View Poll Results: Vote for your favourite entry in this round of IDW

Voters
31. You may not vote on this poll
  • devilminer

    4 12.90%
  • Dragonspit

    0 0%
  • hallo

    7 22.58%
  • Majenkus

    10 32.26%
  • Bagg

    3 9.68%
  • Scorge

    7 22.58%
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 17

Thread: IDW #98: Mission to Mars - Orbital Station - Voting

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,689
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 1,130 Times in 479 Posts

    Icon IDW #98: Mission to Mars - Orbital Station - Voting

    IDW #98 Topic: Mission to Mars - Orbital Station

    Deadline: Saturday, April 25

    No voting for your own entries! I repeat, no voting for your own entries

    Give critiques and comments, we're all here to learn from each other!

    Original thread: IDW #98: Mission to Mars - Orbital Station

    Name:  IDW logo poll smaller.JPG
Views: 1419
Size:  7.5 KB
    Last edited by yoitisi; April 18th, 2009 at 09:56 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    134
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 97 Times in 36 Posts

    Space Station - Mission to Mars

    I went ahead and chose one of the two (the other being the cartoony looking one in the non-finals thread). The following description is for this creepy-looking submission:

    The essentials for living include a water treatment and recycling plant, communication cabin, agricultural habitats throughout the eastern-most walls, solar panels, satellite scope utilizers, and a shuttle dock. The station has enough food to hold up to 6 astronauts for a good three months. It is equipped with special units for restrooms, beds, and a living room.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Portland OR-e-gun, USA
    Posts
    337
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts

    Idw#98

    The first Mars Orbital Enviromental System (Moes), went together suprisingly well compared to how poor the aestethics ended up being. The priorities revolved around getting equipment to the station, and using as many components in transit and reusing them within the facility. Power was limited, food was almost all shipped frozen, but ez to keep that way. There was a small gravitational structure to give residents a break from free fall. With a handful of docking areas and continuous work, was a busy place, and it was, a starting point.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 24 Times in 15 Posts
    This was a bit rushed, i first saw the thread two - three days ago, and started on this even later. None the less, im happy with the design. The rest could use some more time, but w/e
    -----------------------------------------------
    During the 2010's, space traveling began focusing on self sufficiency on the stations. At the same time, the people cried out for a human on Mars. The anwser was the space station "Ibis II" which was entered orbit around Mars in 2026. It was supplied by nuclear and solar power, capable of suplying the station for atleast 15 years without refilling. The greenhouses suplied both food, and clean air. Fuel was gathered from mars in the form of natural gasse, and the ice cape provided new water. Regular supplies from Earth was however still needed.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Bremen
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 41 Times in 16 Posts
    bit rushed too, no problem if it's not going to the poll - the topic was just too good, looking forward to the next one!

    This is not for you.


    FBRCCN
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
    "Welcome to Gargantua 11, Mars Orbital Space Station. After the first 10 Gargantuas crashed into Earth, VB Industries was persuaded by the Earth government to build something to 'orbit' Mars."

    Assumptions about Gargantua 11:

    Materials and energy sources are the same as present day, only stronger and more efficient (ie no fusion).

    No artificial gravity and humans need to rotate at ~2rpms or less to avoid discomfort during prolonged periods.

    Single Stage to Orbit reusable craft will become an efficient means of putting things in space.
    Last edited by Majenkus; April 16th, 2009 at 10:35 AM. Reason: wording
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In a box ruled by the evil wacom overlord
    Posts
    299
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked 89 Times in 78 Posts
    Hey All By the way this was a great topic and I hope theres gonna be more like this one.

    The BAGG orbital station has a rather unconventional use, Instead of acting as a home and workplace for scientists and astronauts it is more readily used as a receiving station for personal and equiment from earth, they will then transfer down to Mars itself to live in the planetary base.
    The main problem with an Orbital station so far away from earth is the need for water, food and oxygen.
    The price to constantly fly resources to the space station is extremely costly and so it would be more feasible and efficient to create a self sustaining planetary base and have the orbital staion as a checkpoint.
    The space station contains living quarters for when personel are arriving or leaving. It also stores energy using the huge solar panels and also acts as a satilite for infomation being sent to or from earth.
    Attachment 646989
    SKETCHBOOK

    ----DESKTOPS THREAD----
    : Share your desktops and wallpapers :

    "THE HOLES ARE FOR MY EYES"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Coast
    Posts
    888
    Thanks
    1,046
    Thanked 1,905 Times in 438 Posts
    My first IDW. How exciting it is.

    The year is 2035, and we've established our second international space station orbiting mars. The station is run under nuclear power for the time being, but scientists in the two labs are competing to complete the first cold fusion powered space station. Here we see the station after it's completion in 2033.
    Last edited by scorge; April 16th, 2009 at 12:49 AM. Reason: I had some more time, so i took advantage.
    Check it out
    Blog, we've all got em:http://davesrightmind.blogspot.com/
    Creatures Galore!:www.creaturespot.com
    Full gallery o' stuff:davesrightmind.deviantart.com
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,689
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 1,130 Times in 479 Posts
    As usual, some notes on this round:

    Good to see some people tackling this topic. I wasn't sure if it was a bit too scientific a topic for most, but there's some nice entries this time around I think.

    Again, sorry for putting up the poll this late, I wasn't planning on it but life got in the way this week. Next week will be more punctual, I promise
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    147
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 42 Times in 41 Posts
    Yoitisi, hey, its been a while since I last came around here, since the asteroid miner project, but damn...what happened here?!? I finally got a friend to tackle IDW from now on, so I'll be participating once again with this. But what happened people? Where's the ingenuity and design?

    With that said, I voted for Hallo, straightforward and not too far out in presenting the idea of the future. Great heliocentric design and overall thematic setup.

    I can't wait to get back into this and for the next theme. Just to assure you, yoitisi, there are people that still believe in this thread...keep the topics coming.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to f1guremeout For This Useful Post:


  13. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Portland OR-e-gun, USA
    Posts
    337
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
    My vote went to Majenkis. I liked the idea that it had all the necessary or defined items to make a station, but still kinda....put/thrown together as necessary.

    Devilminer, l liked the design, kinda menacing, but in comparison to the size of the shuttle, tis awful small to do all the things it would need.

    Rabies, kinda looks just thrown together as a sketch, and unfinished as a painting.

    Hallo- the idea is good, but there is no detail to what anything is and its very general in its design.

    Bagg, it was ok, no real detail, presentation kinda bland compared to some of the others.

    Scorg. I would have voted on this next, and like majenkis, I liked the hodge poge of this and thas all over. However, its soooo condensed, I mean if you look at the shuttle, if you wanted to dock another, you couldnt, they are right on top of each other and then again, on top of the solar arrays. all combined, there is no menauvering room around the station. some of this could be the angles drawn and stuff, but its just how it comes across to me.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dragonspit For This Useful Post:


  15. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    100
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by f1guremeout View Post
    but damn...what happened here?!? I finally got a friend to tackle IDW from now on, so I'll be participating once again with this. But what happened people? Where's the ingenuity and design?
    Hey mate, there's a difference between constructive criticism and being discouraging. Not all of us have the benefit of a design background and we're still trying to figure things out and the fact that were trying to do that here means that maybe we believe too. I look forward to seeing some more of your work, your references for IDW99 point to something really unique.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,689
    Thanks
    405
    Thanked 1,130 Times in 479 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Majenkus View Post
    Hey mate, there's a difference between constructive criticism and being discouraging.
    f1guremeout: I have to agree with Majenkus here, I don't mind people speaking their mind as long as they respect each other, but some more constructive comments to go with such a statement would be appreciated.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. CROSSOVER! - EOW # 190 / IDW # 206 - Orbital Refinery - VOTING!
    By Pixie Trick in forum Industrial Design of the Week
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 16th, 2012, 11:08 AM
  2. IDW #98: Mission to Mars - Orbital Station
    By yoitisi in forum Industrial Design of the Week
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: April 18th, 2009, 09:50 AM
  3. VOTING!!! Teen Challenge #38: Siege of Mars
    By Evil_Sloth in forum Teen Challenge
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 8th, 2007, 09:46 AM
  4. DSG 440: Orbital Space Station
    By mtomczek in forum DAILY SKETCH GROUP
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: May 30th, 2004, 02:45 PM

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook