Favorite Period in Art History?

Join 500,000+ Artists

Its' free and it takes less than 10 seconds!

Join the #1 Art Workshop - LevelUpJoin Premium Art Workshop

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ogden Utah
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0

    Favorite Period in Art History?

    oook, so after doing several hours of image cards for my art history class i decided to start this thread. I want to know what everyone's favorite period in art history is. Is it Ancient Greek? Romanesque? Medievil? Or do you simply not give a darn about the history of art?

    My personal favorite is Greek. I feel that the beauty of the human figure hasn't quite been captured like the masters that sculpted famous works such as the Venus Di Milo, The Scraper, or the Warship Nike did. Plus the Ancient Greeks had a profound influence on almost all western architecture produced sense their time.

    I thought this might be an interesting topic seeing as we're all "artists" here, and to see how many of us appreciate art's history. Sorry if there has already been a thread on this.

    Last edited by Toxdel; February 24th, 2008 at 04:05 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  


  2. Hide this ad by registering as a member
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    3,763
    Thanks
    2,126
    Thanked 1,004 Times in 654 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Probably Renaissance.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,888
    Thanks
    752
    Thanked 3,153 Times in 1,067 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Toxdel View Post
    oook, so after doing several hours of image cards for my art history class i decided to start this thread. I want to know what everyone's favorite period in art history is. Is it Ancient Greek? Romanesque? Medievil? Or do you simply not give a darn about the history of art?

    My personal favorite is Greek. I feel that the beauty of the human figure hasn't quite been captured sense the masters that sculpted famous works such as the Venus Di Milo, The Scraper, or the Warship Nike. Plus the Ancient Greeks had a profound influence on almost all western architecture produced sense their time.

    I thought this might be an interesting topic seeing as we're all "artists" here, and how many of us appreciate art's history. Sorry if there has already been a thread on this.
    You mean Hellenistic, and the scraper is a roman copy of a greek statue, like many of the things we associate with the greeks.

    "Astronomy offers an aesthetic indulgence not duplicated in any other field. This is not an academic or hypothetical attraction and should require no apologies, for the beauty to be found in the skies has been universally appreciated for unrecorded centuries."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    855
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like the present, we've got the most stuff.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ogden Utah
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    @BuckWeisel- actually the scrapper is considered late classical ancient Greek but your right about the Roman copy thing, its a shame that most of the original works were lost because they were supposedly even better then the copies made by the romans. Hellenistic is a sub-category of Ancient Greek, but probably the strongest of the ancient Greek categories. I'm a fan of Ancient Greek as a whole though

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    2,522
    Thanks
    438
    Thanked 437 Times in 209 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Right now!

    Brendan Noeth

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    2,988
    Thanks
    295
    Thanked 289 Times in 172 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I'm torn between now and the renaissance. The Renaissance because the art was new, pure, amazing. But now because your art doesn't need to be part of some form of religion like it did back then.

    Overall I think our time period sucks, but we are exposed to so much, each of us can go any way possible with our style. There is almost no limit.

    My work: [link]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  9. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    435
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Im strongly drawn to the fluidity of Art Nouveau, and the structural linearity of Art Deco.

    I like those periods a lot. I also pretty fascinated with the intricacy of baroque art work but am more drawn to the architecture than the paintings.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ogden Utah
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Right now is a pretty good time in art. With the invention of the internet, and the ease at which people can access information, trends, and techniques can be transfered fast. We are also seeing less location specific styles of art for the same reason. Its becoming more of a simple question of time rather then location. Sad thing is that most of the famous art right now is abstract stuff and there is a good chance that when art historians of later years look at this period the thing they will probably focus most on is the trends in abstract art; probably over looking most of the effort that got put into entertainment art such as concept design.

    -ya never know though, maybe mediums will expand and a large mention of digital work will develop in art historians essays.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    786
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 307 Times in 132 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    now. there's a whole lot of cool stuff happening now where everything goes, but nothing's taken for granted cuz the shackles of modern/postmodern idealogy are gone. a good time to be an artist!

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  12. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    435
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Yeah but in 20-30 years well look back on this time and recognize it as the age of digital fantasy.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    126
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Toxdel View Post
    @BuckWeisel- actually the scrapper is considered late classical ancient Greek but your right about the Roman copy thing, its a shame that most of the original works were lost because they were supposedly even better then the copies made by the romans. Hellenistic is a sub-category of Ancient Greek, but probably the strongest of the ancient Greek categories. I'm a fan of Ancient Greek as a whole though

    Helenistic is not a sub catagory of ancient Greek. It is an entirely different and distinct period of history. The ruling people though they would have called themselves Greek (much like the Bizantine empire still called itself Rome) where not Greek. And the ruling system was completely different we saw imperialism instead of seperate city states and democracy.


    And the Venus di Milo is helenistic. It was sculpted my Alexandros of antioch on the meander.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    585
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I liked the 40's - 50's era.

    FUCK YOU YA PRETENTIOUS DICKS!! BAN ME!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  15. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ogden Utah
    Posts
    324
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    @Ashkitty - My textbook considers Hellenistic art to be a period within the Ancient Greek period, right after Late classical. It could I guess be considered an entirely different entity due to the dramatic changes in sculptural motifs presented in the era. And yes, the Venus Di Milo is indeed Hellenistic but I don't recall saying it was anything else.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  16. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    961
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    I like right now too, although the old masters of the Renaissance and the Dutch Golden Age of painting (Rembrandt, Vermeer) are my favorites.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  17. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    101
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    The Hudson River School. Not sure that qualifies as a period per se.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  18. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southwestern Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,134
    Thanks
    8,227
    Thanked 5,581 Times in 1,786 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Weimar, and the period right before...

    No position or belief, whether religious, political or social, is valid if one has to lie to support it.--Alj Mary

    Ironically, the concept of SIMPLICITY is most often misunderstood by simple-minded people. --Alj Mary
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

  19. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston area
    Posts
    438
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 121 Times in 56 Posts
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    If you're talking about gallery art, I like the 19th century. Impressionism is nice, and I think romanticism is pretty interesting. I like looking at academic renaissance art. It's mysterious, it looks like some way of thinking that is probably lost now. They had a vision of ideal forms which doesn't seem to exist any more, or if they do exist they're not the same. Same thing with the ancient Greeks and Romans.

    But if you consider things like film art, modern times are pretty good. I don't think I can pick a decade I like best, they all have strengths, except maybe the 80's.

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Register

Developed Actively by vBSocial.com
The Art Department
SpringOfSea's Sketchbook