Entry: 2.64 MB of imagery

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    762
    Thanks
    988
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts

    Lightbulb Beginning Entry: 2.64 MB of imagery

    Okay.
    fistly i would like to say hello to all the artists who have decided to take a gander at my Newborn WIP, and to say a preemptive thanks to those willing to give any Critiques to help me improve the Piece.

    So this is my Entry i have been working pretty solid on for a while now.
    But things keep bugging me about it, there seems to be very little or no depth, and there seems to be problems with focal points and areas in which to interest the viewer's eye.

    i have an irking problem with the central figure, the anatomy of the shoulders and chest area seems slightly off, and the mass of the figure does not seem to "move in a way that seems "right".

    i may have re-shuffle the composition in order to get something better but i wanted to get the opinion of you fine folks at CA first just to see what others think what could be done.

    But enough of my Rambling, please----what do YOU think?


    From Start 'til Now:
    Attachment 710499

    Attachment 710500

    Attachment 710502

    Attachment 710503

    Attachment 710505

    Attachment 710507

    Attachment 710509

    Attachment 710511

    Attachment 710513

    Attachment 710515

    Attachment 710516

    Attachment 710518

    Attachment 710521

    Attachment 710524

    Attachment 710525

    Attachment 710527
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,537
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 1,855 Times in 601 Posts
    The figure looks too bright, so much so the details are becoming lost. The figure does need to be the focus but that doesn't mean it all needs to be so overpowering. I like the values of the head and "hair" in #8, although you still need to tone down the body and TV. Maybe make the screen bigger, having it stretch as he pushes through it. Make him transparent but clearly defined, like a ghost.

    Some of his glow could reflect - subtly! - on the ground and little people, and the TV frame, and the rest of the scene would fade off into darkness. The people could have shadows indicating he is the light source. ATM the shadows in the background don't really match anything.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    821
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 142 Times in 115 Posts
    I agree with Baron, your figure is losing a lot of detail, and the colors that end up in his shadowed areas look like they've gone negative. You had some nice detail in the muscles but that is all gone now. Also I'd think more about your composition. Its very flat and straight on right now, and when theres no perspective in a picture it can get boring. I like your first thumbnail, it looks like you were going for that when you first started. You also have way too much negative space everywhere. You might be planning on using it, but if not, you should think about changing it up. Also, be careful that you dont start just slapping color everywhere. Think about what you want the piece to say, the mood you want to convey. Is this a happy inspirational piece? Or is this thing emerging and taking over? Are you bleeding color into the world? On the surface its easy to see what your idea is, but you should go deeper. Keep going! Its a great start!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    At the dorms at SCAD
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    And I concur with the others. The colors are way too distracting because they are so saturated. I almost like the black and white version better - it almost gives a sense of something more mechanical - at least to me. But also lessening the saturation and making the figure more transparent may also help for him to not overpower the composition. ^^
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    So it's a guy coming out of a TV? I'm not getting much of a maternal connection between the guy and the TV in your composition. I would thumbnail out some other ideas before putting in as much time as you have with the rendering and the color.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bombay-India
    Posts
    166
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    ummm......very andrew jones-y...................the colors are very saturated n dont look cohesive... great idea tho.... keep going... its a great start!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Similar Threads

  1. What is so alluring about dark imagery?
    By Chris Saksida in forum ART DlSCUSSION
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: May 13th, 2010, 06:41 PM
  2. TED's Awesome Imagery
    By Zaxser in forum Artist Lounge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 25th, 2009, 11:12 AM
  3. bland imagery.
    By jgc in forum ART CRITIQUE CENTER
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 10th, 2009, 03:24 PM
  4. DSG 731: Storybook Imagery: THE BOY WHO TRIED TO BE A BOT
    By William b. Hand in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: April 28th, 2005, 02:28 AM
  5. Eye Of Science - Microsopic Imagery
    By Blind in forum REFERENCES & INSPIRATIONS
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 31st, 2004, 09:25 AM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook