Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SWE
    Posts
    2,536
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 1,309 Times in 389 Posts

    Speculars, radiosity, etc.

    I'm slowly slowly reworking my tutorial. Here's some 'illustrations' (eherrm) mainly on skintones (as I like them). There's gonna be some text to go along with it too, but perhaps it's pretty self explainatory?

    Speculars, radiosity, etc.

    [edit]image broken, please view prom's website @ http://www.itchstudios.com/psg/art_tut.htm[/edit]
    Last edited by davi; August 10th, 2007 at 08:56 AM.
    Jamen jag tror att han skäms, och har gömt sig. Vårt universum det är en av dom otaliga spermasatser som Herren i sin självhärliga ensamhet har runkat fram för å besudla intet.


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Prometheus|ANJ For This Useful Post:


  4. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    454
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
    This is very neat! I've never seen an expalination/ description of these aspects of color. I'm really excited to see the whole thing when it's done. Most of it does seem well explained already, though some of the writing is rough to read.

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 11 Times in 5 Posts
    Thanks for the tutorials, very helpful! I like the one in your sig too. Hopefully we will see more tutorials from you!

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Santa Rosa/San Anselmo, Calif.
    Posts
    3,391
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 418 Times in 161 Posts
    real nice tutorial!

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    10,007,461
    Thanks
    332
    Thanked 1,215 Times in 254 Posts
    way to go prom :]
    you should include a reference for people to try to paint and learn from. It's really hard for someone to learn these tips without absolute focus on them.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    bavaria, germany
    Posts
    874
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    hey, is this for the tutorial in the works you told me about in irc?

    that's going to be really great, judging from what you get across with just a few illos.

    thanks man, for all the work you put into this

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SWE
    Posts
    2,536
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 1,309 Times in 389 Posts
    Yeah I should snap some photos I guess. I dun wanna violate any copyrights. I could provide just urls though.
    Jamen jag tror att han skäms, och har gömt sig. Vårt universum det är en av dom otaliga spermasatser som Herren i sin självhärliga ensamhet har runkat fram för å besudla intet.

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA.
    Posts
    451
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 29 Times in 12 Posts
    cool prom, thanks.
    one crit tho would have to be "the eye has a very limited value range" its actually the other way around, our mediums (or media) have a very limited value range, and cannot produce exactly what the eyes see, that's why its usually split up into ten or less. etc etc etc etc etc..

    anyway, good job, its very simple and colorful!

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    bavaria, germany
    Posts
    874
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    stephen: i think what prom is referring to is the kind of "auto-calibration" the human eye has, always picking a spectrum width that provides the best level of information.

    if you are focussing on seeing detail in the sky (in proms small example), you will see brightly lit clouds, you'll roughly see where the sun is located etcetera... but you won't notice any detail of the tree, since its values are a good bit too low for the chosen calibration. if you focus on the tree, you'll lose detail of the sky, as the whole sky is a good bit too bright for values that fit into the value spectrum of the tree.

    basically, this is a mind thing, not an eye thing.

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SWE
    Posts
    2,536
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 1,309 Times in 389 Posts
    Yeah, the brain does a lot of things with the image from the eyes before our 'awareness' recieves it.
    It sets white balance by using surfaces that are assumed to be white. It sets exposure levels for individual objects, producing a false image with local colors and values everywhere. It also unwraps planes and surfaces in pespective, making them flat.
    This makes it difficult for us artists since we have to backwards engineer whatever the brain does. Kids often draw stuff unwrapped, and always draw stuff in their local color.
    Some artists go back to drawing stuff as the brain wants us to see them, like wierd picasso perspective, or impressionistic dazzling colors and values.

    I heard somewhere that we can only read/see/concentrate on a spot the size of a thumb an arm length away. The rest of the image is blury and perhaps under the command of a more instinctive the part of the brain that just scans for moving stuff or familiar shapes. The brain can also fill in details we assume are there, like near the blind spot or at the edge of the image.
    Last edited by Prometheus|ANJ; December 23rd, 2003 at 10:52 AM.
    Jamen jag tror att han skäms, och har gömt sig. Vårt universum det är en av dom otaliga spermasatser som Herren i sin självhärliga ensamhet har runkat fram för å besudla intet.

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 15 Times in 4 Posts
    i lub you prom

    #k

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    665
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 221 Times in 19 Posts
    A guess that this is the best place to post this.

    Prom, your previous text tutorials are worth a lot to me. After reading those and a few things prior to that I have been much more aware of the world around me.

    I have a feeling that I was following the right path, but then I saw your tutorial and a handful of other things that really opened my eyes to the world of color.

    For instance I knew about radiosity, but never implemented it very well in my artwork because I never really observed it that closely in the real world.

    Nowadays, it is much different for me.
    I look at everthing. I try to see as much as I can at any given point with the hopes of catching something new that I never knew before.

    Strange enough. I do a lot of photography and if you look at my last two years worth of photos you'll notice a dramatic improvement. I now focus a lot more. I try to take what I see through the lens and apply it to my art work.

    Not to get too mushy....

    Just wanted to say thanks and keep up the good work.

    Phil

  15. #13
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    310
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Thank you for this. It is self explanatory and makes me want more pictures and diagrams, no need for text. the captions are enough. You obviously know what it's about and I await the day that I understand as much.

  16. #14
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    this is awsome... I lurk more than I post, but this is EXACTLY what I'm trying to learn more off right now.

    wonderful, thanks again!


    now all I need is to print out your tut's so I can stack em in my "notes" folder.

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    SWE
    Posts
    2,536
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 1,309 Times in 389 Posts
    I'm glad you like them. I learn a lot myself from writing them cuz I'm forced to formulate things consistantly.

    Here's a really wierd example though:

    Light reflection works just like... tennisballs bouncing of ...rocky asteroids... how they bounce away depends on the incoming angle, surface angle and how bumpy the surface is (I'm ignoring subsurface scattering and refraction). If the surface is smooth the 'bounce-away' angles will be very easy to predict. If the surface is very bumpy, the tennisballs will scatter away in all sorts of directions.

    The intensity of the light depends on the number of tennisballs that enter our eye.

    You get a specular on a gloss sphere because the tennisballs can only bounce into your eye if the surface angle is correct, and since a sphere is curved there's only one point where the angle is correct. Even if the surface angle is almost correct you won't see any light from there.

    On a more bumpy sphere, chances are that a few tennisballs hit some bumps a bit away from the specular point and thus manages to get the right angle to enter your eye. A bumpy sphere will have a less pronounced speculars because of the bumps randomizing the bounce of the tennisballs, in return, we'll get too see parts of the object we wouldn't get to see otherwise.

    That's why gloss object often have flat values and a few specular highlights popping out, whilst a dull (bumpy) object doesn't have any speculars, but appears more volumated cuz more light from the more obscure angles manages to find its way to our eyes. But the main shapes of the object is still important cuz the bumps can't change the bounce angle too much. Don't forget that here on earth we have lots of ambient light bouncing around too, cuz we have so many objects here the light can bounce off. The effects of light are probably easiest to observe in a dark room with a single spot lightsource.

    But even something dull like cotton cloth have speculars. I stretched my sleeve out with 2 fingers (marked by dots) and took two pics from different angles.
    Speculars, radiosity, etc.
    Last edited by Prometheus|ANJ; December 25th, 2003 at 02:11 PM.
    Jamen jag tror att han skäms, och har gömt sig. Vårt universum det är en av dom otaliga spermasatser som Herren i sin självhärliga ensamhet har runkat fram för å besudla intet.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Art: scanline no radiosity
    By raytracer in forum 3D Art, Sculpture & Toy Art
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 17th, 2007, 11:22 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Developed Actively by the makers of the Best Amazon Podcast