Results 27 to 39 of 441
March 24th, 2009 #27
Seems like the hardest part might be getting teams formed I'd suggest people group up with similiar interests maybe or styles? Or maybe even by disciplines... like someone might be good at line art, someone else coloring, another backgrounds, etc? I dunno, that might be a dumb approach... but might make it a bit more streamlined.
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 24th, 2009 #28
I like the sound of this new CHOW-thingy. I'd love to enter if someone thinks I'll be a good member of the team that is....Pm me if you do think so...Or else, daestwen, well just put me in a team with members that'll fit around my level or lower. That way I could teach and learn something from my team mates in one leap.
Beware....this'll be my first CHOW....
March 24th, 2009 #29
March 24th, 2009 #30
March 24th, 2009 #31
This sounds good. I work best when I have to answer to someone. I have no idea where I fit, so I can either be assigned to a team or someone can PM me if they'd like me.
This could be so much fun.
March 24th, 2009 #32Khaugen
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Sarasota, Florida
- Thanked 47 Times in 17 Posts
I'm in if anyone wants me on their team.
Art blog: http://artofkin.blogspot.com
CA sketchbook: http://www.conceptart.org/forums/sho...d.php?t=127325
March 24th, 2009 #33
Oh, what the hell. I'm in on this if I can find a group.
March 24th, 2009 #34
March 24th, 2009 #35
March 24th, 2009 #36
I think this is a really good idea and could be a lot of fun... provided there is an even playing field. So I'm with Daniela here 100%... and I'm willing to go wherever.
But... I have to be totally honest if I see a groups of Posh, Bumskee, Vorace and JessiBean's forming together (for example)... what will be the point of this challenge? If it is really to be a community building exercise each group should have people of various skill levels and it shouldn't be the usual buddies getting together.
I think mixing it up will have much more interesting, unexpected results and be a challenge for everyone in different ways. I'm sure Posh and Daestwen don't need more to do... but I really think groups should be "approved" based on variation of the people in it.
Just my 2 cents... as usual.
March 24th, 2009 #37
March 24th, 2009 #38
March 24th, 2009 #39
I think shan, above, says it best. I think we would all be best suited to grouping out of the norms. Not only will we be introduced to new people, but we can also learn from each other not only on an individual base, but I think alot of people would like to learn what it would be like to be in a team environment (provided that the team is very well constructed and streamlined). And then there is also the matter of getting different skill levels thrown together. This also seems interesting as everyone might have something to learn.
I dunno, throwing in my 2cents as well 0.o
Almost like mini-studios, competing for opportunity I suppose...
The Following User Says Thank You to Mat Kaminski For This Useful Post: