Results 1 to 15 of 15
Thread: More portfolio work.
September 5th, 2008 #1
More portfolio work.
Hi folks, now I've posted a few times I got some courage to do more. These are works from earlier this year, I'd love to hear your crits on them. The dragon was featured in Expose 6. All in Photoshop, as usual.
Last edited by Jason Juta; September 5th, 2008 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Added medium used (Photoshop).Jason Juta
Hide this ad by registering as a memberSeptember 5th, 2008 #2
September 5th, 2008 #3
Wow, the detail on that tree is great.
September 5th, 2008 #4
September 5th, 2008 #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Winnipeg, MB Canada
- Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
I really like the first one! I like the foreground of the second one. The background seems a little confusing.
September 6th, 2008 #6Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
The dragon looks just amazing... I love the spell/charm as well
September 6th, 2008 #7
Like them both. The tree one has some really nice coloring, but the hand seems soft, like it needs more structure or dynamic pose, cant quite put my finger on it. Good stuff all around.
September 6th, 2008 #8
Fantastic... Both pieces.
One thing I've never really understood, however, is why fantasy characters are often rendered without pupils. This is particularly noticeable in some of Todd Lockwood's drow paintings. There is nothing in the D&D literature, as far as I'm aware, to suggest a drow's pupils wouldn't be visible. I suppose it's supposed to suggest a certain mystical intensity or some such, but at the expense of an element of realism.
The color palette of the druid/mage/shaman guy painting reminds me of the controversial color palette in the new Diablo 3 game coming from Blizzard.
September 6th, 2008 #9Likes to look at things
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
I hope you get the courage to post more often man.
As for the no pupils thing, I think in this case he looks more like he is blind to me... maybe that staff also counts as a walking stick, and the bird helps him out too.
September 6th, 2008 #10
September 6th, 2008 #11
on the second pic, if you flipped the crescent on top of the magician's staff it would work better with the composition.
September 6th, 2008 #12
The Dragon is really great. There's a lot of good stuff in the second piece, too, but it's not up to the same level. I don't agree with flopping the crescent, but I do thing the interaction of the top of the staff and the branch behind it is kind of awkward. I wish the figure overall were drawn better as well, others have noted the anatomy problems. And the combination of his cloak overlapping his upper arm and the way his forearm is painted makes him look like he has Popeye arms.
**Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial
Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!
"Work is more fun than fun."
"Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
September 7th, 2008 #13
I think the second piece is much more interesting than the first. It is more intense and surprising. Of course there are technical issues and it is not quite 'there' if you know what I mean, but give me some imagination and some courageous chances taken over safe predictability any day of the week. That second picture kinda sticks in the mind for that very reason - you have had the balls to follow your imagination rather than compromise with the usual fantasy template - I like it and well done.
From Gegarin's point of view
September 7th, 2008 #14
Thanks for the positive comments and useful crits, I definitely would make some changes if I were to do this one again - always a learning experience. About the eyes, he is meant to be blind, and his bird-familiar sees for him. I think I should have put in pale irises with no pupils which would have put that across better.
September 8th, 2008 #15
Nice lighting on the tree.