Anatomy Process: "Figure Drawing" Includes Downloadable PDF

Join 500,000+ Artists

Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Anatomy Process: "Figure Drawing" Includes Downloadable PDF

    Last edited by Sepulverture; November 24th, 2009 at 09:11 AM.
     


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. The Following 39 Users Say Thank You to E.M.GIST For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  4. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,287
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I have a question regarding your technique...
    I know of other techniques that I have been studying that claim to begin with the ribcage mass, or others who claim to start with the pelvic mass.

    The reasons given were that the head is one of the least structurally important parts of the figure (as Hogarth illustrates) and that the model's head very often moves from the beginning of the pose.

    Do you have a particular reason for beginning with the head?

    Hope this comes off sounding the way I mean it, genuinely curious and wanting to learn.

     

  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    glikster-No, there is no reason for starting with the head other than it is fairly consistent, as it is not affected by a persons build(if you workout your head doesn't get bigger, physically). I personally don't like starting with any of the masses. I look for the relationship between those masses (the gesture). My starting point however is marking the top, bottom and middle of my pose. Then I find what sits on the middle point, the crotch for instance. The main focus for me in the first sitting of a pose is getting the gesture and rough placement of landmarks (pit of the neck, tips of shoulders, crotch, etc.) once this is solid then I start to develope my masses based on this gesture. The reason for this is, proportional masses are easy to adjust just trim a little here add alittle there, but if the gesture is not correct

    Last edited by Elwell; September 3rd, 2008 at 04:07 PM.
     

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    919
    Thanks
    99
    Thanked 378 Times in 63 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    very nice of you to share these, thank you so much!

    I just noticed that I'm reading this very differently now that I started art school and actually am drawing from the model every day. our approach at angel is similar, I'll quickly point out the differences for you erik and those interested:

    -we also start with marking top-bottom-middle
    -we draw a plumbline with these marks (top-bottom-middle) and choose a reasonable position of the plumbline on the model, actually using a plumb weight on a string (as opposed to using the pencil, both methods work well I guess. it seems we can decide pretty well if something is horizontal or vertical)
    -once the plumbline is set, we then draw a little thumbnail sketch of our idea of the gesture to decide about questions like "am I going to use a c-curve on the leg, or will a s-curve be more powerful/accurate?" about 5 cm in height, not worrying about proportion too much but doing it as accurate as possible in a reasonable amount of time (5-10 minutes)
    -the thumbnail sketch done, we start on the actual drawing. not with the head as you do, but with establishing the height of shoulders and hips.
    -next is finding the width of shoulders, hips and head, and blocking in the feet
    -then we proceed as you do, using as few and as long lines as possible, to keep it as simple and as powerful as possible while still being accurate

    the next step would be "articulation" instead of "structure", which means defining the shapes a bit more, but still staying more "2D". there is no stage where we consciously switch to "3D-Thinking" as far as I know. We just learn to copy what we see, the shapes, the tones. But I will definitely try to draw contour lines once we pass the gestures-only stage!

    hope that's of interest to anybody..!

    btw. we also never draw from imagination, just pure copying. I'm doing it on my own as much as possible, though.


    a question: I'm having trouble with getting small sizes right. like the height and width of the head.. I couldn't possibly start with the head, it would be too wrong. we measure stuff with a knitting needle, but I find it rather inacurate. half a centimeter difference makes a head look a LOT bigger/smaller.
    do you have any tips on getting stuff like this right?
    practise eyeballing?


    thanks again for putting together the tut!

     

  7. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 331 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Good point about the mentolabial sulcus, EM. But what is analyzation? It sounds like it could be painful.

    I thought dorian made a very thought-provoking contribution on the difference between the purely visual approach to drawing of the Angel school (and its numerous clones) and the classical, constructional approach that you are summarizing here. The debate goes back at least to Caravaggio vs. the Carracci, and has already come up a few times in my short time here. The visual approach prepares the student specifically for tonal painting from real subjects that are immobile and indefinitely available, and can be extended to more ephemeral or mobile subjects only by the use of photographs. To draw or paint the latter subjects from life, to draw with any sort of gestural directness, and of course to get down anything that exists only in the memory or imagination - for these things we need the classical kind of training, of which you are obviously an enthusiastic and thoughtful exponent.

     

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    2,925
    Thanks
    410
    Thanked 273 Times in 205 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    hehe actually, "analyzation" is a word.

     

  9. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 331 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Meaning getting too anal about one's drawings?

     

  10. #8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hudson River valley, NY
    Posts
    16,212
    Thanks
    4,879
    Thanked 16,671 Times in 5,020 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by briggsy@ashtons
    The visual approach prepares the student specifically for tonal painting from real subjects that are immobile and indefinitely available, and can be extended to more ephemeral or mobile subjects only by the use of photographs.
    Ironically, the people who are the most dogmatic about this approach also tend to be equally dogmatic about not using photos.


    Tristan Elwell
    **Finished Work Thread **Process Thread **Edges Tutorial

    Crash Course for Artists, Illustrators, and Cartoonists, NYC, the 2013 Edition!

    "Work is more fun than fun."
    -John Cale

    "Art is supposed to punch you in the brain, and it's supposed to stay punched."
    -Marc Maron
     

  11. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 331 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Probably just as well, since (I would argue) you need the depth of understanding of the classical approach in order to be able to work from photos convincingly. I'm quite certain that Loomis, for example, worked from photos to a huge extent, but he was able to do so because he knew how to draw.

     

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I updated with the definitive version, with the final drawing. You may have to hit refresh.
    and drumroll please...

    "Analyzation: the act of analyzing, or separating into constituent parts"
    or atleast thats what the dictionary says.

     

  13. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 331 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Very good, patdzon and E.M. A "rare and probably seldom-needed synonym of analysis" has found a use in life.

    Now, mental ...labia ...sulkas ...

     

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Sorry, that should have been mental labial sulcus. Its fixed now.

     

  15. #13
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    830
    Thanks
    188
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 331 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Can happen to anyone EM. I was trying to draw your attention to that one more discreetly in my first post. Hope I haven't come across as a carping critic.

     

  16. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I have seen it spelled three ways "mental labial sulcus" "mentolabial sulcus" and "labio-mental sulcus" does it matter which is used or does anyone no the "most" correct.

     

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Qc, Canada
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Thanks for posting this tutorial, E.M.Gist. Is the book out already?

    - Josef
     

  18. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Carlsbad
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 285 Times in 43 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Thanks for the renewed interest in this thread. As far as the book goes it will probably be a while, it is something Jeff Watts and I are working on in our spare time, which is not ample. We want to do it right so it will probably be a couple years. You all will be the first to know when it is nearing completion

     

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to E.M.GIST For This Useful Post:


Members who have read this thread: 19

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook