Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread: Am I cheating scum?
March 19th, 2009 #1
Am I cheating scum?
Okay, so here's my latest. It may look mildly impressive at first until you hear that I used a photo reference. There is NO WAY I could draw a background like this from imagination, as half of the people on these forums could. And thus I feel like I'm a fraudulent, background-stealing fake artist ill deserving of the ubiquitous praise I get over at Deviantart (as one might expect).
Hide this ad by registering as a memberMarch 19th, 2009 #2
most of the time you don't know if someone is using a reference in their work because they don't mention it. If you took the ref and directly copied it then fine, its a study, hopefully you learned something. If you took your ref and embellished it and this the outcome, then nice work. It looks great either way so stop whining and asking for someone to stomp on you.
Go work on your figure drawing and get out of the 80s for gods sake.
The Following User Says Thank You to Matsign For This Useful Post:
March 19th, 2009 #3
March 19th, 2009 #4
March 19th, 2009 #5
lets clarify something here. some ppl think reference seems to mean paintover. the phrase reference means to refer to, i.e. you look at something. using photos to paintover or using filters on them isnt cheating but it looks like what it is and there fore sucks.
The Following User Says Thank You to rattsang For This Useful Post:
March 19th, 2009 #6
...And as for figure work, I even use photo reference (of myself) for that.
Which is okay if I'm drawing myself beating myself up.
March 19th, 2009 #7
its a study. asl ong as you didnt use the eye dropper two much you would learn a hell of allot about colour. and if you didnt trace it you would learn allot about proportions and perspective.
Remember your not trying to impress every time you draw, sometimes you are using it as a tool to aid your understanding of something.
theres some amazing lighting & detail in the image. the image stands on its own and i love it. love to see a background of that quality with some people in it. x
keep it up. x
The Following User Says Thank You to Stephen Mason For This Useful Post:
March 19th, 2009 #8
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
The Following User Says Thank You to Elwell For This Useful Post:
March 19th, 2009 #9
That said, I think you did an awesome job on this. Fantastic rendering.
The Following User Says Thank You to Moai For This Useful Post:
March 20th, 2009 #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
would anyone want to escape from the 80s?
March 20th, 2009 #11
Looks pretty nice to me. Would you mind posting the reference, though, just for comparison's sake?
March 20th, 2009 #12
March 20th, 2009 #13
Notice how your painting of the subway station looks better than the photograph? A painter can control the content of his work better than a photographer, and show you exactly what he wants you to see. Nothing more, nothing less. I think the best art is therefore photorealistic painting, not photography.
Now could I draw something like that from imagination? Sure. If I first practiced for several years and didn't get bored or distracted by anything else. It all comes down to stamina and willpower, I suppose. But I don't even feel I have enough of that stuff to draw something like that from reference. It's not my passion. I'll love it when A.I. gets to the point where we can teach computers to do this kind of thing.
As far as imagination... Have there ever been times in your life when your mind is flooded with images when you lie down and close your eyes at the end of the day? Perhaps images of things from the day, or people you might meet, or drawings you might do in the future? That has happened to me only a couple times in the past several years, and it always involved being in a new environment with lots of social, visual and/or intellectual stimulation. I had to get out of my routine and attend a conference or a wedding in a new place. It's fascinating how the mind works. What's especially useful is when you can learn to flood your mind with images of pictures you might draw in the future. It makes the inspiration part of being an artist a lot easier.
The Following User Says Thank You to Dahami For This Useful Post:
March 20th, 2009 #14Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
wow i really like the first pic. however, i´m wondering how you achieved such gleam effects?!? could you please tell me? thx bye
March 20th, 2009 #15
March 20th, 2009 #16
Heh. My crit has nothing to do with using reference or not. As a graphic designer, the thing that sticks out most glaringly to me is that you used two different fonts for your 3s. A sign-maker would not do this. Every info sign in the metro system would stick to the same font.
March 20th, 2009 #17
Nice piece! I don't think using photo reference is a bad thing if your using it for its informational value. The only real crit I have is that the large sign and its reflection depict two different things! Keep up the good work!
March 21st, 2009 #18
I also think it comes down to what the artist is trying to accomplish by using the photo reference. This piece strikes me more as a learning challenge because you really didn't add or evolve anything about the pic. It's not used to advance some narrative or make a statement as far as I can see. You did a great job at capturing the details but ultimately if you walk away from this piece without learning anything was it really worth it?
March 21st, 2009 #19
March 21st, 2009 #20Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Manchester, England
- Thanked 668 Times in 592 Posts