Art: Landscape

View testimonialsView Artwork
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Landscape

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Landscape

    I don't do many landscapes so I thought I'd try one using the oil pastels in Painter. Should the reflection be a little darker towards the bottom or less saturated overall? Can't decide.

    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    171
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I think what would benefit the image most is some more contrast. Try to flip the image to gray scale and check it out. I think if you got some more depth through higher contrast you'd give it some more pop.



    D

    My sketchbooks. Don't be nice. Be honest.

    My main Sketchbook!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,880
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 271 Times in 267 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I actually like the thumbnail version better, because in the full image you can see there is not much actual detail.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,188
    Thanks
    785
    Thanked 666 Times in 165 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    yes, the reflections should be slightly darker (which includes the sky reflection..),and reveal the color of the water (either refraction of the river bottom, if the water is clear, or the color of the particles floating in the water, if the water is muddy) in the dark areas of the reflections, instead of being the exact same colors.
    I like the palette.
    I like the simplicity of the piece but I think the boring brushstrokes and the lack of attention in the drawing of your shapes (like the tree trunk/branches) kinda kills it.
    I don't mean there should be more detail, just more control and accuracy in the level of detail you're shooting for.

    Another thing, it seems like you just flipped the top part to do the reflection (well actually the brushstrokes seem different in some places, but the distances look the same), and that isn't realistic unless your eye is exactly on the surface of the water. The objects should be mirrored from the virtual point where they would cross the water if the water plane was infinite, and not from the edge of the water.
    Hope it makes sense

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  6. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    56
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Solid start to the piece definately but the killer here is the lack of contrast which has been stated. Also I would focus on adding some more overall visual interest and refined details to really give the eye a place to flow.

    Horny Lion
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    141
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Thanks for the crits. I'll bump up the contrast and deal with the reflection. It may look like I just flipped the image, but I did actually repaint it all. And M@ - that does make sense, thanks.

    The image is for an feature story so I have to keep in mind to leave room for text. I also have to add some people doing various things, but I wanted to post this version here - in case I muck it up.

    Cheers.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,232
    Thanks
    679
    Thanked 861 Times in 364 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by m@. View Post
    yes, the reflections should be slightly darker (which includes the sky reflection..),and reveal the color of the water (either refraction of the river bottom, if the water is clear, or the color of the particles floating in the water, if the water is muddy) in the dark areas of the reflections, instead of being the exact same colors.
    I like the palette.
    I like the simplicity of the piece but I think the boring brushstrokes and the lack of attention in the drawing of your shapes (like the tree trunk/branches) kinda kills it.
    I don't mean there should be more detail, just more control and accuracy in the level of detail you're shooting for.

    Another thing, it seems like you just flipped the top part to do the reflection (well actually the brushstrokes seem different in some places, but the distances look the same), and that isn't realistic unless your eye is exactly on the surface of the water. The objects should be mirrored from the virtual point where they would cross the water if the water plane was infinite, and not from the edge of the water. Hope it makes sense
    Actually i see somethin's rong and i think i know what u mean but i'd be thankful if u could develop the "theory part" on water reflection a little more. I'm not sure i know this "law".

    Btw nice pic stevethomas.

    Last edited by SM; May 2nd, 2008 at 08:22 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • 424,149 Artists
  • 3,599,276 Artist Posts
  • 32,941 Sketchbooks
  • 54 New Art Jobs
Art Workshop Discount Inside
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook